Advertisement

ECSCW ’99 pp 21-40 | Cite as

The Manufaktur: Supporting Work Practice in (Landscape) Architecture

  • Monika Büscher
  • Preben Mogensen
  • Dan Shapiro
  • Ina Wagner

Abstract

We describe fieldwork with (landscape) architects in which we identify key features of their work settings. We analyse the ways in which materials, many of them graphic and visual, are assembled, arranged and manipulated as an integral aspect of their work. We describe an early prototype of a 3D environment to provide a digitally-enhanced work setting, the organisation of which will emerge from use by practitioners.

Keywords

Work Setting Landscape Architect Town Hall Layout Plan Landscape Architecture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benford, S. Ingram, R., & Bowers. J. (1996). Building virtual cities: Applying urban planning principles to the design of virtual environments. Proc. ACM Conference on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST’96), Hong Kong, July, New York NY: ACM.Google Scholar
  2. Benford, S., & Snowdon, D. (1997). Informing the design of collaborative environments, in Proceedings. GROUP’97 (Phoenix, Arizona, Nov.16–19, 1997), New York NY: ACM.Google Scholar
  3. Card, S.A., Robertson, G. & Mackinlay, J. (1991). The Information Visualiser and Information Workspace. Proc. CHI’91, New York NY: ACM, pp. 181–188.Google Scholar
  4. Chalmers, M. and Chitson, P. 1992. Bead: Explorations in Information Visualisation. In Proc. SIGIR’92, published as a special issue of SIGIR forum, ACM Press, pp. 330–337, June 1992.Google Scholar
  5. Colebourne, A., Mariani, J. & Rodden, T. (1996) Q-PIT: A Populated Information Terrain, in G. Grinstein & R. Erbacher (eds) Visual Data Exploration and Analysis Ill, pp. 12–22.Google Scholar
  6. Gray, P.D., Waite, K.W., & Draper, S.W. (1990) Do-It-Yourself Iconic Displays. Human-Computer Interaction — INTERACT’ 90, D. Diaper et al (Eds.), Elsevier Science (N Holland), pp. 639–644.Google Scholar
  7. Grønbæk, K., & Mogensen, P. (1997). Informing General Product Development through Cooperative Design in Specific work domains. CSCW: The Journal of Collaborative Computing, 6, 275–304.Google Scholar
  8. Grønbæk, K., Kyng, M., & Mogensen, P. (1993). CSCW Challenges: Cooperative Design in Engineering Projects. Communications of the ACM, 36(6), 67–77.Google Scholar
  9. Lainer, R. & Wagner, I. (1998). Connecting Qualities of Social Use with Spatial Qualities. Cooperative Buildings — Integrating Information, Organization, and Architecture. Proc. CoBuild’98. Eds Streitz, N. et al., Springer: Heidelberg, pp. 191–203.Google Scholar
  10. Latour, B., Drawing Things Together, in Representation in Scientific Practice, M. Lynch and S. Woolgar, Editors. 1990, Kluwer: Amsterdam. p. 19–68.Google Scholar
  11. Law, J., Notes on the Theory of Actor-Network: ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 1992. 5(4): p. 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mariani, J. (1998). Chs. 1 & 7 in eSCAPE Deliverable 3.1 Lancaster University. ISBN: 1-862220-052-1 (available from: http://escape.lancs.ac.uk)Google Scholar
  13. Mitchell, W.J.T., 1994. Picture Theory. Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Büscher, M., Kompast, P., Lainer, R. Wagner, I. (1999). Space for Inspiration: Ethnography and User Involvement in Designing the Wunderkammer. Proc. Workshop on Ethnographic Studies in Real and Virtual Environments, Edinburgh, Jan 24–26.Google Scholar
  15. Olsen, K.A., Korfhage, R, Sochats, K., Spring, M. & Williams, J. (1993). Visualisation of a Document Collection: The VIBE System, in: Information Processing and Management, 29:1, pp. 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Star, S.L. & Griesemer, J. (1989) Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects. Social Studies of Science, 19: pp. 387–420.Google Scholar
  17. Stenius, M., Frecon, E., Fahlen, L., Simsarian, K. Bino (1998). Ch. 5: The Web Planetarium Prototype — Visualising the Structure of the Web. In eSCAPE Deliverable 3.1 (available as above).Google Scholar
  18. Tellioglu H., Wagner I. & Lainer R (1998). Open Design Methodologies. Exploring architectural practice for systems design. Proc. PDC’98, Seattle, November 12–14.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Monika Büscher
    • 1
  • Preben Mogensen
    • 2
  • Dan Shapiro
    • 1
  • Ina Wagner
    • 3
  1. 1.Lancaster UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Arhus UniversityDenmark
  3. 3.Vienna Technical UniversityAustria

Personalised recommendations