Child Custody Evaluations

Ackerman, M. J. & Ackerman, M. C. (1997). Custody Evaluation Practices: a Survey of Experienced Professionals (Revisited). Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28, 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

American Psychological Association. (1992). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

American Psychological Association (1994). Guidelines for Child Custody Evaluations in Divorce Proceedings. American Psychologist, 49.Google Scholar

Association of Family & Conciliation Courts (1994). Model Standards of Practice for Child Custody Evaluations. Madison, WI: Author.Google Scholar

Bray, J. (1991). Psychosocial factors affecting custodial and visitation agreements. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 9, (4), 419–437.Google Scholar

California, State of (1999). Rule 1257.3. Sacramento, CA: Author.Google Scholar

Emery, R. (1999). Marriage, Divorce, and Children’s Adjustment, 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Galatzer-Levy, R. & Kraus, L. (Eds.). (1999). The Scientific Basis of Child Custody Decisions. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Garrity, C. & Baris, M. (1994). Caught in the Middle. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Gindes, M. (1998). The psychological effects of relocation for children of divorce. Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, 15, (1), 119–148.Google Scholar

Gould, J. (1998). Conducting Scientifically Crafted Child Custody Evaluations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Gould, J. & Stahl, P. (2000). The Art and Science of Child Custody Evaluations: Integrating Clinical and Forensic Mental Health Models. Family & Conciliation Courts Review. 38, (3).Google Scholar

Johnston, J. (1994). High-Conflict Divorce. The Future of Children, 4, (1), 165–182.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Johnston, J. & Roseby, V. (1997). In the Name of the Child. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Kelly, J. (1994). The determination of child custody. In The Future of Children: Children & Divorce. The David and Lucille Packard Foundation, 300 Second Street, Los Altos, CA 94022.Google Scholar

Kelly, J. & Lamb, M. (2000). Using child development research to make appropriate custody and access decisions for young children. Family & Conciliation Courts Review. 38, (3), 297–311.Google Scholar

Lamb, M. (1997a). The Role of the Father in Child Development, 3rd Edition. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Lamb, M., Sternberg, K., & Thompson, R. (1997b). The Effects of Divorce and Custody Arrangements on Children’s Behavior, Development, and Adjustment. Family & Conciliation Courts Review. 35, (4), 393–404.Google Scholar

Maccoby, E. E., & Mnookin, R. H. (1992). Dividing The Child: Social And Legal Dimensions of Child Custody. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., & Slobogin, C. (1997). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for attorneys and mental health professionals (2nd ed.). New York: Guildford.Google Scholar

Millon, T. (1996). Disorders of Personality: DSM-IV and Beyond. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar

Otto, R. & Collins, R. (1995). Use of the MMPI-2/MMPI-A in child custody evaluations. In Y. Ben-Porath, J. Graham, G. Hall, R. Hirschman, & M. Zaragoza (Eds.), Forensic Applications of the MMPI-2. (pg. 222–252). Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Otto, R. Edens, J., & Barcus, E. The use of psychological testing in child custody evaluations. Family & Conciliation Courts Review. 38 (3), 312–340.Google Scholar

Shear, L. (1996). Life Stories, Doctrines, and Decision Making: Three High Courts Confront the Move-away Dilemma. Family & Conciliation Courts Review. 34, (4), 439–458.Google Scholar

Stahl, P. (1994). Conducting Child Custody Evaluations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Stahl, P. (1999). Complex Issues in Child Custody Evaluations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Stahl, P. (2000). Parenting After Divorce. Atascadero, CA: Impact Publishers.Google Scholar

Warshak, R. (1999). Parental Alienation Syndrome in Court. Monograph. Author.Google Scholar

Warshak, R. (1999). Social Science and Children’s Best Interests in Relocation Cases: Burgess Revisited. Monograph. Author.Google Scholar

Warshak, R. (2000). Blanket Restrictions: Overnight Contact Between Parents and Young Children. Family & Conciliation Courts Review. 38 (4), 422–445.Google Scholar