Advertisement

Collaborative Learning

  • Jos van der Linden
  • Gijsbert Erkens
  • Henk Schmidt
  • Peter Renshaw

Keywords

Collaborative Learning Cooperative Group Cooperative Learning Knowledge Construction Shared Meaning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, D., Carlson, H., & Hamm, M. (1990). Cooperative Learning & Educational Media. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Azmitia, M., and Perlmutter, M. (1989). Social influences on children’s cognition: State of Art and future directions. In: H.W. Reese (Ed.). Advances in Child Development and Behavior: New York: Academic Press, Pp. 89–144.Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, D., and Todd, F. (1977). Communication and Learning in small groups. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, N., and Dunne, E. (1991). The nature and quality of talk in co-operative classroom groups. Learning and Instruction, 1, 2, 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blumenfeld, P.C., Marx, R.W., Soloway, E & Krajcik, J. (1996). Learning with peers: from small group cooperation to collaborative communities. Educational Researcher, 25, 8, 37–40.Google Scholar
  6. Bos, M. (1938). Experimental study of productive collaboration. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  7. Bossert, S.T. (1988). Cooperative activities in the classroom. Review of Research in Education, 15, 225–253.Google Scholar
  8. Broekman, T.H.A. (1988). Leerlingen begeleiden leerlingen: Verslag van een proefproject. Nijmegen: Hoogveld Instituut.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, A.L. and Palincsar, A.S. (1989). Guided cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In: L.B. Resnick (Ed.). Knowing, Learning and Instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 393–453.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, J.S., Collins, A., and Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 32–42.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, R.A.J. (1994). Collective mathematical thinking in the primary classroom: A conceptual and empirical analysis within a Sociocultural framework. Bachelor of Educational Studies (Hons) Thesis, University of Queensland.Google Scholar
  12. Bruffee, K.A. (1999). Collaborative learning. Higher Education, Interdependence, and the authority of knowledge. 2 nd Edition. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Carpay, J. (1979). Over leerlingen gesproken. Openbare les. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit.Google Scholar
  14. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1, 1–35.Google Scholar
  15. Cowie, H. (1995). Cooperative group work: A perspective from the U.K. International Journal of Educational Research, 23, 3, 227–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crook, C. (1998). Children as computer users: the case of collaborative learning. Computers in Education, 30, 3–4, 237–247.Google Scholar
  17. Damon, W. & Phelps, E. (1989). Critical distinctions among three methods of peer education. International Journal of Educational Research, 58,(2), 9–19.Google Scholar
  18. De Grave, W. (1998). Probleemgestuurd leren als kennisconstructie. Maastricht: Universitaire Pers Maastricht.Google Scholar
  19. De Grave, W.S., Boshuizen, H.P.A., & Schmidt, H.G. (1996). Problem based learning: Cognitive and metacognitive processes during problem analysis. Instructional science, 24, 321–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dekker, R. and Elshout-Mohr, M. (1998). A process model for interaction and mathematical level raising. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36, 303–314.Google Scholar
  21. Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M. Blaye, A. & O’Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of Research on collaborative learning. In: E. Spada & P. Reiman (Eds.). Learning in Humans and Machines.Google Scholar
  22. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Collaborative learning. Cognitive and computational approaches. Amsterdam: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  23. Doise, W. and Mugny, G, (1984). The social development of the intellect. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  24. Draper, S. (1995). Computational modeling of constructive interaction: Relaxing the mutuality hypothesis. In: C. O’Malley (Ed.). Computer supported collaborative learning NATO ASI Series, Vol. 128, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, pp. 223–245.Google Scholar
  25. Dunne, E., & Bennett, N. (1990). Talking and learning in groups. London: Macmillan Education.Google Scholar
  26. Elbers, E., and Streefland, L. (1997 a). Learning by participation in a community of learners. Paper presented at the conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction. Athens: August 26–30.Google Scholar
  27. Elbers, E., and Streefland, L. (1997 b). Changing identities in the classroom. Paper presented at the conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction. Athens: August 26–30.Google Scholar
  28. Erkens, G. (1997). Coöperatief probleemoplossen met computers in het onderwijs (Cooperative problem solving with computers). Utrecht: Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
  29. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., Kirkus, V.B., and Miller, N. (1992). Implications of current research on cooperative interaction for classroom application. In: R. Hertz-Lazarowitz andGoogle Scholar
  30. Herz-Lazarowitz R & Miller, N. (Eds.). (1992). Interaction in cooperative groups. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hoek, D. (1998). Social and cognitive strategies in co-operative groups. Dventer: Quick Service drukkerijen Nederland BV.Google Scholar
  32. Hoek, D., Terwel, J. & Eeden, P. van den (1997). Effects of training in the use of social and cognitive strategies: An intervention study in secondary mathematics in co-operative groups. Educational Research and Evaluation, 3, 364–389.Google Scholar
  33. Hoogsteder, M. (1995). Learning through participation. Utrecht: h.D. thesis.Google Scholar
  34. Huber, G. L. (1995). Cooperative learning in German schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 23, 3, 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Huber, G.L. (Hrsg.) (1993). Neue Perspectiven der Kooperation. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren.Google Scholar
  36. Johnson, D.W. and Johnson, R.T. (1992). Positive interdependence: Key to effective Cooperation. In: R. Herz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.). Interaction in cooperative groups. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 174–203.Google Scholar
  37. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., and Smith, K.A. (1991). Cooperative Learning: Increasing College Faculty Instructional Productivity. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4 Washington, D.C.: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human development.Google Scholar
  38. Johnson, D.W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson, D., & Skon, L. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive and individual goal structure on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 47–62.Google Scholar
  39. Kampermann, A.W.T en Gerrichhauzen, J. (Red). (1995). Teambuilding. Deventer: Kluwer Bedrijfswetenschappen.Google Scholar
  40. Kanselaar, G. en Van der Linden, J.L. (1984). Leren door samenwerken. In: J. Lowyck en H.H. Tillema (Red.). Vormen van leren en onderwijzen in de klas. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger B.V.Google Scholar
  41. Kanselaar, G., Van der Linden, J.L. & Erkens, G. (1997). Samenwerkend leren. In: P. Leenheer, R.J. Simons en J. Zuylen (Red.). Didactische verkenningen van het studiehuis. Tilburg: MesoConsult B.V., 76–88.Google Scholar
  42. Katz, S. and Lesgold, A. (1993). The role of the tutor in Computer-based collaborative Learning Situations. In: S.P. Lajoie & S.J. Derry (Eds.). Computers as Cognitive tools. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Pp. 289–319.Google Scholar
  43. King, A. (1992). Facilitating elaborative learning through guided student-generated questioning. Educational Psychologist, 27, 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kumpulainen, K. (1996). The nature of peer interaction in the social context created by the use of word processors. Learning and Instruction, 6, 3, 243–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kwakman, F. en Postema, A. (1996). Het team als probleemoplosser. Deventer: Kluwer Bedrijfswetenschappen.Google Scholar
  46. Lamberigts, R. J. A. G. (1988). Coöperatief leren. In: B. Creemers ea. (Red.). Onderwijskundig Lexicon, C 1300. Alphen aan den Rijn: Samson.Google Scholar
  47. Lamberigts, R. J. A. G. (1990). De helpende leerling. In: B. Creemers ea. (Red.). Onderwijskundig Lexicon, 2345, Alphen aan den Rijn: Samson.Google Scholar
  48. Lamberigts, R.A.J.G., Verhagen, E.J., Gerris, J.R.M., & Campbell, H.W. (1986 a). Coöperatieve leergroepen in het onderwijs: doelstelling, karakteristieken en implementatie. Pedagogische Studiën, 63(5), 205–217.Google Scholar
  49. Lamberigts, R.A.J.G., Verhagen, E.J., Gerris, J.R.M., & Campbell, H.W. (1986 b). Coöperatieve leergroepen in het perspectief van onderzoek. Pedagogische Studiën, 63(6), 262–274.Google Scholar
  50. Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk among teachers and learners. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  51. Miller, N. (Eds.). Interaction in cooperative groups. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Pp. 253–281.Google Scholar
  52. Moust, J. (1993). De rol van tutoren in probleemgestuurd onderwijs. Maastricht: Universitaire Pers Maastricht.Google Scholar
  53. Nelissen, J. M.C. (1995). Interactief reken-wiskunde onderwijs. Tijdschrift voor nascholing en onderzoek van het reken-wiskunde onderwijs, 14, 1, 35–44.Google Scholar
  54. Nelissen, J.M.C. (1998). Representaties in het reken-wiskunde onderwijs. Pedagogische Studiën, 75, 169–183.Google Scholar
  55. Nelson-LeGall, S. (1992). Children’s instrumental help-seeking: Its role in the social acquisition and construction of knowledge. In: R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.). Interaction in cooperative groups. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 49–68.Google Scholar
  56. O’Connor, M.C. (1998). Can we trace the “Efficacy of Social Constructivism”? In: P.D. Pearson and A. Iran-Nejad (Eds.). Review of Research in Education. Washington: American Educational Research association, Pp. 25–72.Google Scholar
  57. O’Donnell, A.M. and Dansereau, D.F. (1992). Scripted cooperation in student dyads: A method for analyzing and enhancing Academic learning and performance. In: R. Herz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.). Interaction in cooperative groups. Cambridge: Cambridge university Press. Pp. 120–141.Google Scholar
  58. O’Donnell, A.M. & King, A. (Eds.). (1999). Cognitive perspectives on peer learning. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.Google Scholar
  59. Qin, Z., Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1995). Cooperative versus competitive efforts and problem solving. Review of Educational Research, 65, 2, 129–143.Google Scholar
  60. Renshaw, P.D. & Brown, R.A.J. (1997). Learning partnerships: The role of teachers in a community of learners. In: L. Logan & J. Sachs (Eds). Meeting the challenges of primary schools. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  61. Renshaw, P.D. & Brown, R.A.J. (submitted). Orchestrating different voices in student talk about infinity: theoretical and empirical analyses.Google Scholar
  62. Resnick, L.B. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 13–20.Google Scholar
  63. Roeders, P. (1995). Samen leren. Apeldoom: Garant.Google Scholar
  64. Rogoff, B. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative process. In: D. Kuhn and R.S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of Child Development, fifth edition, Vol. 2. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, pp. 679–744.Google Scholar
  65. Ros, A (1994 a). Samenwerking tussen leerlingen en effectief onderwijs. De invloed van de leerkracht. Groningen: RION.Google Scholar
  66. Ros, A (1994 b). Analyse en effecten van uitleg door leerlingen en leerkrachten. Groningen: RIONGoogle Scholar
  67. Saljö, R. (1997). Learning and Sociocultural change. Inaugural lecture. Utrecht: Utrecht University, June 13.Google Scholar
  68. Saljö, R. (in press). Learning as the use of tools: a sociocultural perspective on the human-technology link. To appear in K. Littleton & P. Light (Eds.). Learning and computers: Analyzing productive interactions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. Salomon, G. (Ed). (1993). Distributed Cognitions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Salomon, G. and Perkins, D.N. (1998). Individual and Social Aspects of learning. In: P.D. Pearson and A. Iran-Nejad (Eds.). Review of Research in Education. Washington: American Educational Research Association, Pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
  71. Schegloff, E. (1991). Conservation analysis and socially shared cognition. In: L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine & S.D. Teasly (Eds.). Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington: American Psychological Association, Pp. 150–171.Google Scholar
  72. Sharan, S. and Sharan, Y. (1976). Small-Group Teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  73. Slavin, R.E. (1983). Cooperative Learning. New York: Longman Inc.Google Scholar
  74. Slavin, R.E. (1992). When and why does cooperative learning increase achievement? Theoretical and empirical perspectives. In: R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.). Interaction in cooperative groups. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 145–174.Google Scholar
  75. Stevens, R.J., & Slavin, R.E. (1995). The cooperative Elementary school: Effects on students achievement, Attitudes and Social relations. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 2, 321–351.Google Scholar
  76. Terwel, J. (1986). Leren in coöperatieve groepen: theorie en onderzoek. In: A. Reints & J.C. Voogt (Red.). Naar beter onderwijs. Tilburg: Uitgeverij Zwijsen B.V., Pp. 71–100.Google Scholar
  77. Tjepkema, S. (1997). Zelfsturende teams: naar synergie tussen leren en werken? Opleiding & OntwikkelingGoogle Scholar
  78. Van Boxtel, C., van der Linden, J.L., & Kanselaar, G. (1997). Collaborative construction of conceptual understanding: interaction processes and learning outcomes emerging from a concept mapping and poster task. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 8, 3–4, 341–361.Google Scholar
  79. Van Boxtel, C., van der Linden, J.L., & Kanselaar, G. (in press). Stimulating deep processing in a collaborative learning environment. To appear in H. Cowie, D. van der Aalsvoort & N. Mercer (Eds). Social interaction in learning and instruction: the meaning of discourse for the construction of knowledge. Pergamon PressGoogle Scholar
  80. Van Boxtel, C., Van der Linden, J.L., & Kanselaar, G. (submitted). Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge.Google Scholar
  81. Van der Linden, J. L. (1988). Samenwerken en leren. In: N. Deen ea. (Red.). Handboek leerlingbegeleiding. 2340. Alphen aan den Rijn: SamsonGoogle Scholar
  82. Van der Linden, J.L. (1986). Samen problemen oplossen. In: S. Dijkstra en P. Span (Red.). Leerprocessen en instructie. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  83. Van der Linden, J.L. (1987 a). Samenwerken en leren in groepsverband. In: P. Span, J.M.C. Nelissen, H.F. Pijning en C. Dietvorst (Red.). Onderwijzen en leren. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
  84. Van der Linden, J.L. (1987 b). Samenwerken en leren in het onderwijs. In: J.H. Boonman & J.L. van der Linden (Red.). Taal, leren en Samenwerken in het onderwijs. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  85. Van der Linden, J.L., Erkens, G. & Barnard, Y.F. (1989). Social interaction in problem-solving activities. In: H. Mandl, E. De Corte, S.N. Bennett & H. Friedrich (Eds.). Learning and Instruction. Volume 2. 1. Oxford: Pergamon, 113–127.Google Scholar
  86. Van der Linden, J.L., Erkens, G., & Nieuwenhuysen, T. (1995). Gemeiasames Problemlösen in Grupen. Unterrichtswissenschaft, Zeitschrift fur Lernforshung, 23, 4, 301–315.Google Scholar
  87. Van Oers, B. (1987). Activiteit en begrip. Amsterdam: VU uitgeverij BV.Google Scholar
  88. Van Oudenhoven, J.P. (1992). Cooperative learning and achievement: a conditional relation Paper, presented at 25th International Congress of Psychology at Brussels, Belgium, July 19–24.Google Scholar
  89. Vedder, P. (1985). Cooperative learning: A study on processes and effects of cooperation between primary school children.’ s Gravenhage: Stichting voor onderzoek van het onderwijs.Google Scholar
  90. Vedder, P. en Bloemkolk, M. (1985). Samenwerken en probleemoplossen. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger BV.Google Scholar
  91. Veenman, S. (1998). Coöperatief leren: Voorstel en verantwoording van een schoolverbeteringsprogramma. Nijmegen: vakgroep onderwijskunde, K.U. Nijmegen.Google Scholar
  92. Webb, N.M. (1982). Student interaction and learning in small groups. Review of Educational Research, 52, 421–445.Google Scholar
  93. Webb, N.M. (1992). Testing a theoretical model of student interaction and learning in small groups. In: R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.). Interaction in cooperative groups. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 102–119.Google Scholar
  94. Webb, N.M. and Farivar, S. (1994). Promoting helping behavior in cooperative small groups in middle school mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 2, 369–395.Google Scholar
  95. Webb, N.M. and Palincsar, A.S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In: D.C. Berliner & R.C. Calfee (Eds.). Handbook of Educational Psychology. New York: Simon & Schuster Mac Millan, pp. 841–873.Google Scholar
  96. Wiersema, B. & Van Oudenhoven, J.P. (1992). Effects of cooperation on spelling achievement at three age levels (grades 2, 4 and 6). European Journal of Psychology of Education, VII, 95–108.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jos van der Linden
    • 1
  • Gijsbert Erkens
    • 1
  • Henk Schmidt
    • 2
  • Peter Renshaw
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Educational SciencesUtrecht UniversityCS UtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyMaastricht UniversityMD MaastrichtThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Graduate School of EducationUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations