Tracking Down the Knowledge Structure of Students

Anderson, J.R. (1985). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: W.H. Freeman & Company.Google Scholar

Bacdayan, P. (1998). Because problems are only the beginning: Practical techniques for measuring and tracking students’ knowledge structures. Paper presentation at the fifth EDINEB conference, Cleveland, Ohio.Google Scholar

Chi, M.T.H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: examples from learning and discovery in science. In R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models in science: Minnesota studies in philosophy of science. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Chi, M.T.H., Slotta, J.D., & De Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: a theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, Vol. 4,1: 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien A. (1985). In R. Driver, E. Guesne, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children’s ideas in science. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Gilbert, & Watts. (1983). Concepts, misconceptions and alternative conceptions: changing perspectives in science education. Science Education, 10, 61–98.Google Scholar

Horngren, C.T., & Foster, G. (1991). Cost accounting. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Layton, D. (1991). Science education and praxis: The relation of school science to practical action. Studies in science education, 19, 43–79.Google Scholar

Marton, F. (1988). Phenomenography and the art of teaching all things to all men. Göteborgs universitet: Fenomenografiska notiser 8.Google Scholar

Norman, D.A. (1983). Some observations on mental models. In D. Gentner, & A.L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental Models. Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

O’Rourke, B.K. (1998). Designing problems to differentiate the problem solving approaches of experts, novice and naive business economists. Paper presentation at the fifth EDINEB conference, Cleveland, Ohio.Google Scholar

Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosen, & B.B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.Google Scholar

Schank, R.C., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.Google Scholar

Taconis, R. (1995). Understanding based problem solving, towards qualification-oriented teaching and learning in physics education. Eindhoven: Ph.D.thesis.Google Scholar

Vernooij, A.T.J. (1993). Het leren oplossen van bedrijfseconomische problemen. Didactisch onderzoek naar kostprijs-en nettawinstvraagstukken in het voortgezet onderwijs. Rotterdam: dissertatie (Ph.D.thesis written in Dutch).Google Scholar

Vernooij, A.T.J. (1995a). Problem solving in management accounting, Economia, The Journal of the Association of European Economics Education 5, Part 1, Summer 1995.Google Scholar

Vernooij, A.T.J. (1995b). Problem solving strategies. In W.H. Gijselaers et al. (Eds.), Educational Innovation in Economics and Business Administration: The Case of Problem-Based Learning (69–77). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Vernooij, A.T.J. (1996).Der Einfluss unterschiedlicher fachlicher Strukturen auf die Entwicklung mentaler Repräsentationen. In P. Preiss & T. Tramm (Eds), Rechnungswesenunterricht und ökonomisches Denken. Didactische Innovationen für die kaufmännische Ausbildung (139–157). Wiesbaden: Gabler GmbH.Google Scholar

Vosniadou S. 1994. Capturing and modelling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction 4(1), 45–69.Google Scholar