Advertisement

Material Flow Analysis — unveiling the physical basis of economies

  • Stefan Bringezu

Keywords

Material Flow European Environment Agency Material Flow Analysis Material Flow Accounting Direct Material Input 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adriaanse, A. et al. (1997). Resource Flows — The Material Basis of Industrial Economies. Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  2. Ayres, R.U. (1989). Industrial metabolism, in: J. Ausubel and H. Sladovich (eds). Technology and Environment. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ayres, R.U. and A.V. Kneese (1969). Production, consumption and externalities. American Economic Review 59, 282–296.Google Scholar
  4. Ayres, R.U. and U.E. Simonis (eds) (1994). Industrial Metabolism: Restructuring for Sustainable Development. Tokyo: UNU Press.Google Scholar
  5. Baccini, P. and P.H. Brunner (1991). Metabolism of the Anthroposphere. Berlin, New York and Tokyo: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Barbier, E.B. (1989). Economics, Natural Resource Scarcity and Development. Conventional and Alternative Views. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  7. Bartelmus, P. (1994). Towards a framework for indicators of sustainable development. DESIPA Working Paper Series No. 7. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  8. Berkhout, F. (1999). The concept of industrial metabolism and its implications for statistics. Eurostat Working Papers 2/1999/B/2. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  9. Bringezu, S. (in prep.). Indicators for sustainable resource management (to be issued in the proceedings of the workshop: Nachhaltiges Management metallischer Stoffströme (Congress-Centrum Rolduc, 27–28 June 2001).Google Scholar
  10. Bringezu, S. (2000). Material flow analysis — an overview. Paper presented at the SCOPE Workshop on “Material Flow Analysis for Sustainable Resource Management (MFAStoRM)” (23–24 Nov. 2000). Wuppertal: Wuppertal Institute.Google Scholar
  11. Bringezu, S. (1997). Accounting for the physical basis of national economies: material flow indicators, in: B. Moldan, S. Billharz and R. Matravers (eds), Sustainability Indicators: A Report on the Project on Indicators of Sustainable Development. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Bringezu, S. (1993). Towards increasing resource productivity: How to measure the total material consumption of regional or national economies? Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 2, 437–442.Google Scholar
  13. Bringezu, S. and Y. Moriguchi (2001). Material Flow Analysis, in: R.U. Ayres and L. Ayres. Hand-book of Industrial Ecology (in press).Google Scholar
  14. Bringezu, S. and H. Schütz (2001a). Material use indicators for the European Union, 1980–1997: Economy-wide material flow accounts and balances and derived indicators of resource use. Eurostat Working Papers 2/2001/B/2. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  15. Bringezu, S. and H. Schütz (2001b). Total Material Resource Flows of the United Kingdom. A study of the Wuppertal Institute for the Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions, final report 6/01.Google Scholar
  16. Bringezu, S., H. Stiller and F. Schmidt-Bleek (1996). Material intensity analysis — a screening step for LCA. Concept, method and applications, in: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on EcoBalance (Tsukuba, Japan, 18–20 November).Google Scholar
  17. Chen, X. and L. Qiao (2000). Material flow analysis of Chinese economic-environmental system. Journal of natural resources 15(1), 17–23.Google Scholar
  18. Daly, H. E. (1990). Towards some operational principles of sustainable development. Ecological Economics 2, 1–6.Google Scholar
  19. Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) (1999). Quality of Life Counts — Indicators for a Strategy for Sustainable Development for the UK: A Baseline Assessment. London: Government Statistical Service.Google Scholar
  20. European Environment Agency (EEA) (2000). Environmental Signals 2000: European Environment Agency Regular Indicator Report. Copenhagen: EEA.Google Scholar
  21. European Environment Agency (EEA) (1999a). Environment in the European Union at the Turn of the Century. Copenhagen: EEA.Google Scholar
  22. European Environment Agency (EEA) (1999b). Environmental Indicators: Typology and Overview. Technical Report No 25. Copenhagen: EEA.Google Scholar
  23. Eurostat (2001). Economy-wide Material Flow Accounts and Derived Indicators — A Methodological Guide. Luxembourg: Eurostat.Google Scholar
  24. Fischer-Kowalski, M. (1998). Society’s metabolism: The intellectual history of material flow analysis, Part I, 1860–1970. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2(1), 61–78.Google Scholar
  25. Fischer-Kowalski, M. and W. Hüttler (1999). Society’s metabolism: The intellectual history of materials flow analysis, Part II, 1970–1998. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2(4), 107–136.Google Scholar
  26. Hoffrén, J. (1999). Measuring the Eco-efficiency of the Finnish Economy. Research reports 229. Helsinki: Statistics Finland.Google Scholar
  27. Japanese Environmental Agency (1992). Quality of the Environment in Japan 1992. Tokyo: Environment Agency.Google Scholar
  28. Jiménez-Beltrán, D. (1998). A Possible Role of Material Flow Analysis within a European Environmental Reporting System — Changing Course in Environmental Information, in: S. Bringezu, M. Fischer-Kowalski, R. Kleijn and V. Palm (eds), Proceedings of the ConAccount Conference (11–12 September 1997), Wuppertal Special 6. Wuppertal: Wuppertal Institute.Google Scholar
  29. Matthews, E. et al. (2000). The Weight of Nations: Material Outflows from Industrial Economies. Washington D. C.: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  30. Mäenpää, I. and A. Juutinen (1999). Time series for the Total Material Requirement of Finnish Economy, Summary, >http://thule.oulu.fi/ecoef/#publications<.
  31. Ministry of the Environment (1999). Material Flow Accounting as a Measure of the Total Consumption of Natural Resources. The Finnish Environment. Helsinki: Ministry of the Environment.Google Scholar
  32. Moldan, B., S. Billharz and R. Matravers (eds) (1997). Sustainability Indicators: A Report on the Project on Indicators of Sustainable Development. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. Mündl, A., H. Schütz, W. Stodulski, J. Sleszynski and M.J. Welfens (1999). Sustainable Development by Dematerialisation in Production and Consumption: Strategy for the New Environmental Policy in Poland, Report 3, 1999. Warsaw: Institute for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
  34. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (1998a). Eco-Efficiency. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  35. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (1998b). Towards Sustainable Development: Environmental Indicators. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  36. Schmidt-Bleek, F. (1994). Wieviel Umwelt braucht der Mensch? MIPS — Das Maß für ökologisches Wirtschaften. Berlin, Basel and Boston: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
  37. Schmidt-Bleek, F., S. Bringezu, F. Hinterberger, C. Liedtke, J. Spangenberg, H. Stiller and M.J. Welfens (1998). MAIA — Einführung in die Material-Intensitäts-Analyse nach dem MIPS-Konzept. Berlin, Basel and Boston: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
  38. Schütz, H. and S. Bringezu (1993). Major material flows in Germany. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 2, 443–448.Google Scholar
  39. Steurer, A. (1992). Stoffstrombilanz Österreich 1988. Schriftenreihe Soziale Ökologie, Vol. 26. Wien: Institut für Interdisziplinäre Forschung und Fortbildung der Universitäten Innsbruck, Klagenfurt und Wien.Google Scholar
  40. United Nations (2000). Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting — An Operational Manual. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  41. United Nations (1993). Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  42. United Nations (1984). A Framework for the Development of Environment Statistics. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  43. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) (ed.) (2000). Measuring Ecoefficiency — A Guide to Reporting Company Performance. Conches-Geneva: WBCSD.Google Scholar
  44. Weizsäcker, Ernst. U. von, A.B. Lovins and L.H. Lovins (1995). Factor Four. Doubling Wealth Halving Resource Use. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Bringezu

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations