Advertisement

Quaternions, Torsion and the Physical Vacuum: Theories of M. Sachs and G. Shipov Compared

  • David Cyganski
  • Page William S. 
Conference paper
Part of the Fundamental Theories of Physics book series (FTPH, volume 126)

Abstract

Of several developments of unified field theories in the spirit of Einstein’s original objective of a fully geometric description of all classical fields as well as quantum mechanics, two are particularly noteworthy. The works of Mendel Sachs and Gennady Shipov stand apart as major life works comprising tens of papers, several monographs and decades of effort. Direct comparison of these theories is hampered however by differences in notation and conceptual view-point. Despite these differences, there are many parallels between the fundamental mathematical structures appearing in each. In this paper we discuss the main tenets of the two approaches and demonstrate that they both give rise to a factorization of the invariant interval of general relativity.

Keywords

Covariant Derivative Quaternion Algebra Affine Connection Physical Vacuum Tetrad Field 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    General Relativity and Matter; A Spinor Field Theory from Fermis to Light-Years, Mendel Sachs, D. Reidel Publishing Co., 1982.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Quantum Mechanics from General Relativity; An Approximation for a Theory of Inertia, Mendel Saclis, Reidel Publishing Co., 1986.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    A Theory of Physical Vacuum, G. I. Shipov, English edition, Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, 1998.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Mathematical Papers, by William Clifford, London, 1882. Lectures and Essays, Vol.1, London, 1879.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    E. Cartan, Bull. Soc. France Math. 41, 53, 1913.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    I. Infield, B.L. Van Der Waerden, Sitzber. preuss. Akad. Wiss., Physik-math. Ki, 380, (1933).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Two-Component Spinors in General Relativity, Peter G. Bergmann, Physical Review, Vol. 107,No.2, p.624.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Tensor Analysis for Physicists, J. A. Schouten, 2nd edition, Dover Publications Inc., 1989.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Cyganski
    • 1
  • Page William S. 
    • 2
  1. 1.Worcester Polytechnic InstituteWorcester
  2. 2.Daneliuk & PageKingston

Personalised recommendations