Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Children’s Contextual Art Knowledge: Local Art and School Art Context Comparisons

  • Chapter
The Arts in Children’s Lives

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • The Arts, Education and Americans Panel. (1977). Coming to our senses: The significance of the arts for American education. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (1982). Art worlds. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blandy, D., & Congdon, K. (1991). Pluralistic approaches to art criticism. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University Popular Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, A. (1987). The closing of the American mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston, B. 0. (1996, October 28). Educating for the workplace through the arts. Business Week, pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broudy, H. S. (1982). Report on case studies on uses of knowledge. Chicago: Spencer Foundation

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S. (1989, April). Situated cognition and the cultures of learning. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference. San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, D. (1984). Applying color. Art Education. 37(l), 40–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, L. H. (1982). Instant art, instant culture: The unspoken policy in American schools. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, L. H. (1994). Adventures in art. Worcester, MA: Davis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheney, L. V. (1987). American memory. Washington, D.C.: National Endowment for the Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G., & Zimmerman, E. (1978). Walk in the right direction: A model for visual arts education. Studies in Art Education, 12(2), 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G., & Zimmerman, E. (1986). A framework for educating artistically talented students based on Feldman’s and Clark and Zimmerman’s models. Studies in Art Education 27(3), 115–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Congdon, K. (1986). The meaning and use of folk art speech in art criticism. Studies in Art Education, 27(3), 140–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncum, P. (1984). How 35 children born between 1724 and 1900 learned to draw. Studies in Art Education, 26(2), 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncum, P. (1989). Children’s unsolicited drawings of violence as a site of social contradiction. Studies in Art Education, 20(4), 249–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncum, P. (2001). Visual culture: Developments, definitions, and directions for art education. Studies in Art Education, 42, (2), 101–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efland, A. (1976). The school art style: A functional analysis. Studies in Art Education 7(2), 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E. W. (1997). Cognition and representation: A way to pursue the American dream? Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 348–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E. W. (1998). Does experience in the arts boost academic achievement? Art Education, 51(1), 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinstein, H. (1984). The metaphoric interpretations of paintings: Effects of the clustering strategy and relaxed attention exercises. Studies in Art Education, 25(2), 77–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. H. (1980). Beyond universals in cognitive development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • The J. Paul Getty Trust. (1985). Beyond creating: The place for art in America’s schools, Los Angeles, CA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, W. D. (1984). A discipline-based view of art education. Studies in Art Education, 25(4), 212–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, W. D. (1993). Developments in discipline-based art education (DBAE): From art education toward arts education. Studies in Art Education 14(2), 91–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamblen, K. A. (1984). The culture of aesthetic discourse (CAD): Origins, implications, and consequences. The Bulletin of the Caucus on Social Theory and Art Education, 4, 22–34. Hamblen, K. A. (1993a). Developmental models of artistic expression and aesthetic response: The reproduction of formal schooling and modernity. The Journal of Social Theory Art Education, 13, 37–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamblen, K. A. (1993b). Theories and research that support art instruction for instrumental outcomes. Theory Into Research, 32(4), 191–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamblen, K. A. (1997). Second generation DBAE. Visual Arts Research, 23(2), 98–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamblen, K. A., & Galanes, C. (1997). Instructional options for aesthetics: Exploring the possibilities. Art Education, 50(l), 74–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardiman, G. W. (1971). Identification and evaluation of trained and untrained observers’ affective responses to art object. Washington, DC: Office of Education Bureau of Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, E. D., Jr. (1987). Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes Group Executive Board. (1986). Tomorrow’s teachers: A report of the Holmes Group, East Lansing, MI: Holmes Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanier, V. (1970). Essays in art education: The development of one point of view. New York: MSS Educational Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanier, V. (1975). Objectives of art education: The impact of time. Peabody Journal of Educatio, 52(3), 180–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, R., Murtaugh, M., & de la Rocha, 0. (1984). The dialectic of arithmetic in grocery shopping. In B. Rogoff & R. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Development in social context (pp. 67–94). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, F. (1955). The growth of art in American schools. New York: Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McReynolds, T. (1990). An examination of discipline-based art education materials using criteria establishsed from discipline-based art education theory. Unpublished master’s thesis, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. A. (1983). Art and adolescence: Teaching art at the secondary level. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, M. J. (1987). How we understand art: A cognitive developmental account of aesthetic experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1989). Are cognitive skills context-bound? Educational Research, 18(1), 16–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B., & Lave, J. (Eds) (1984). Everyday cognition: Its development in social context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. (1989). A desert landscape: Art education’s inattention to secondary education. Studies in Art Education, 30(3), 188–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankiewicz, M. A. (2000). Discipline and the future of art education. Studies in Art Education, 41 (4), 301–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. (1974). The superheroes of J. C. Holz: Plus an outline of a theory of child art. Art Education, 27(8), 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. (1985). History of children’s styles of art: Possibilities and prospects. In B. Wilson & H. Hoffa (Eds.), The history of art education: Proceedings from the Penn State Conference (pp. 177–184). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. (1997). The quiet evolution. Los Angeles: The J. Paul Getty Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B., Hurwitz, A., & Wilson, M. (1987). Teaching drawing from art. Worchester, MA: Davis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B., & Wilson, M. (1977). Art iconoclastic view of the imagery sources in the drawings of young people. An Education, 30(1), 412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, E., & Hetland, L. (eds.). (2000). The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34 (3/4).

    Google Scholar 

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Karen A. Hamblen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA

    Liora Bresler

  2. The Pennsylvania State University, USA

    Christine Marmé Thompson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hamblen, K.A. (2002). Children’s Contextual Art Knowledge: Local Art and School Art Context Comparisons. In: Bresler, L., Thompson, C.M. (eds) The Arts in Children’s Lives. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47511-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47511-1_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0471-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47511-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation