Advertisement

A Study of the Mathematics Teaching Efficacy Beliefs of Primary Teachers

  • George Philippou
  • Constantinos Christou
Part of the Mathematics Education Library book series (MELI, volume 31)

Abstract

The affective domain has in recent years attracted much attention from the mathematics research community; empirical data seem to increasingly support expert opinion that affect plays a decisive role in the process of cognitive development. One of the less researched dimensions of the affective domain is teachers’ beliefs about the efficacy of their mathematics teaching. Though there are studies examining efficacy-beliefs with respect to mathematics learning, we have not been able to locate any study related to efficacy-beliefs with respect to teaching mathematics. Belief in one’s ability to overcome obstacles and bring about a predetermined outcome may be decisive in motivation to undertake the endeavour, and to put in time and resources. In this chapter, based on a sample in Cyprus, we examine primary school teachers’ efficacy-beliefs with respect mathematics teaching. From an analysis of self-reported questionnaires and interview data, it was found that teachers feel quite competent to teach mathematics, and that the level of efficacy improves, after diminishing during the initial career period. The preservice program seemed to make a difference to beliefs about the efficacy of their mathematics teaching; however, in general the teachers seemed to be critical about the preservice program they passed through. The findings of this study might have important implications for teacher preparation and teacher development in general.

Keywords

Mathematics Teaching Prospective Teacher School Climate Primary Teacher Efficacy Belief 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and actions: A social cognitive theory. Englwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control: New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  3. Boekaerts, M. (1999). Metacognitive experiences and motivational state as aspects of self-awareness: Review and discussion. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(4), 571–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bong, M., & Clark, R.E. (1999). Comparison between self-concept and self-efficacy in academic motivation research. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooney, T.J. (1994). Teacher education as an exercise in adaptation. In D. B. Aichele and A. Coxford (Eds.), Professional development for teachers of mathematics. Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 9–22). Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
  6. Deemer, S. A., & Minke, K. M. (1999). An investigation of the factor structure of the teacher efficacy scale. Educational Research, 93(1), 3–11.Google Scholar
  7. Goldin, G. A. (1998). Representational systems, learning, and problem solving in mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(2), 137–165.Google Scholar
  8. Guskey, T. R., & Passaro, P. D. (1999). Teacher efficacy: A study of construct dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 627–643.Google Scholar
  9. Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984) Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 569–582.Google Scholar
  10. Hackett, G., & Betz, N. E. (1989). An exploration of the mathematics self-efficacy /mathematics performance correspondence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 261–273.Google Scholar
  11. Hoy, W. K, & Woolfolk, A. E. (1993). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and the organizational health of schools. The Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 355–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Krainer, C. (1999). Promoting reflection and networking as an intervention strategy in professional development programs for mathematics teachers and mathematics teachers’ educators. In O. Zaslavsky (Ed.), Proceedings of the Conference PME23 Vol. 1. (pp. 59–168). Haifa: Technion.Google Scholar
  13. Lappan, G., & Theule-Lubienski, S. (1994). Training teachers or educating professionals? What are the issues and how are they being resolved? In D. Robitaille, D.H. Wheeler & C. Kieran (Eds.), Selected lectures from the 7th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 249–261). Quebec: Les Presses de Ľ Universite Laval.Google Scholar
  14. Masui, C., & De Corte, E. (1999). Enhancing learning and problem solving skills: Orienting and self-judging, two powerful and trainable learning tools. Learning and Instruction, 9, 517–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McLeod, D. B. (1994). Research on affect and mathematics learning in the JRME: 1970 to the present. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25.(6), 637–647.Google Scholar
  16. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(.3), 307–332.Google Scholar
  17. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Academic Settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578.Google Scholar
  18. Pajares, F. (1999). Current directions in self-efficacy research. In M. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement. Vol. 10 (pp. 1–49). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  19. Pajares, F., & Miller, D. 1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86.(2), 193–203.Google Scholar
  20. Philippou, G. N., & Christou, C. (1998). The Effects of a preparatory mathematics program in changing prospective teachers’ attitudes toward mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 35, 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Randhawa, B. S., Beamer, J. E., & Lundberg, I. (1993). Role of mathematics self-efficacy in the structural model of mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sicula (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (pp. 102–119). London: Prentice Hall International.Google Scholar
  23. Schoenfeld, A. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problemsolving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 334–370.) New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(1), 4–14.Google Scholar
  25. Soodak, L., C., & Podell, D. M. (1996). Teacher Efficacy: Toward the understanding of a multi-faceted construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12, 401–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Swafford, J. O. Teacher preparation. (1995). In I. M. Carl (Ed.), Prospects for School Mathematics (pp. 157–174). Reston VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  27. Thompson, A. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 127–145). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  28. Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher Efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202–248.Google Scholar
  29. Zaslavsky O., & Leikin R. (1999). Interweaving the training of mathematics teacher educators and professional development of mathematics teachers. In O. Zaslavsky (Ed.), Proceedings of the Conference PME23 Vol. 1 (pp. 143–158). Haifa: Technion.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • George Philippou
  • Constantinos Christou

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations