Advertisement

Students’ Perceptions about New Modes of Assessment in Higher Education: A Review

  • Katrien Struyven
  • Filip Dochy
  • Steven Janssens
Part of the Innovation and Change in Professional Education book series (ICPE, volume 1)

Keywords

Student Learning Student Teacher Test Anxiety Assessment Practice Deep Approach 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashworth, P., & Bannister, P. (1997). Guilty in whose eyes?. University students’ perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 22(2), 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Birenbaum, M. (1997). Assessment preferences and their relationship to learning strategies and orientations. Higher Education, 33, 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Birenbaum, M., & Feldman, R. A. (1998). Relationships between learning patterns and attitudes towards two assessment formats. Educational Research, 40(1), 90–97.Google Scholar
  4. Birenbaum, M., Tatsuoka, K. K., & Gutvirtz, Y. (1992). Effects of response format on diagnostic assessment of scholastic achievement. Applied psychological measurement, 16(4), 353–363.Google Scholar
  5. Boes, W., & Wante, D. (2001). Portfolio: the story of a student teacher in development./Portfolio: het verhaal van de student in ontwikkeling [Unpublished dissertation/Ongepubliceerde licentiaatverhandeling]. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of Educational Sciences.Google Scholar
  6. Challis, M. (2001). Portfolios and assessment: meeting the challenge. Medical Teacher, 23(5), 437–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chambers, E. (1992). Work-load and the quality of student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 17(2), 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dochy, F., Segers, M., Gijbels, D., & Van den Bossche, P. (2002). Studentgericht onderwijs en probleemgestuurd onderwijs. Betekenis, achtergronden en effecten. Utrecht: Uitgeverij LEMMA.Google Scholar
  9. Drew, S. (2001). Perceptions of what helps learn and develop in education. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(3), 309–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Edelstein, R. A., Reid, H. M., Usatine, R., & Wilkes, M. S. (2000). A comparative study of measures to evaluate medical students’ performances. Academic Medicine, 75(8), 825–833.Google Scholar
  11. Entwistle, N., & Entwistle, A. (1997). Revision and experience of understanding. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), [second edition] (pp. 146–158). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Entwistle, N. J. (1991). Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment. Introduction to the special issue. Higher Education, 22, 201–204.Google Scholar
  13. Entwistle, N. J., & Entwistle, A. (1991). Contrasting forms of understanding for degree examinations: the student experience and its implications. Higher Education, 22, 205–227.Google Scholar
  14. Entwistle, N. J., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  15. Entwistle, N., McCune, V., & Walker, P. (2001). Conceptions, styles, and approaches within higher education: analytical abstractions and everyday experience. In Sternberg & Zhang, Perspectives on cognitive, learning and thinking styles (pp. 103–136). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  16. Entwistle, N., & Tait, H. (1995). Approaches to studying and perceptions of the learning environment across disciplines. New directions for teaching and learning, 64, 93–103.Google Scholar
  17. Flint, N. (2000). Culture club. An investigation of organisational culture. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Sydney.Google Scholar
  18. Franklyn-Stokes, A., & Newstead, S. E. (1995). Undergraduate cheating: who does what and why? Studies in Higher Education, 20(2), 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Friedman Ben-David, M., Davis, M.H., Harden, R.M., Howie, P. W., Ker, J., & Pippard, M. J. (2001). AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 24: Portfolios as a method of student assessment. Medical Teacher, 23(6), 535–551.Google Scholar
  20. Hounsell, D. (1997a). Contrasting conceptions of essay-writing. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning. Implications for teaching and studying in higher education [second edition] (pp. 106–126). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hounsell, D. (1997b). Understanding teaching and teaching for understanding. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning. Implications for teaching and studying in higher education [second edition] (pp. 238–258). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kniveton, B. H. (1996). Student perceptions of assessment methods. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(3), 229–238.Google Scholar
  23. Lomax, R. G. (1996). On becoming assessment literate: an initial look at preservice teachers’ beliefs and practices. Teacher educator, 31(4), 292–303.Google Scholar
  24. Marlin, J. W. Jr. (1987). Student perception of End-of-Course-Evaluations. Journal of Higher Education, 58(6), 704–716.Google Scholar
  25. Marton, F. (1976). On non-verbatim learning. II. The erosion of a task induced learning algorithm. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 17, 41–48.Google Scholar
  26. Marton, F. (1981). Phenomcnography-describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1997). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwislle (Eds.), The experience of learning. Implications for teaching and studying in higher education [second edition] (pp. 39–59). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
  28. Meyer, D. K., & Tusin, L. F. (1999). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of portfolios: process versus product. Journal of Teacher Education, 50(2), 131–139.Google Scholar
  29. Mires, G. J., Friedman Ben-David, M., Preece, P. E., & Smith, B. (2001). Educational benefits of student self-marking of short-answer questions. Medical Teacher, 23(5), 462–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Orsmond, P., Merry, S., et al. (1997). A study in self-assessment: tutor and students’ perceptions of performance criteria. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(4), 357–369.Google Scholar
  31. Ramsden, P. (1981). A study of the relationship between student learning and its academic context [Unpublished Ph.D. thesis]. University of Lancaster.Google Scholar
  32. Ramsden, P. (1997). The context of learning in academic departments. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning. Implications for teaching and studying in higher education [second edition] (pp. 198–217). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
  33. Richardson, J. T. E. (1995). Mature students in higher education: II. An investigation of approaches to studying and academic performance. Studies in Higher Education, 20(1), 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rickinson, B. (1998). The relationship between undergraduate student counseling and successful degree completion. Studies in Higher Education, 23(1), 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Säljä, R. (1975). Qualitative differences in learning as afunction of the learner’s conception of a task. Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
  36. Sambell, K., & McDowell, L. (1998). The construction of the hidden curriculum: messages and meanings in the assessment of student learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(4), 391–402.Google Scholar
  37. Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Brown, S. (1997). ‘But is it fair?’: an exploratory study of student perceptions of the consequential validity of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23(4), 349–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sarason, I. G. (1984). Stress, anxiety and cognitive interference: reactions to tests. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(4), 929–938.Google Scholar
  39. Segers, M., & Dochy, F. (2001). New assessment forms in Problem-based Learning: the value-added of the students’ perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 26(3), 327–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Slater, T. F. (1996). Portfolio assessment strategies for grading first-year university physics students in the USA. Physics Education, 31(5), 329–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). STAI manual for a state-trait anxiety inventory. California: Consulting Psychologist Press.Google Scholar
  42. Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249–276.Google Scholar
  43. Treadwell, I., & Grobler, S. (2001). Students’ perceptions on skills training in simulation. Medical Teacher, 23(5), 476–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1991). Improving the quality of student learning: the influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education, 22, 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Traub, R. E., & MacRury, K. (1990). Multiple choice vs. free response in the testing of scholastic achievement. In K. Ingenkamp & R. S. Jager (Eds.), test und tends 8: jahrbuch derpädagogischen diagnostik (pp. 128–159). Weinheim und Base: Beltz Verlag.Google Scholar
  46. Van IJsendoorn, M. H. (1997). Meta-analysis in early childhood education: progress and problems. In B. Spodek, A. D. Pellegrini, & N. O. Saracho (Eds.), Issues in early childhood education. Yearbook in early childhood education [Volume 7]. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  47. Van Rossum, E. J., & Schenk, S. M. (1984). The relationship between learning conception, study strategy and learning outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54(1), 73–83.Google Scholar
  48. Zeidner, M. (1987). Essay versus multiple-choice type classroom exams: the student’s perspective. Journal of Educational Research, 80(6), 352–358.Google Scholar
  49. Zoller, U., & Ben-Chaim, D. (1988). Interaction between examination-type anxiety state and academic achievement in college science: an action-oriented research, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(1), 65–77.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katrien Struyven
    • 1
  • Filip Dochy
    • 1
  • Steven Janssens
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Instructional Science, Centre for Research on Teacher and Higher EducationUniversity of LeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations