Density-Functional Full-Potential Multiple-Scattering Calculations for Free and Embedded Clusters
Conclusions
The aim of the present work was to show that full-potential multiple-scattering theory can be used to solve the density-functional one-particle equations for free and eigenvectors are needed as in basis-set methods based on the Rayleigh-Ritz variational principle. Compared to systems like bulk solids, impurities in the bulk or at the surface, where states with energies near the chemical potential are continuous, in free clusters the states are discrete and partially filled and require special techniques like the use of finite temperatures and integration contours in the complex-energy plane.
The calculated results show that free clusters of 13 atoms are too small to describe the electronic properties of impurities in solids, even energy-integrated quantities like local magnetic moments may turn out completely different. The situation is much more favorable for free cluster of 79 atoms, a fact obvious even from the preliminary calculations done so far. A more complete comparison between free and embedded clusters is planned for the future and requires further investigations. In particular, the temperature dependence and the possibility of several stable configurations and their energy differences should be studied.
Keywords
Hyperfine Field Local Magnetic Moment Fermi Contact Free Cluster Embed ClusterPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.P.J. Braspenning, R. Zeller, A. Lodder, and P.H. Dederichs, Phys. Rev. B 29, 703 (1984).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 2.R. Zeller, J. Phys. C 20, 2347 (1987).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 3.K.H. Johnson, D.D. Vvedensky, and R.P. Messmer, Phys. Rev. B 19, 1519 (1979).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 4.R. Zeller, R. Podloucky, and P.H. Dederichs, Z. Physik B 38, 165 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.P. Blaha and J. Callaway, Phys. Rev. B 33, 1706 (1986).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 6.D.D. Vvedensky, M.E. Eberhart. and M.E. McHenry, Phys. Rev. B 35, 2061 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.P.C. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964).CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
- 8.D.M. Ceperley and B.J. Alder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 566 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.S.H. Vosko, L. Wilk, and M. Nusair, Can J. Phys. 58, 1200 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Lord Rayleigh, Philos. Mag. 34, 481 (1892).MATHGoogle Scholar
- 11.J. Korringa. Physica 13, 392 (1947).CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
- 12.W. Kohn and N. Rostoker, Phys. Rev. 94, 1111 (1954).CrossRefADSMATHGoogle Scholar
- 13.W.H. Butler, A. Gonis, and X.-G. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 45, 11527 (1992).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 14.W.H. Butler, A. Gonis, and X.-G. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 48, 2118 (1993).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 15.P. Lang, V.S. Stepanyuk, K. Wildberger, R. Zeller, and P.H. Dederichs, Sol. State Commun. 92, 755 (1994).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 16.R. Zeller, Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1, 553 (1993).CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
- 17.B. Drittler, Diss. TH Aachen, Berichte des Forschungszentrums Jülich, Jül-2445 (1991).Google Scholar
- 18.N. Stefanou, H. Akai, and R. Zeller, Comput. Phys. Commun. 60, 231 (1990).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.R. Zeller, J. Deutz, and P.H. Dederichs, Sol. State Commun. 44, 993 (1982).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 20.R.P. Sagar, Comput. Phys. Commun. 66, 271 (1991).MathSciNetMATHADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.J.E. Muller and J.W. Wilkins, Phys. Rev. B 29, 4331 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.R. Zeller, in Metallic Alloys: Experimental and Theoretical Perspectives — 1993 Dearfield Beach, Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop, edited by J.S. Faulkner and R.G. Jordan, NATO AS1 Series E: Vol. 256 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1994).Google Scholar
- 23.K. Lee and J. Callaway, Phys. Rev. B 49, 13906 (1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar