This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Albert, M. S., Naeser, M. A., Duffy, F. H., & McAnulty, G. (1987). CT and EEG validators for Alzheimer’s disease. In L. W. Poon (Ed.), Handbook of memory assessment of older adults (pp. 383–392). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Denson, D. F., Davis, H. J., & Snyder, B. D. (1985). Posterior cortical atrophy. Archives of Neurology, 45, 789–793.
Cattell, J. M. (1886). The time it takes to see and name objects. Mind, 11, 63–65.
Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland: J. L. (1990). On the control or automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332–361
Delis, D. C., Kramer, J. H., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B. A. (1987). The California verbal learning test-research edition. New York: Psychological Corporation.
Dunbar, K. & MacLeod, C. M. (1983). A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance, 10, 622–639.
Dyer, F. N. & Severance, L. G. (1972). Effects of irrelevant colors on reading of color names: A controlled replication of the “reverse Stroop” effect. Psychonomic Science, 28, 336–338.
Glaser, M. O. & Glaser. W. R. (1982). Time course analysis or the Stroop phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance, 8, 875–594.
Goodglass. H. & Kaplan, E. (1983). The assessment of aphasia and related disorders (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger.
Goodglass, H., Wingfield, A., Schonewill, W., & Howerton, B. (1995). Alexia and a reverse Stroop effect in a case of posterior cerebral atrophy without focal lesion. Brain and Language, 51, 173–176.
Gumenik, W. E. & Glass, R. (1970). Effects orreducing the readability ofthe words in the Stroop Color-Word Test. Psychonomic Science, 20, 247–248.
Hooper, H. E. (1982). The Hooper visual organization test. Concordville, PA: Brandywine Associates.
Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (1983). Boston naming test. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger.
LaBerge, D. & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6,293–323.
Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527.
Logan, G. D. (1997). Automaticity and reading: Perspectives from the instance theory of automatization Reading and Writing Quarterly, 13, 123–146.
MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203.
Naeser, M. 4., Palumbo, C. L., Prete, M. N., Fitzpatrick, P. N., Miniura, M., Samaraweera, R., & Albert, M. L. (1998). Visible changes in lesion borders on CT scan after five years poststroke, and long-term recovery in aphasia. Brain and Language, 62, 1–28.
Naslund, J. C. & Smolkin, S. B. (1997). Automaticity and phonemic representations: Perceptual and cognitive building blocks for reading. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 13, 147–154.
Posner, M. I. & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Raichle, M. E., Fiez, J. A., Videen, T. O., MacLeod, A. K., Pardo, J. V., Fox, P. T., & Petersen, S. E. (1994). Practice-related changes in human brain functional anatomy during nonmotor learning. Cerebral Cortex, 4, 8–26.
Samuels, S. J. & Flor, R. F. (1997). The importance of automaticity for developing expertise in reading. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 13, 107–121.
Segalowitz, N. S. & Segalowitz, S. J. (1993). Skilled performance, practice, and the differentiation of speed-up from automatization effects: Evidence from second language word recognition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 369–385.
Shiffrin, R. M. & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.
Stroop. J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 499–504.
Thurlow, R. & VandenBrock, P. (1997). Automaticity and inference generation during reading comprehension. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 13, 165–181.
Tzelgov, J., Yehene, V., & Naveh-Benjamin, M. (1997). From automaticity to memory and vice versa: On the relations between automaticity and memory. In J. Brezinski, B. Krause, & T. Maryszewski (Eds.), ldealization in psychology: Poznam studies of the sciences and humanities (pp. 239–261). Amsterdam-Atlanta: Rodopi.
Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler adult intelligence scale (Rev. ed.). New York: The Psychological Corporation.
Wechsler, D. (1988). Wechsler memory scale (Rev. ed.). New York: Psychological Corporation.
Victoroff, J., Ross, G. W., Benson, F.. Verity, M. A., & Vinters, H. V. (1994). Posterior cortical atrophy. Archives of Neurology, 51, 269–274.
Wingfield, A., Goodglass, I-I., & Lindfield, K. C. (1997). Separating speed from automaticity in a patient with focal brain atrophy. Psychological Science, 8, 247–249.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lindfield, K.C., Goodglass, H., Wingfield, A. (2002). Dissociating Speed from Automaticity in the Stroop Task: Evidence from a Case of Progressive Posterior Cortical Atrophy. In: Connor, L.T., Obler, L.K. (eds) Neurobehavior of Language and Cognition. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-46898-0_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-46898-0_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-7877-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-46898-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive