Advertisement

ECSCW ’99 pp 139-158 | Cite as

The Adoption and Use of ‘BABBLE’: A Field Study of Chat in the Workplace

  • Erin Bradner
  • Wendy A. Kellogg
  • Thomas Erickson

Abstract

One way to gain a principled understanding of computer-mediated communication (CMC) use in the wild is to consider the properties of the communication medium, the usage practices, and the social context in which practices are situated. We describe the adoption and use of a novel, chat-like system called BABBLE. Drawing on interviews and conversation logs from a 6-month field study of six different groups at IBM Corporation (USA), we examine the ways in which the technical properties of the system enable particular types of communicative practices such as waylaying and unobtrusive broadcast. We then consider how these practices influence (positively or negatively) the adoption trajectories of the six deployments.

Keywords

Critical Mass Communicative Practice Technical Property Computer Support Cooperative Work Summer Intern 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackerman, M. and Palen, L. (1996). “The Zephyr help instance: Promoting ongoing activity in a CSCW system,” Proceedings of CHI’ 96. ACM, New York, pp. 263–275.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, L., Toomey, L., and Churchill, E. (1999). “Distributed research teams: Meeting asynchronously in virtual space,” Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’99), IEEE.Google Scholar
  3. Bowers, J. (1994). “The work to make a network work: Studying CSCW in action,” Proceedings of CSC W’94, Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 287–297.Google Scholar
  4. Churchill, E.F. and Bly, S. (1999). “Virtual environments at work: Ongoing use of MUDS in the workplace,” Proceedings of WACC’99, February 22–25, 1999, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  5. Correll, S. (1995). “The ethnography of an electronic bar,” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 270–298.Google Scholar
  6. Doppke, J., Heimbinger, D., Wolf, A. (1998). “Software process modeling and execution within virtual environments,” ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, vol. 7, no. 1, January 1998, pp. 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ehrlich, S.E. (1987). “Strategies for encouraging successful adoption of office communication systems,” ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, vol. 5, pp. 340–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Erickson, T., Smith, D.N., Kellogg, W.A., Laff, M.R., Richards, J.T., and Bradner, E. (1999). “Socially translucent systems: Social proxies, persistent conversation, and the design of ‘Babble’,” Proceedings of CHI’ 99 (Pittsburgh, PA May 15–20), ACM, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Fish, R., Kraut, R. E., Root, R., Rice, R. (1993). “Video as a technology for informal communication,” Communications oft he ACM, vol. 36, no. I, January 1993, pp. 48–61.Google Scholar
  10. Gaver, W. (1991). “Technology affordances,” Proceedings of CHI 1991 (New Orleans, Louisiana, April 28–May 2, 1991) ACM. New York, pp. 79–84.Google Scholar
  11. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  12. Greenhalgh, C. and Benford S. (1995). “Massive: A virtual reality system for teleconferencing,” ACM Transactions on Computer Human Interfaces, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 239–261.Google Scholar
  13. Grudin, J. (1988). “Why CSCW applications fail: Problems in the design and evaluation of organizational interfaces,” Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’ 88), Portland OR, pp. 85–93.Google Scholar
  14. Grudin, J. & Palen, L.: (1995) “Why Groupware Succeeds: Discretion or Mandate?,” Proceedings of ECSCW’95, European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW’ 95), pp. 263–278.Google Scholar
  15. Heath, C. and Lug, P. (1991). “Collaborative Activity and Technological Design: Task Coordination in London Underground Control Rooms,” Proceedings of ECSCW’92, European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 65–80.Google Scholar
  16. Kovalainen, M., Robinson, M., Auramäki, E. (1998). “Diaries at work,” Proceedings of CSCW’ 92 (Seattle, WA), November 14–18. ACM, New York, pp. 49–58.Google Scholar
  17. Markus, M. L. (1990). “Toward a ‘critical mass’ theory of interactive media,” In J. Fulk and C. W. Steinfield (eds.), Perspectives on Organizations and New Information Technology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  18. Markus, M. L. and Connolly, T. (1990). “Why CSCW applications fail: Problems in the adoption of interdependent work tools,” Proceedings of ACM CSC W’90 Conference, pp. 371–380.Google Scholar
  19. McDonald, D., and Ackerman, M. (1998). “Just talk to me: A field study of expertise location,” Proceedings of CSCW’ 92 (Seattle, WA), November 14–18, ACM, New York, pp. 315–324.Google Scholar
  20. McGrath, A. (1999). “The Forum: Helping people who cannot be together, work together,” SIGGROUP Bulletin, vol. 19 no. I, ACM, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Norman, D. (1988). The Psychology of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  22. O’Day, V.L., Bobrow, D.G., and Shirley, M. (1996). “The social-technical design circle. In,” M.S. Ackerman (ed.), Proceedings of the ACM 1996 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 160–169.Google Scholar
  23. Orlikowski, W. (1992). “Learning from Notes: Organizational issues in groupware implementation,” Proceedings of CSCW’92, Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 362–369.Google Scholar
  24. Pirolli, P. and Card, S.K. (1995). “Information foraging in information access environments,” Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing, CHI’ 95, (Denver, CO), ACM Press, pp. 51–58.Google Scholar
  25. Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  27. Watts, J., Woods, D., Corban, J., Patterson, E. Kerr R, Hicks L.C.(1996). “Voice Loops as Cooperative Aids in Space Shuttle Mission Control,” Proceedings of CSC’ W’96, Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 48–56.Google Scholar
  28. Wojeik, R., Fuchs, L., Poltrock S. (1999). “Business value of 3D collaborative virtual environments,” SIGGROUP Bulletin, Vol. 19, No. 1, ACM, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erin Bradner
    • 1
  • Wendy A. Kellogg
    • 2
  • Thomas Erickson
    • 2
  1. 1.University of California at IrvineUSA
  2. 2.IBM T.J. Watson Research CenterUSA

Personalised recommendations