Fluoropolymers 2 pp 173-190

Part of the Topics in Applied Chemistry book series (TAPP)

Molecular Modeling of Fluoropolymers: Polytetrafluoroethylene

  • David B. Holt
  • Barry L. Farmer
  • Ronald K. Eby

Conclusions

A force field for solid state modeling of fluoropolymers predicted a suitable helical conformation but required further improvement in describing intermolecular effects. Though victory cannot yet be declared, the derived force fields improve substantially on those previously available. Preliminary molecular dynamics simulations with the interim force field indicate that modeling of PTFE chain behavior can now be done in an “all-inclusive” manner instead of the piecemeal focus on isolated motions and defects required previously. Further refinement of the force field with a backbone dihedral term capable of reproducing the complex torsional profile of perfluorocarbons has provided a parameterization that promises both qualitative and quantitative modeling of fluoropolymer behavior in the near future.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    T. W Bates and W. H. Stockmayer, J. Chem. Phys. 45, 2321–2322 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. W. Bates and W. H. Stockmayer, Trans. Faraday Soc. 63, 1825–1834 (1967).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Napolitano, R. Pucciariello, and V. Villani, Makromol. Chem. 191, 2755–2765 (1990).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. Dilario and E. Giglio, Acta Cryst. B30, 372–378 (1974).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    O. Heinonen and P. L. Taylor, Polymer 30, 585–589 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Banerjea and P. L. Taylor, Phys. Rev. B30, 6489–6497 (1984).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Banerjea and P. Taylor, J. Appl. Phys. 53, 6532–6535 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Corradini and G. Guerra, Macromolecules 6, 1410–1413 (1977).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. D. Smith, R. L. Jaffe, and D. Y. Yoon, Macromolecules 27, 3166–3173 (1994).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. Villani, R. Pucciariello, and R. Fusci, Coll. Polymer Sci. 269, 477–482 (1991).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. DeSantis, E. Giglio, A. M. Liquori, and A. Ripamonti, J. Polym. Sci. A-1, 1383–1404 (1963).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Iwasaki, J. Polym. Sci. A-1, 1099–1104 (1963).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P E. MacMahon and R. L. McCullough, Trans. Faraday Soc. 61, 197–200 (1965).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. K. Eby and B. L. Farmer, Polym. Preprints 24(2), 421–422 (1983).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    B. L. Farmer and R. K. Eby, Polymer 22, 1487–1495 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. J. Weeks, B. L. Farmer, E. S. Clark, and R. K. Eby, Proc. 2nd Intern. Symp. Macromolecules, Florence, Italy, (1980), pp. 277–278.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    B. L. Farmer and R. K. Eby, Polymer 26, 1944–1952 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. K. Eby, E. S. Clark, B. L. Farmer, G. J. Piermarini, and S. Block, Polymer 31, 2227–2237 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. J. Weeks, I. C. Sanchez, R. K. Eby, and C. I. Poser, Polymer 21, 325–331 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    T. Yamamoto and T. Hara, Polymer 27, 986–992 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    K. S. Macturk, B. L. Farmer, and R. K. Eby, Polym. Intern. 37, 157–164 (1995).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    D. B. Holt, B; L. Farmer, K. S. MacTurk, and R. K. Eby, Polymer 37, 1847–1855 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 25.
    E J. Boerio, and J. L. Koenig, J. Chem. Phys. 52(9), 4826–4829 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 26.
    J. J. Weeks, E. S. Clark, and R. K. Eby, Polymer 22, 1480–1486 (1981).Google Scholar
  25. 27.
    B. Rosi-Schwartz and G. R. Mitchell, Polymer 35, 3139–3148 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 28.
    E. S. Clark, J. Macromol. Sci. B1, 795–800 (1967).Google Scholar
  27. 29.
    E. S. Clark, and L. T. Muus, Kristallographie 117, 119–127 (1962).Google Scholar
  28. 30.
    N. G. McCrum, B. E. Read, and G. Williams, Anelastic and Dielectric Effects in Polymeric Solids, John Wiley and Sons, London (1967), pp. 460–464.Google Scholar
  29. 31.
    A. J. Vega, and A. D. English, Macromolecules 13, 1635–1647 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 32.
    M. Kimmig, G. Strobl, and B. Stühn, Macromolecules 27, 2481–2495 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 33.
    M. Kimmig, R. Steiner, G. Strobl, and B. Stühn, J. Chem. Phys. 99(10), 8105–8114 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 34.
    B. Rosi-Schwartz, and G. R. Mitchell, Polymer 37, 1857–1870 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 35.
    N. Karasawa and W. A. Goddard III, Macromolecules 25, 7268–7281 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • David B. Holt
    • 1
  • Barry L. Farmer
    • 1
  • Ronald K. Eby
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesville
  2. 2.Institute of Polymer ScienceUniversity of AkronAkron

Personalised recommendations