Conclusions

R. J. Schalkoff, Digital image processing and computer vision. Singapore: John Wiley and Sons, 1989.Google Scholar

Y. Ohta, Knowledge Based Interpretation of Outdoor Natural Color Scenes. Boston: Pitman, 1985.Google Scholar

V. P. Kumar and U. B. Desai, “Image interpretation using a Bayesian network,” Tech. Rep. SPANN.96.3, SPANN Lab, Dept. of Elect. Engrg., Indian Institute of Technology-Bombay, May 1996.Google Scholar

A. Grasselli, Automatic interpretation and classification of images. New York Academic Press, 1969.Google Scholar

H. Andrews, Automatic Interpretation and Classification of Images by Use of the Fourier Domain. New York Academic Press, 1969.Google Scholar

R. Narasimham, On the Description, Generation, and Recognition of Classes of Pictures. New York Academic Press, 1969.Google Scholar

I. Hofmann, H. Niemann, and G. Sagerer, “Model based interpretation of image sequences from the heart,” in Proceedings of an international workshop held in Amsterdam, Holland, 1985.Google Scholar

C. Sagerer, “Automatic interpretation of medical image sequences,” Pattern Recognition Letters, pp. 87–102, 1988.Google Scholar

N. Karssemeijer, Interpretation of medical images by model guided analysis. PhD thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 1989.Google Scholar

R. Baldock, “Trainable models for the interpretation of biomedical images,” Image and Vision Computing, pp. 444–450, 1992.Google Scholar

T. Cootes, A. Hill, C. Taylor, and J. Haslam, “Use of active shape models for locating structure in medical images,” Image and Vision Computing, pp. 355–365, 1994.Google Scholar

J. Desachy, “A knowledge-based system for satellite image interpretation,” in Proceedings 11th IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition, pp. 198–200, 1992.Google Scholar

M. Nagao and T. Matsuyama, A Structural Analysis of Complex Aerial Photographs. New York Plenum, 1980.Google Scholar

J. McKendrick and M. Lybanon, “Knowledge-based interpretation aids to the navy oceanographic image analyst,” in Proceedings: Image Understanding Workshop, pp. 61–63, 1985.Google Scholar

D. M. Jr. and W. Harvey, “Automating knowledge acquisition for aerial image interpretation:” in Image Understanding Workshop, 1987.Google Scholar

T. Silberberg, “Multiresolution aerial image interpretation,” in Proceedings Image Understanding Workshop, pp. 505–511, 1988.Google Scholar

D. Kuan, H. Shariat, K. Dutta, and P. Ransil, “A constraint-based system for interpretation of aerial imagery,” in Second International Conference on Computer Vision, 1988.Google Scholar

D. M. Jr., W. Harvey, and L. Wixson, “Automating knowledge acquisition for aerial image interpretation:” CVGIP: Image Understanding, pp. 37–81, 1989.Google Scholar

P. Garnesson, G. Giraudon, and P. Montesinos. “An image analysis system, application for aerial imagery interpretation,” in Tenth International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 1990.Google Scholar

V. Venkateswar and R. Chellappa, “A framework for interpretation of aerial images,” in Tenth International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 1990.Google Scholar

K. Schutte, Knowledge Based Recognition of Man-Made Objects. PhD thesis, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217 7500 AE Enschede The Netherlands, February 1994.Google Scholar

B. Draper, R. Collins, J. Brolio, J. Griffith, A. Hanson, and E. Riseman, “Tools and experiments in the knowledge-directed interpretation of road scenes,” in Image Understanding Workshop, 1987.Google Scholar

Y. Ozaki, K. Sato, and S. Inokuchi, “Rule-driven processing and recognition from range image,” in Intel: Conf. on Pattern Recog., pp. 804–807, 1988.Google Scholar

D. Chelberg, “Uncertainty in interpretation of range imagery,” in Third International Conference on Computer Vision, 1990.Google Scholar

J. Aggarwal and N. Nandhakumar, Multisensor Fusion for Automatic Scene Interpretation. Ramesh C. Jain and Anil K. Jain, Analysis and Interpretation of Range Images: Springer-Verlag, 1990.Google Scholar

R. C. Jain and A. K. Jain, Analysis and Interpretation of Range Images. Springer-Verlag, 1990.Google Scholar

T. Strat and M. Fischler, “A context-based recognition system for natural scenes and complex domains,” in Image Understanding Workshop, pp. 456–472, 1990.Google Scholar

M. Hild and Y. Shirai, “Interpretation of natural scenes using multi-parameter default models and qualitative constraints,” in International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 497–501, 1993.Google Scholar

T. Silberberg, “Infrared image interpretation using spatial and temporal knowledge,” in Workshop on Computer Vision, pp. 264–267, 1987.Google Scholar

N. Nandhakumar and J. Aggarwal, “Integrated analysis of thermal and visua images for scene interpretation,” IEEE Trans. on Patt. Anal. and Mach. Intell., pp. 469–431, 1988.Google Scholar

A. Taylor, A. Gross, D. Hogg, and D. Mason, “Knowledge-based interpretation of remotely sensed images,” IVC, pp. 67–83, 1986.Google Scholar

V. Clement, G. Giraudon, and S. Houzelle, “Interpretation of remotely sensed images in a context of multisensor fusion,” in Second European Conference on Compute Vision, 1992.Google Scholar

Z. Zhang and M. Simaan, “A rule-based interpretation system for segmentation of seismic images,” Pattern Recognition, pp. 45–53, 1987.Google Scholar

A. Heller, D. LaRocque, and J. Mundy, “The interpretation of synthetic aperture radar images using projective invariants and deformable templates,” in DARPA Image Understanding Workshop, pp. 831–837, 1992.Google Scholar

C.-C. Chu and J. Aggarwal, “The interpretation of laser radar images by a knowledge-based system,” Machine Vision and Applications, pp. 145–163, 1991.Google Scholar

M. Kurtz, P. Mussio, and P. Ossorio, “A cognitive system for astronomical image interpretation,” Pattern Recognition Letters, pp. 507–515, 1990.Google Scholar

S. Towers and R. Baldock, “Application of a knowledge-based system to the interpretation of ultrasound images,” in Ninth International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 1988.Google Scholar

V. Roberto, A. Peron, and P. Fumis, “Low-level processing techniques in geophysical image interpretation,” Pattern Recognition Letters, pp. 111–122, 1989.Google Scholar

K. Sugimoto, M. Takahashi, and F Tomita, “Scene interpretation based on boundary representations of stereo images,” in Ninth International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 1988.Google Scholar

T. Pridmore, J. Mayhew, and J. Frisby, “Exploiting image-plane data in the interpretation of edge-based binocular disparity,” Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, pp. 1–25, 1990.Google Scholar

Y. L. Guilloux, “Automatic computation of motion in an image sequence, interest for interpretation,” Signal Processing, pp. 377-, 1985.Google Scholar

A. Milano, F Perotti, S. Serpico, and G. Vemazza, “A system for the interpretation of 3-d moving scenes from 2-d image sequences,” International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intell., pp. 765–796, 1991.Google Scholar

S. Tsuji, “Continuous image interpretation by a moving viewer,” in Ninth International Conference on Pattern Recognition, pp. 514–519, 1988.Google Scholar

T. Binford, “Survey of model based image analysis systems,” Int. J. Roborics Res., pp. 587–633, 1982.Google Scholar

C. Smyrmiotis and K. Dutta, “A knowledge-based system for recognizing man-made objects in aerial images,” in Proc. Comp. Vis. and Patt. Recog., pp. 111–117, 1988.Google Scholar

D. Ballard, C. Brown, and J. Feldman, “An approach to knowledge-directed scene analysis:’ in CVS, pp. 271–281, 19xx.Google Scholar

A. Mitiche, A. Mansouri, and C. Meubus, “A knowledge based image interpretation system,” in Ninth International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 1988.Google Scholar

C.-C. Chu and J. Aggarwal, “Image interpretation using multiple sensing modalities,” IEEE Trans. on Patt. Anal. and Mach. Intell., pp. 840–847, 1992.Google Scholar

V. Roberto, “Knowledge-based understanding of signals: An introduction,” Signal Processing, pp. 29–56, 1993.Google Scholar

P. Puliti and G. Tascini, “Knowledge-based approach to image interpretation,” Image and Vision Computing, pp. 122–128, 1993.Google Scholar

J. Smolle, R. Hofmann-Wellenhof, and H. Kerl, “Pattern interpretation by cellular automata (pica)-evaluation of tumour cell adhesion in human melanomas,” Analytical Cellular Pathology, pp. 91–106, 1994.Google Scholar

R. Evangelista and 0. Salvetti, “A morphometric and densitometric approach to image interpretation,” Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis, pp. 305–310, 1993.Google Scholar

W. Dickson, “Feature grouping in a hierarchical probabilistic network,” Image and Vision Computing, pp. 51–57, 1991.Google Scholar

F. V. Jensen, H. I. Christensen, and J. Nielsen, “Bayesian methods for interpretation and control in multi-agent vision systems,” Applications of Artificial Intelligence X: Machine Vision and Robotics, SPIE Proceedings Series, vol. 1708, 1992.Google Scholar

W. B. Mann and T. O. Binford, “An example of 3-D interpretation of images using Bayesian networks,” in Proceedings DARPA Image Understanding Workshop,, 1992.Google Scholar

V. P. Kumar and U. B. Desai, “Image interpretation using Bayesian networks,” IEEE Trans. on Pattern Anal. and Machine Intell., pp. 74–77, 1996.Google Scholar

W. Wilhelmi, “Image interpretation by algebraic topology,” Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis, pp. 126–134, 1992.Google Scholar

J. A. Modestino and J. Zhang, “A Markov random field model based approach to image interpretation,” IEEE Trans. on Patt. Anal. and Mach. Intell., pp. 606–615, 1992.Google Scholar

I. Y. Kim and H. S. Yang, “Efficient image labeling based on Markov random field and error backpropagation network,” Pattern Recog., pp. 1695–1707, 1993.Google Scholar

J. M. Tenenbaum and H. G. Barrow, “Experiments in interpretation guided segmentation,” Artificial Intelligence, pp. 241–274, 1977.Google Scholar

R. Bajcsy, F Solina, and A. Gupta, Segmentation versus Object Representation-Are They Separable? Springer-Verlag, 1990.Google Scholar

M. Sonka, S. K. Tadikonda, and S. M. Collins, “Genetic algorithms in hypothesize-and-verify image interpretation,” Proc. SPIE-Sensor Fusion VI, pp. 236–247,1993.Google Scholar

R. A. Schowengerdt, Techniques for Image Processing and Classification in Remote Sensing. New York: Academic Press, 1983.Google Scholar

B. Draper, J. Brolio, R. Collins, A. Hanson, and E. Riseman, “Image interpretation by distributed cooperative processes,” in Proc. Comp. Vis. and Patt. Recog., 1988.Google Scholar

K. S. Kumar and U. B. Desai, “Joint segmentation and image interpretation,” Tech. Rep. SPANN.96.2, SPANN Lab, Dept. of Elect. Engrg., Indian Institute of Technology-Bombay, May 1996.Google Scholar

J. Pearl, “Fusion, propagation and structuring in belief networks,” Artificial Intelligence, pp. 241–288, 1986.Google Scholar

J. Pearl, “Evidential reasoning using stochastic simulation of causal models:’ Artificial Intelligence, pp. 245–257, 1987.Google Scholar

J. Pearl, Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. New York: Morgan Kaufmann, 1988.Google Scholar

R. E. Neapolitan, Probabilistic Reasoning in Expert Systems. New York: John Wiley, 1988.Google Scholar

G. Shafer, A Mathemetical Theory of Evidence. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

E. J. Horovitz, D. E. Heckerman, and C. P. Langlotz, “A framework for comparing alternative formalism for plausible reasoning,” in Proc. of the Fifth National. on AI, (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania), 1986.Google Scholar

I. Y. Kim and H. S. Yang, “An integrated approach for scene understanding based on Markov random field,” Pattern Recog., pp. 1887–1897, 1995.Google Scholar

I. Y. Kim and H. S. Yang, “An integration scheme for image segmentation and labeling based on Markov random fields,” IEEE Trans. on Patt. Anal. and Mach. Intell., pp. 69–73, 1996.Google Scholar

K. S. Kumar and U. B. Desai, “Joint segmentation and image interpretation,” Pattern Recognition, pp. 557–589, April 1999.Google Scholar

D. Marr, Vision. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Co., 1982.Google Scholar

B. K. P. Horn, Robot Vision. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1986.Google Scholar

D. Mumford and J. Shah, “Optimal approximations by piecewise smooth functions and variational problems,” Communication of Pure and Applied Variational Problems, vol. XLII,no. 5, pp. 577–685, 1988.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

J. Besag, “Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems,” J. Royal Statistical Society, pp. 192–236, 1974.Google Scholar

S. Geman and D. Geman, “Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distribution, and Bayesian restoration of images,” IEEE Trans. on Patt. Anal. and Mach. Intell., pp. 721–741, 1984.Google Scholar

S. Kirkpatrick, C. S. Gelatt, and M. P. Vecchi, “Optimization by simulated annealing,” Science, pp. 671–680, 1983.Google Scholar

B. Hajek, “Cooling schedules for optimal annealing,” Mathematics of Operations Research, vol. 134, pp. 311–329, 1989.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

E. Aarts and J. Korst, Simulated annealing and Boltzmann machines. John Wiley, 1989.Google Scholar

G. E. Hinton and T. J. Sejnowski, “Learning and relearning in Boltzmann machines,” in Parallel and Distributed Processing (D. E. Rumelhart, L. McClelland, and the PDP Research Group, eds.), MIT Press, 1988.Google Scholar

C. Koch, J. Marroquin, and A. Yuille, “Analog neuronal networks in early vision,” Proc. National Academic Sciences, pp. 4263–4267, 1986.Google Scholar

A. L. Yuille, “Energy functions for early vision and analog networks,” Biological Cybernetics, vol. 61, pp. 115–123, 1989.Google Scholar

J. Zerubia and R. Chellappa, “Mean Field Annealing for edge detection and image restoration,” in European Conference on Computer Vision, 1990.Google Scholar

D. Geiger and E Girosi, “Parallel and deterministic algorithms from MRF’s: Surface reconstruction,” IEEE Tran. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 13, pp. 401–412, 1991.Google Scholar

M. R. Bhatt and U. B. Desai, “Robust image restoration algorithm using Markov random field model,” Graphical Models and Image Proc., vol. 56, pp. 61–74, January 1994.Google Scholar

E. king, «Beitag sur theorie des ferromagnetismus,» Zeit. fur Physik, vol. 31, pp. 253–258, 1925.Google Scholar

J. Marroquin, S. Mitter, and T. Poggio, “Probabilistic solution of ill-posed problems in computational vision,” ASAJ, vol. 82, pp. 76–89, March 1987.Google Scholar

S. Geman and C. Graffigne, “Markov random fields image models and their applications to computer vision,” in Proc. Int. Congr. Math., 1987.Google Scholar

F. J. Solis and J. B. Wets, “Minimization by random search techniques,” Math. of Operation Research, vol. 6, pp. 19–30, 1991.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

N. Metropolis, A. Rosenbluth, M. Rosenbluth, and E. Teller, “Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines,” J. of Chem. Physics. vol. 21, pp. 1087–1092, 1953.Google Scholar

S. Mallat, “A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation:’ IEEE Trans. on Pattern Anal. and Machine Intell., pp. 674–693, 1989.Google Scholar

P. J. Burt and E. H. Adelson, “The Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code,” IEEE Tran on Comm., pp. 532–540, 1983.Google Scholar

I. Daubechies, Ten Lectures on Wavelets. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: SIAM, 1992.Google Scholar

D. Gabor, “Theory of communication,” Journal of I.E.E., vol. 93, pp. 429–441, 1946.Google Scholar

Y. Meyer, Wavelets. Berlin,: Springer Verlag, 1989.Google Scholar

P. P. Vaidyanathan, Multirate systems and filter banks. Englewoods Cliff, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1993.Google Scholar

J. M. Jolion and A. Rosenfeld, A pyramid framework for early vision. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.Google Scholar

S. K. Kopparapu, U. B. Desai, and P. I. Corke, “Behaviour of image degradation model in multiresolution,” Signal Processing, vol. 80, pp. 2407–2420, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D. Marr and T. Poggio, “A computational theory of human stereo vision,” in Procedings Royal Society London, 1979.Google Scholar

B. Kosko, Neural Networks and Fuzzy Systems. India: Prentice Hall, 1992.Google Scholar

L. Davis, Genetic Algorithms and Simulated Annealing. London: Pitman Publishing, 1987.Google Scholar

R. Prasannappa, L. Davis, and V. S. S. Hwang, “A knowledge-based vision system for aerial image understanding,” CS-TR, p. 1785, 1987.Google Scholar

D. M. McKeown, W. A. Harvey, and J. McDermott, “Rule-based interpretation of aerial imagery,” IEEE Tran. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 7, pp. 570–585, 1985.Google Scholar

J. Pearl, “Fusion, propagation and structuring in belief networks,” Artificial Intelligence, vol.. 29, pp. 241–288, 1986.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

R. E. Neapolitan, Probabilistic Reasoning in Expert Systems. John Wiley, 1990.Google Scholar

S. L. Lauritzen and D. J. Spiegelhalter, “Local computation with probabilities in graphical structures and their applications to expert systems,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society series B, vol. 50, 1988.Google Scholar

J. Pearl, “Evidential reasoning using stochastic simulation of causal models,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 32, pp. 245–257, 1987.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

G. F, Cooper, “The computational complexity of probabilistic inference using Bayesian belief networks,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 42, pp. 393–405, 1990.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

R. M. Chavez and G. F Cooper, “A randomized approximation algorithm for probabilistic inference on the Bayesian belief networks,” Networks, vol. 20, pp. 661–685, 1990.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

P. Dagum and M. Luby, “Approximating probabilistic inference in Bayesian belief networks is NP-hard,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 60, pp. 141–153, 1993.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

K. S. Kumar, Modular Integration for Low-level and High-level Vision Problems in a Multiresolution Framework. PhD thesis, Indian Institute of Technology-Bombay, 1997.Google Scholar

K. S. Kumar and U. B. Desai, “Joint segmentation and image interpretation,” Tech. Rep. SPANN.96.2, Indian Institute of Technology-Bombay, May 1996.Google Scholar

S. Peleg, 0. Federbusch, and R. Hummel, “Custom made pyramids,” in Parallel Computer vision (L. Uhr, ed.), pp. 125–146, Academic Press, 1987.Google Scholar

N. Kamath, K. S. Kumar, U. B. Desai, and R. Duggad, “Joint segmentation and image interpretation using HMM,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition, (Brisbane, Austalia), August 1998.Google Scholar

Y. Linde, A. Buzo, and R. M. Gray, “An algorithm for vector quantization design,” IEEE Trans. Communictions, vol. 28, pp. 84–95, 1980.Google Scholar

J. C. Russ, The image processing handbook. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 1994.Google Scholar

E. R. Davies, Machine vision: theory, algorithms, practicalities. London: Academic Press, 1990.Google Scholar