Secondary Teachers’ Knowledge and Beliefs about Subject Matter and their Impact on Instruction

  • Julie Cess-Newsome
Part of the Science & Technology Education Library book series (CTISE, volume 6)


Science Teaching Subject Matter Preservice Teacher Science Teacher Content Knowledge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, P. E., & Krockover, G. H (1997). Concerns arid perceptions of beginning secondary science and mathematics teachers. Science Education, 81(1), 29–50. teaching and learning: A case study in preservice science education. International Journal of Science Education, 12(4), 381–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, P. A., & Dochy, F. J. R. C. (1995). Conceptions of knowledge and beliefs: A comparison across varying cultural and educational communities. American Educational Research JournalGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander, P. A., Schallert, D. L., & Hare, V. C. (1991). Coming to terms: How researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge. Review of educational Research, 61(3), 315–343.Google Scholar
  4. American Association for the Advancement of the Sciences. (1990). Science for all Americans: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, C. W. (1989). The role of education in the academic disciplines in teacher education. In Woolfolk, A. E. (Ed.), Research perspectives on the graduate preparation of teachers (pp. 88–107) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematical understandings that preservice teachers bring to teacher education. Elementary School Journal, 90(4), 449–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ball, D. I,. (1991)a. Research on teaching mathematics: Making subject-matter knowledge part of the equation. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 1–48). Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
  8. Ball, D. L. (1991)b. Teaching mathematics for understanding: What do teachers need to know about the subject matter? In M Kennedy (Ed.). Teaching academic subjects to diverse learners. (pp. 63–83). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  9. Ball, D. L., & McDiarmid, G. W. (1990). The subject-matter preparation of teachers. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 437–449). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Barba, R. H., & Rubba, P. A. (1992). A comparison of preservice and in-service earth and space science teachers’ general mental abilities, content knowledge. and problem solving skills. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(10), 1021–1035.Google Scholar
  11. Baturo, A., & Nason, R. (1996). Student teachers’ subject matter knowledge within tho domain of area measurement. Educational Studies in Mathermatics, 31(3). 235–268.Google Scholar
  12. Baxter, J., Richert, A. E., & Saylor. C. (1985). Content andprocess in hroiogy knowledge Growth in a Profession Publication Series). Stanford, CA: Stanford university, School of Education.Google Scholar
  13. Beane, J. A. (1995). Curriculum integration and the disciplines of knowledge. Phi Delta Kuppan. 76(8). 616–622.Google Scholar
  14. Benson, G. D. (1989). Epistemology and science curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21(4). 329–344.Google Scholar
  15. Rerman, P., & McLaughlin, M. (1975). Federal programs supporting educational change: Vol IV. The findings in review. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
  16. Borko, H & Livingston, C. Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert andnovice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 473–498.Google Scholar
  17. Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers’ beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 53–62.Google Scholar
  18. Brickhouse, N., & Bodner, G. M. (1992). The beginning science teacher: Classroom narratives of convictions and constraints. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(5), 471–485.Google Scholar
  19. Brookhart, S. M., & Freeman, D. J. (1992). Characteristics of entering teacher candidates. Review of Educational Research, 62(1), 37–60.Google Scholar
  20. BulloughR. V., Jr. (1989). First year teacher: A case study. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  21. BulloughR. V., Jr., & Baughman, K. (1997). “First year teacher” eight years later: An inquiry into teacher development. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  22. Buchmann, M., & Schwille, J. (1983). Education: The overcoming of experience. American Journal of Education, 92(I), 30–51.Google Scholar
  23. Carlsen, W. S. (199la). Subject-matter knowledge and science teaching: A pragmatic perspective. Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 2, pp.115–186). Greenwick CT: JAI.Google Scholar
  24. Carlsen, W. S. (1991b). Effects of new biology teacher’ subject-matter knowledge on curricular planning. Science Education, 75(6), 631–647.Google Scholar
  25. Carlsen, W. S. (1993). Teacher knowledgeand discourse control: Quantitative evidence from novice biology teacher’ classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(5), 417–481.Google Scholar
  26. Champagne, A. B., Klopfer, L. E., Desena, A. T., & Squires, D. A. (1981). Structural representations of student’s knowledge before and after science instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 18(2), 97–111.Google Scholar
  27. Clark. C., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teacher’ thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research in teaching (3rd ed., pp. 255–296). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Clermont, C. P., Borko, H., & Krajcik, J. S. (1994). Comparative study of the pedagogical content knowledge of experienced and novice chemical demonstrators. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(4), 419–441.Google Scholar
  29. Cohen, D. K. (1995). What is the system in systemic reform? Educational Researcher, 24(9), 11–17, 3 I.Google Scholar
  30. Cornett, J. W., Yeotis, C., & Terwilliger, L. (1990). Teacher personal practical theories and their influence upon teacher curricular and instructional actions: A case study of a secondary science teacher. Science Education, 74(5), 517–523.Google Scholar
  31. Cornett, J. W. (1990). Teacher thinking about curriculum and instruction: A case study of a secondary social studies teacher. Theory and Research in Social Education. 18(3), 248–273.Google Scholar
  32. Cronin-Jones, L. L. (1991). Science teacher beliefs and their influence on curriculum implementations: Two case studies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(3), 235–250.Google Scholar
  33. Czerniak, C., & Lumpe, A. T. (1996). Relationship between teacher beliefs and science education reform. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 7(4), 247–266.Google Scholar
  34. Dobey, D. C., & Schafer, L. E. (1984). The effects of knowledge on elementary science inquiry teaching. Science Education, 68(I), 39–51.Google Scholar
  35. Donald, J. G. (1983). Knowledge structures: Methods for exploring course content. Journal of Higher. Education, 54(1), 31–41.Google Scholar
  36. Doyle, W. (1386). Classroom organization and management. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research in teaching (3rd ed., pp. 392–431). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  37. Doyle, W. (1977). Learning the classroom environment: An ecological analysis. Journal of Teacher Education. 28(6), 51–55.Google Scholar
  38. Druva, C. A., & Anderson, R. D. (1983). Science teacher characteristics by teacher behavior and by student outcome: A meta-analysis of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(5), 467–479.Google Scholar
  39. Duffee, L., & Aikenhead, G. (1992). Curriculum change, student evaluation, and teacher practical knowledge. Science Education. 76(5), 493–506.Google Scholar
  40. Dunkin, M. J., & Biddle, B. J. (1974). The study of teaching. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
  41. Duschl. R. A,, & Wright, E. (1989). A case study of high school teacher’ decision making models for planning and teaching science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 26(6), 467–501.Google Scholar
  42. Eraut, M. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. Washington, DC: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  43. Even, R. (1993). Subject-matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: Prospective secondary teachers and the function concept. Journal for Research in Mathermatics Education, 24(2), 94–116.Google Scholar
  44. Ferguson P., & Womack S. T. (1993). The impact of subject matter and education coursework on teaching performance. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(1), 55–63.Google Scholar
  45. Gagne, R. M., & Glaser, R. (1987). Foundations in learning research. In R. M. Gagne (Ed.) instructional technology: Foundations (pp. 49–83). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Edbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  46. Gallagher, J.J. (1991). Prospective and practicing secondary schools science teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science. Science Education, 75(1), 121–133.Google Scholar
  47. Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N.G. (1995). Biology teachers’ perceptions of subject matter structure and its relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(3), 301–325.Google Scholar
  48. Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N.G. (1993). Preservice biology teachers’ knowledge structuresas a function of professional teacher education: a year-long assessment. Science Education, 77(1), 25–45.Google Scholar
  49. Grossman, P.L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  50. Grossman, P.L. (1991). What are we talking about anyway? Subject matter knowledge of secondary English teachers. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 245–264). Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
  51. Grossman, P., & Stodolsky, S.S. (1994). Considerations of content and the circumstances of secondary school teaching. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 20, pp. 179–221). Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  52. Grossman, P.L., & Stodolsky, S.S. (1995). Content as context The role of school subjects in secondary school teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(8), 5–11, 23.Google Scholar
  53. Grossman, P.L., Wilson, S.M., & Shulman, L.S. (1989). Teachers of substance: Subject matter knowledge for teaching.In M C. Reyoolds (Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teacher. (pp 23–36). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  54. Gudmundsdottir, S. (1990). Values in pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 44–52.Google Scholar
  55. Gudmundsdottir, S. (1991). Pedagogical models of subject-matter. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 265–304). Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
  56. Gudmundsdottir, S., & Shulman, L (1987). Pedagogical content knowledge in social studies. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 31(2), 59–70.Google Scholar
  57. Guyton, E., & Farokhi, E. (1978). Relationships among academic performance, basic skills, subject matter knowledge, and teaching skills of teacher education graduates. Journal of Teacher Education, 38(5), 37–42.Google Scholar
  58. Haney, J. J., Czerniak, C. M., & Lumpe, A. T. (1996). Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(9), 971–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hashweh, M. (1987). Effects of subject matter knowledge in the teaching of biology and physics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3(2), 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Haqhweh, M.Z. (1996). Effectsof Science teachers’ epistemological beliefs in teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 47–63.Google Scholar
  61. Hauslein, P. L., Good, R. G., & Cummins, C. L. (1992). Biology content cognitive structure: From science student to science teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(9), 939–964.Google Scholar
  62. Hiebert, J., & Carpenter. T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathermatics Teaching and Learning (pp. 65–97). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  63. Hollingsworth, S. (1989). Prior beliefs and cognitive change in learning to teach. American Education Research Journal, 26(2), 160–189.Google Scholar
  64. Hollon, R. E., Roth, K. J., & Anderson, C. W. (1991). Science teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 145–186). Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
  65. Hoz, R., Tomer, Y., & Tamir, P. (1990). The relations between disciplinary and pedagogical knowledg and the length of teaching experience of biology and geography teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 27(10), 973–985.Google Scholar
  66. Kennedy, M. M. (1990). Teacher’s Subject matter knowledge (Trends and Issues Paper No. 1). Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on’ Teacher Education.Google Scholar
  67. King, B. B. (1991). Beginning teachers’ knowledge of and attitudes towards history andphilosophy of science. Science Education, 75(1), 135–141.Google Scholar
  68. Iacey, C. (1977). The socialization of teachers. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  69. Lantz, O., & Kass. H (1987). Chemistry teachers’ functional paradigms. Science Education. 71(1), 117–134.Google Scholar
  70. Isderman, N. G. (January, 1995). Teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: Factors that mediate translation into classroom practice. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science. Charleston. WV.Google Scholar
  71. Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331–359.Google Scholar
  72. Lederman, N. G. (1986). Relating teaching behavior and classroom climate to changes in students’ conceptions of the nature of science. Science Education, 70(1), 3–19.Google Scholar
  73. Lederman, N. G., Gess-Newsome, J., & Latz, M.S. (1994). The nature and development of preservice teachers’ conceptions of subject matter and pedagogy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 129–146.Google Scholar
  74. Lederman. N. G., & Latz, M. S. (1995). knowledge structures in the preservice science teacher: Sources, development, interactions, and relationships to teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 6(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
  75. Lederman, N., & Zeidler, D. (1987). Science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: Do they really influence teaching behavior’? Science Education, 71(5), 721–734.Google Scholar
  76. MacDonald, D. (1996). Making both the nature of science and science subject matter explicit intents of science teaching. Journal of Science Tencher Education, 7(3), 183–196.Google Scholar
  77. McDiarmid, G. W., Ball, D. L & Anderson. C. W. (1989). Why staying one chapter ahead doesn’t really work: Subject-specific pedagogy. In M.C. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teacher, (pp 193–205). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  78. McEwan, H., & Bull, B. (1991). The pedagogic nature of subject matter knowledge. American Educational Research Journal, 28(2), 316–334.Google Scholar
  79. Morine-Dershimer, G. (1990, April). To think like a teacher. Vice-Presidential Address presented at Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  80. Morine-Dershimer, G. (1989). Preservice teachers’ conceptions of content and pedagogy: Measuring growth in reflective, pedagogical decision-making. Journal of Teacher Education, 40(5), 46–52.Google Scholar
  81. Mosenthal, J. H & Ball, D. L. (1992). Constructing new forms of teaching: Subject matter knowledge in inservice teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 43(5), 347–356.Google Scholar
  82. National Research Council. (1996). National Science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  83. National Council of Teachers of Mathermatics. (1991). Professional standardsfor teaching mathermatics. Reston, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  84. Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317–328.Google Scholar
  85. Newmann, F. M (1993). Beyond common sense in educational restructuring: Issues of content and linkage. Educational Researcher, 22(2). 4–13, 22.Google Scholar
  86. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educationol Research, 62(3), 307–332.Google Scholar
  87. Peterson, P. I,., Fennema, E., & Carpenter. T. P. (1991). Teachers’ knowledge of students’ mathematics problem-solving knowledge. In J. Brophy (Ed.). Advances in research on teacbing (Vol. 2. pp, 49–86). Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
  88. Phillips, D. C. (1983). On describing a student’s cognitive structure. Educational Psychologist, 18(2), 59–74.Google Scholar
  89. Porter, A. C., & Freeman, D. J. (1986). Professional orientations: An essential domain for teacher testing. Journal of Negro Education, 55, 284–292.Google Scholar
  90. Post, T. R., & Cramer, K. A. (1989). Knowledge. representation, and quantitative thinking. In M. C. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teacher. (pp. 221–231). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  91. Powell, R. (1994). From field science to classroom science: A case study of constrained emergence in a second-career science teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(3), 273–291.Google Scholar
  92. Putnam, R. T. (1987). Structuring and adjusting content for students: A study of live and simulated tutoring of addition. American Educational Research Journal, 24(1), 13–48Google Scholar
  93. Raudenbush, S. W., Rowan, B., & Cheong, Y. F. (1993). Higher order instructional goals in secondary schools: Class, teacher, and school influences. American Educational Research Journal. 30(3), 523–553.Google Scholar
  94. Reynolds, A. (1992). What is competent beginning teaching? A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 62(I), 1–35.Google Scholar
  95. Reynolds, A,, Haymore, J., Ringstaff; C., & Grossman, P. (1988). Teachers and curricular materials: Who is driving whom? Curriculum Perspectives, 8(1), 22–29.Google Scholar
  96. Rodriguez, A. J. (1993). A dose of reality: Understanding the origin of the theory/practice dichotomy in teacher education from the students’ point of view. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(3), 213–222.Google Scholar
  97. Roehler. L. R., Duffy, G. G., Herrmann, B. A,, Conley, M & Johnson, J. (1988). Knowledge structures as evidence of the ‘personal’: Bridging the gap from thought to practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 20(2), 159–165.Google Scholar
  98. Rubba, P., & Andersen, H (1978). Development of an instrument to assess secondary school students’ understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge. Science Education, 62(4), 449–458.Google Scholar
  99. Sanders, L. R., Borko, H., & Lockard, J. D. (1993). Secondary science teachers’ knowledge base when teaching science courses in and out of their area of certification. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(7), 723–736.Google Scholar
  100. Schwah, J. J. (1978). Education and the structure of the disciplines. In 1. Westhury & N. J. Wilkof (Eds.), Science, curriculum. and liberal education (pp 229–272). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Originally published in 1961).Google Scholar
  101. Shavelson, R. J. (1974). Methods for examining representations of subject-matter structure in a student’s memory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, II(3), 231–249.Google Scholar
  102. Shavelson, R. J., & Stern, P. (1981). Research on teachers’ pedagogical thoughts, judgements, decisions, and behavior. Review of Educational Research, 51(4), 455–498.Google Scholar
  103. Shuell, T. J. (1986). Cognitive conceptions of learning. Review of Educational Research, 51(4). 411–436.Google Scholar
  104. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1). 1–22.Google Scholar
  105. Shulman, L. S. (1986a). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.). Third Handhook of Research on Teaching (3rd ed., pp.3–36). New York: Mamiillan.Google Scholar
  106. Shulman L.S. (1986h). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(1), 4–14.Google Scholar
  107. Siskin, L. S. (1994). Realms of knowledge: Academic departments in secondary schools. Washington, DC: Falmer PressGoogle Scholar
  108. Smith, D. C., & Neale, D. C. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching. Teacher and Teacher Education, 5(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
  109. Smith, D. C., & Neale, D. C. (1991). The construction of subject-matter knowledge in primary science teaching. In J. Brophy (Ed.). Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 187–244). Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
  110. Sternberg, R. J., & Horvath J. A. (1995). A prototype view of expert teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(6), 9–17.Google Scholar
  111. Stodolsky, S. S., & Grossman, P. L. (1995). The impact of subject matter on curricular activity: An analysis of five academic subjects. American Educational Research Journal. 32(2), 227–249.Google Scholar
  112. Talbett, J. E., McLaughlin, M. W., & Rowan. B. (1993). Understanding context effects on secondary school teaching. Teachers College Record, 95(1). 45–68.Google Scholar
  113. Tamir, P. (1988). Subject matter and related pedagogical knowledge in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(2), 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Thompson, A. G. (1984). The relationship of teachers’ conceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching to instructional practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 15(2), 105–127.Google Scholar
  115. Veenman, S. (1984). The perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54(2), 143–178.Google Scholar
  116. Wallace, J., & Louden, W. (1992). Science teaching and teachers’ knowledge: Prospects for reform of elementary classrooms. Science Education, 76(5), 507–521.Google Scholar
  117. West, L. H. T., Fensham, P. J., & Garrard, J. E. (1985). Describing cognitive structures of learners following instruction in chemistry. In L.H.T. West & A.L Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change (pp. 29–49). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  118. Wildy, H., & Wallace, J. (1995). Understanding teaching or teaching for understanding: Alternative frameworks for science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(2), 143–156.Google Scholar
  119. Wilson, S. M., & McDiarmid, G. W. (1996) Something old, something new: What do socials studies teachers need to know? In Murray, F. B. (Ed.). The Teacher Educator’s Handbook. (pp. 295–319). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  120. Wilson, S. M., Shulman, L., & Richert, A. E. (1987). 150 different ways of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring Teacher Thinking (pp. 104–124). Sussex, England: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
  121. Wilson, S. M., & Wineburg, S. S. (1988). Peering at history through different lenses: The role of disciplinary perspectivesin teaching history. Teachers College Record, 89,525–539.Google Scholar
  122. Wineburg, S. S., & Wilson, S. M. (1991). Subject-matter knowledge in the teaching of history. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 305–347). Greenwich CT: JAI.Google Scholar
  123. Zahorik, J. A (1970). The effect of planning on teaching. Elementary School Journal, 3, 143–151.Google Scholar
  124. Zancanella, D. (1991). Teachers reading/reading teaching: Five teacher’s personal approaches to literature and their teaching of literature. Research in the Teaching of English, 25(1), 5–32.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julie Cess-Newsome

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations