The Processes and Challenges of Conceptual Change

  • Michelene T. H. Chi
  • Rod D. Roscoe

Abstract

Students engaged in learning a large body of related knowledge often possess some incorrect naïve knowledge about the domain. These “misconceptions” must be removed and/or the correct conception must be built in order for students to achieve a deep understanding. This repair process is generally referred to as “conceptual change.” However, although conceptual change has been discussed for several decades within different research contexts, the literature nevertheless presents a somewhat blurry picture of what exactly misconceptions are, what constitutes conceptual change, and why conceptual change is difficult. In this chapter, we suggest that one should think of misconceptions as ontological miscategorizations of concepts. From this perspective, conceptual change can be viewed as a simple shift of a concept across lateral (as opposed to hierarchical) categories. We argue that this process is difficult if students lack awareness of when a shift is necessary and/or lack an alternative category to shift into. These ideas are explored using a detailed example (i.e. diffusion) from abroad class of science concepts (i.e. emergent processes) that are often robustly misunderstood by students.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carey, S. (1991). Knowledge acquisition: Enrichment or conceptual change? In S. Carey & R. Gelman (Eds.), The epigenesis of mind (pp. 257–291). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  2. Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science. In R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, (pp. 129–186). University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
  4. Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Creativity: Shifting across ontological categories flexibly. In T.B. Ward, S.M. Smith, R.A. Finke & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes. (pp. 209–234). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  5. Chi, M. T. H. (2000a). Cognitive understanding levels. In: Encyclopedia of Psychology, Vol. 2, Kazdin, A.E. (Ed.). Pp 172–175, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chi, M. T. H. (2000b). Self-explaining: The dual processes of generating inferences and repairing mental models. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in Instructional Psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  7. Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M. H., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanation improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chi, M. T. H., Siler, S. A., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. G. (In press). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science.Google Scholar
  9. De Leeuw, N. (1993). Students’ beliefs about the circulatory system: Are misconceptions universal? In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 389–393). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  10. De Leeuw, N., & Chi, M. T. H. (In preparation). Self-explanation, comprehension, and conceptual change. Chapter to appear in G.M. Sinatra and P.R. Pintrich (Eds.) Intentional Conceptual Change. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  11. diSessa (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 101–104.Google Scholar
  12. Ferrari, M., & Chi, M. T. H. (1998). The nature of naive explanations of natural selection. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 1231–1256.Google Scholar
  13. Gelman, S. A. (1988). The development of induction within natural kind and artifact categories. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 65–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gunstone, R.R., Champagne, A. B., & Klopfer, L. E. (1981). Instruction for Understanding: A case study. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 27, 27–32.Google Scholar
  15. Hempel, C. (1966). Laws and their role in scientific explanation. Philosophy of Natural Science, Chapter 5, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Hewson, P. W. (1981). A conceptual change approach to learning science. European Journal of Science Education, 3, 383–396.Google Scholar
  17. Jeong, H. (1998). Knowledge co-construction during collaborative learning. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  18. Keil, F. (1979). Semantic and conceptual development: An ontological perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Marek, E. A., Cowan, C. C., & Cavallo, A. M. L. (1986). Students’ misconceptions about diffusion: How can they be eliminated? The American Biology Teacher, 567, 74–77.Google Scholar
  20. McCloskey, M. (1983) Naive theories of motion. In D. Gentner & A.L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental Models (pp. 299–324). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  21. Osborne, R. J. & Wittrock, M. C. (1983). Learning science: A generative process. Science Education, 67, 489–508.Google Scholar
  22. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–27.Google Scholar
  23. Slotta, J. D., Chi, M. T. H, & Joram, E. (1995). Assessing students’ misclassifications of physics concepts: An ontological basis for conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 373–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sommers, F. (1971). Structural ontology. Philosophia, 1, 21–42.Google Scholar
  25. Thagard, P. (1990). Concepts and conceptual change. Syntheses, 82, 255–274.Google Scholar
  26. Thagard, P. (1996). The concept of disease: Structure and change. Communication and Cognition, 29, 445–478.Google Scholar
  27. Viennot, L. (1979). Spontaneous reasoning in elementary dynamics. European Journal of Science Education, 1, 205–21.Google Scholar
  28. Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wiser, M., & Carey, S. (1983). When heat and temperature were one. In D. Gentner & A. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 267–297). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michelene T. H. Chi
    • 1
  • Rod D. Roscoe
    • 1
  1. 1.Learning Research and Development CenterUniversity of PittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations