Advertisement

Wireless Phone Use and the Risk of Primary Brain Cancer

  • J. E. Muscat

Keywords

Cell Phone Brain Cancer Specific Absorption Rate Cellular Telephone Landline Telephone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kuster N & Balzano Q. Energy absorption mechanisms by biological bodies in the near field of dipole antennas above 300 MHz. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 1992; 41: 174–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Guy AW. The starting point: Wireless Technology Research, LLC’s dosimetry risk evaluation research. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 1997, 3: 25–50.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Preston-Martin S, Pogoda JM, Schlehofer B, Blettner M, Howe GR, Ryan P, et al. An international case-control study of adult glioma and meningioma: The role of head trauma. Inter J Epidemiol 1998; 27: 579–586.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ries LAG, Kosary CL, Hankey BF, Miller BA, Harras A, Edwards BK (editors). SEER cancer statistics review 1973&2013;1994. NIH Pub. No. 97-2789. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 1997.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davidson JA. Brain tumors and mobile phones? Med J Aust 1998; 168: 48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rothman KJ, Loughlln E, Funch DP, & Dreyer NA. Overall mortality of cellular telephone customers. Epidemiology 1996; 7: 303–305.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Redelmeier DA & Tibshrani RJ. Association between cellular telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. New Eng J Med 1997; 336: 453–458.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Violanti JM. Cellular phones and fatal traffic collisions. Accid Anal Prev 1998; 30: 5 19–524.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Funch DP, Rothman KJ, Loughlin JE, & Dreyer NA. Utility of telephone company records for epidemiologic studies of cellular telephones. Epidemiology 1996; 7: 299–302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wynder EL, Higgins IT, & Harris RE. The wish bias. J Clin Epidemiol 1990; 43: 619–621.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 1 1.
    Kheifets LL Afifi AA, Buffler PA, & Zhang ZW. Occupational electric and magnetic field exposure and brain cancer: A meta-analysis. J Occup Environ Med 1995; 37 1327–134 1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Valberg PA. Electric and magnetic fields (EMF): What do we know about the health effects? Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1996; 68: 448–454.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS). Assessment of health effects from exposure to power-line frequency electric and magnetic fields. Working group report. NIH Pub. No. 98-3981. Research Triangle Park, NC: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, US National Institutes of Health; 1998.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Joshi W, Cantor AB, Altschuler G, Cohen LJ, Larkin EW, Shuster JJ, et al. Conventional versus modified morphologic criteria for ganglioneuroblastoma: A review of cases from the Pediatric Oncology Group. Arch Path Lab Med 1996; 120: 859–865.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Elwood JM. A critical review of epidemiologic studies of radiofrequency exposure and human cancers. Environ Health Perspect 1999; 107(Suppl 1): 155–168.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brusick D, Albertini R, McRee D, Williams G, Hanawalt P, & Preston J. Genotoxicity of radiofrequency radiation. Environ Mol Mutagen 1998; 32: 1–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Adey WR, Byus CV, Cain CD, Higgins RJ, Jones RA, Kean CJ, et al. Spontaneous and nitrosourea-induced primary tumors of the central nervous system in Fischer 344 rats chronically exposed to 836 MHz modulated microwaves. Radiat Res 1999 (in press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. E. Muscat

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations