A Functional Approach to Motivation

The Role of Goal-Enactment and Self-Regulation in Current Research on Approach and Avoidance
  • Julius Kuhl


Depression Cortisol Coherence Hull Smoke 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, J. W., & Birch, D. (1970). The dynamics of action. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson, J. W., & Feather, N. T. (Eds.). (1966). A theory of achievement motivation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Baddeley, A. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Beck, A. T., & Freeman, A. (1991). Cognitive therapy of personality disorders. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  7. Biebrich, R., & Kuhl, J. (2000). Selbststeuerung und affektive Sensibilitiät: Persönlichkeits speziflsche Antezedentien der Depressivität [Self-regulation and affective sensitivity: Personality-based antecedents of depression]. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  8. Ciupka, B. (1991). Selbstregulation und Entscheidungen von Führungskräften [Self-regulation and decision-making in a group of managers]. Unpublished diploma thesis, University of Osnabrück, Germany.Google Scholar
  9. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In E. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 38. Perspectives on motivation (pp. 237–288). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dweck, C. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Easterbrook, J. A. (1959). The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychological Review, 66, 183–201PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ellis, J. (1996). Prospective memory or the realization of delayed intentions: A conceptual framework for research. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 1–22). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 390–405.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fuster, J. M. (1995). Memory and planning: Two temporal perspectives of frontal lobe function. In H. H. Jasper, S. Riggio, & P. S. Goldman-Rakic (Eds.), Epilepsy and the functional anatomy of the frontal lobe (pp. 9–18). New York: Raven.Google Scholar
  16. Gollwitzer, P. M., & Heckhausen, H. (1987). Breadth of attention and the counter-plea heuristic: Further evidence on the motivational vs. volitional mindset distinction. Unpublished manuscript, Max Planck Institute for Psychological Research, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
  17. Goschke, T., & Kuhl, J. (1993). The representation of intentions: Persisting activation in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1211–1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gray, J. A. (1987). The psychology of fear and stress (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Grolnick, W., Ryan, R. (1987). Autonomy in children’s learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 890–898.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haschke, R., & Kuhl, J. (1994). Action control and slow potential shifts. Proceedings of the 41st International Congress of Aviation and Space Medicine. Bologna, Italy: Monduzzi.Google Scholar
  21. Heckhausen, H. (1963). Hoffnung und Furcht in der Leistungsmotivation [Hope and fear in achievement motivation]. Meisenheim, Germany: Hain.Google Scholar
  22. Heckhausen, H., & Kuhl, J. (1985). From wishes to action: The dead-ends and short-cuts on the long way to action. In M. Frese & J. Sabini (Eds.), Goal-directed behavior: The concept of action in psychology (pp. 134–160). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. Humphreys, M. S., & Revelle, W. (1984). Personality, motivation, and performance: A theory of the relationship between individual differences and information-processing. Psychological Review, 91, 153–184.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Klinger, E. (1977). Meaning and void: Inner experience and the incentives in people’s lives. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kreps, M. (1997). Persönlichkeits-und Selbststeuerungsmaße zur Evaluation der Behandlungseffekte in einer psychosomatischen Fachklinik [Assessment of personality-styles and self-regulation components for evaluating treatment effects in a psychosomatic clinic]. Unpublished diploma-thesis, University of Osnabrück, Germany.Google Scholar
  26. Kuhl, J. (1972). Zum Problem der Eindimensionalität der Messung von Leistungsmotivation mittels des Heckhausen-TAT [One-dimensionality of the achievement motive as assessed by Heckhausen’s TAT scoring key]. Unpublished diploma thesis, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Germany.Google Scholar
  27. Kuhl, J. (1978). Situations-, reaktions-und personbezogene Konsistenz des Leistungsmotivs bei der Messung mittels des Heckhausen-TAT [Situational, response-related, and person-related consistency of the achievement motive as assessed by Heckhausen’s TAT scoring key]. Archiv für Psychologie, 130, 37–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kuhl, J. (1981). Motivational and functional helplessness: The moderating effect of state vs. action orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 155–170.Google Scholar
  29. Kuhl, J. (1983). Motivation, Konflikt und Handlungskontrolle [Motivation, conflict, and action control], Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Kuhl, J. (1985). Volitional mediators of cognitive-behavior consistency: Self-regulatory processes and actions versus state orientation. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 101–128). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  31. Kuhl, J. (1986). Motivation and information processing: A new look at decision making, dynamic change, and action control. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition. Foundations of social behavior (pp.404–434). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. Kuhl, J. (1994). A theory of action versus state orientation, In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation (pp. 9–46), Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  33. Kuhl, J. (2000). A functional-design approach to motivation and volition: The dynamics of personality systems interactions. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Self-regulation: Directions and challenges for future research (pp. 111–169). San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
  34. Kuhl, J. (in press-a). Motivation und Persönlichkeit: Interaktionen psychischer Systeme. [Personality and motivation: Interactions of mental system]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  35. Kuhl, J. (in press-b). The volitional basis of personality systems interaction theory: Applications in learning and treatment contexts. International Journal of Educational Research.Google Scholar
  36. Kuhl, J., & Baumann, N. (2000). Self-regulation and rumination: Negative affect and impaired self-accessibility. In W. Perrig & A. Grob (Eds.), Control of human behavior mental processes and consciousness: Essays in honor of the 60th birthday of August Flammer (pp. 283–305). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  37. Kuhl, J., & Beckmann, J. (1994). Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  38. Kuhl, J., & Geiger, E. (1986). The dynamic theory of the anxiety-behavior relationship: A study of resistance and time allocation, In J. Kuhl & J. W. Atkinson (Eds.), Motivation, thought, and action (pp. 76–93). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  39. Kuhl, J., & Kazén, M. (1994). Self-discrimination and memory: State orientation and false self-ascription of assigned activities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1103–115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kuhl, J., & Kazén, M. (1997). Persönlichkeits-Stil-und-Störungs-Inventar (PSSI): Handanweisung [Personality Styles and Disorders Questionnaire]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  41. Kuhl, J., & Kazén, M. (1999). Volitional facilitation of difficult intentions: Joint activation of intention memory and positive affect removes stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 382–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kuhl, J., & Scheffer, D. (1999). Der operante Multi-Motiv-Test (OMT): Manual [The Operant Multi-motive Test (OMT): Manual]. Osnabrück, Germany: University of Osnabrück.Google Scholar
  43. Kuhl, J., & Weiß, M. (1994). Performance deficits following uncontrollable failure: Impaired action control or global attributions and generalized expectancy deficits? In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation (pp. 317–328). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  44. LeDoux, J. E. (1995). Emotion: Clues from the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 209–235.Google Scholar
  45. Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McClelland, D. C. (1985). Human motivation. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
  47. McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L. (1953). The achievement motive. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  48. Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328–346.Google Scholar
  49. Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research (Vol. 4, pp.1–18). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  50. Papoušek, H. & Papoušek, M. (1987). Intuitive parenting: A dialectic counterpart to the infant’s integrative competence. In J. D. Osofsky (Ed.), Handbook of infant development (2nd ed., pp. 669–720). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  51. Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Nielson & Lydicke.Google Scholar
  52. Rosahl, S. K., Tennigkeit, M., Kuhl, J., & Haschke, R. (1993). Handlungskontrolle und langsame Hirnpotentiale: Untersuchungen zum Einfluß subjektiv kritischer Wörter (Erste Ergebnisse) [Action control and slow brain potential shuts: Experiments on the impact of subjectively critical words (Preliminary results]. Zeitschrift für Medizinische Psychologie, 2, 1–8.Google Scholar
  53. Ruble, D. N. (1994). A phase model of transitions: Cognitive and motivational consequences. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 163–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sapolsky, R. M. (1992). Stress, the aging brain, and the mechanism of neuron death. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  55. Scheffer, D., Keller, H., Kuhl, J. & Völker, S. (1998). Personality and parenting: Differential sensitivity to positive and negative affect and components of parenting in early mother-infant exchange. Unpublished manuscript, University of Osnabrück, Germany.Google Scholar
  56. Schwarz, N., Bless, H., & Bohner, G. (1991). Mood and persuasion: Affective states influence the processing of persuasive communications. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 161–201). San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
  57. Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (1995). Coherence and congruence: Two aspects of personality integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 531–543.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). Not all personal goals are personal: Comparing autonomous and controlled reasons for goals as predictors of effort and attainment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 546–557.Google Scholar
  59. Storms, L. H., & Broen, W. E., Jr. (1966). Drive theories and stimulus generalization. Psychological Review, 73, 113–127.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Sorrentino, R. M., Bobocel, D. R., Gitta, M. Z., & Olson, J. N. (1988). Uncertainty orientation and persuasion: Individual differences in the effects of personal relevance on social judments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sorrentino, R. M., Hewitt, E. C., & Raso-Knott, P. A. (1992). Risk-taking in games of chance and skill: Informational and affective influences on choice behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 522–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sutherland, R. W., & Rudy, J. W. (1989). Configurational association theory: The role of hippocampal formation in learning, memory and amnesia. Psychobiology, 17, 129–144.Google Scholar
  63. Trope, Y., & Neter, E. (1994). Reconciling competing motives in self-evaluation: The role of self-control in feedback seeking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 646–657.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Weiner, B. (1966). The role of success and failure in the learning of easy and complex tasks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 339–343.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Wheeler, M. A, Stuss, D. T., & Tulving, E. (1997). Toward a theory of episodic memory: The frontal lobes and autonoetic consciousness. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 331–354.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julius Kuhl
    • 1
  1. 1.Fach Diff. Psych. & Persönlichkeitsforschung, Fachbereich PsychologieUniversität OsnabrückOsnabrückGermany

Personalised recommendations