Abstract
After several years of the proposal and implementation of Bitcoin by Satoshi Nakamoto, people in the world were enthusiastic about crypto-assets. However, the market prices of crypto-assets are too unstable to use as a payment method. After many cyber-attack incidents, the confidence in the security of crypto-asset exchanges has also been compromised. Satoshi proposed Bitcoin to realize anonymous payment to protect individual privacy. Actual crypto-assets have changed from the original concept. The main reason for this deviation was the reality that ordinary investors cannot manage their secret keys securely. In this chapter, the reasons for this deviation are investigated.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Counting users of crypto-assets is a controversial issue. According to the report of Chainalysis (2018), the Bitcoin blockchain consists of 460 million addresses as of December 2018. Still, only 27 million addresses actually hold Bitcoin, and there is no information on how these addresses link to actual Bitcoin holders. In 2017, Japanese regulation required crypto-asset exchanges in Japan to perform a strict KYC to every customer in Japan. Japan Virtual Currency Exchange Association (JVCEA) aggregated reported numbers of customers of all registered exchanges and disclosed that there are 3.5 million actual crypto-asset holders in Japan (JVCEA 2018).
- 2.
The reward is programmed to decline to 6.25 BTC in mid-May 2020. This event is called “Halving.”
References
Back, A. (2002). Hashcash—A denial of service counter-measure. http://www.hashcash.org/papers/hashcash.pdf.
Bayer, D., Haber, S., & Stornetta, W. S. (1993). Improving the efficiency and reliability of digital time-stamping.
Bearman, J. (2015). Silk road: The untold story. https://www.wired.com/2015/05/silk-road-untold-story/.
Chainalaysis. (2018). Mapping the universe of Bitcoin’s 460 million addresses. December 19, 2018. https://blog.chainalysis.com/reports/Bitcoin-addresses.
Chaum, D. (1982). Blind signatures for untraceable payments. In Advances in Cryptology Proceedings of Crypto, vol. 82.
Haber, S., & Stornetta, W. S. (1991). How to time-stamp a digital document. Journal of Cryptology, 3(2), 99–111.
Haber, S., & Stornetta, W. S. (1997). Secure names for bit-strings. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference.
Iwashita, N. (2019a). Threats to crypto-assets and counter-measures. Journal of Digital Practices Information Processing Society of Japan 10(3) (in Japanese).
Iwashita, N. (2019b). Regulation of crypto-asset exchanges and the necessity of international cooperation, T20/TF2 Policy Brief, March 15, 2019. https://t20japan.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/t20-japan-tf2-3-regulation-crypto-asset-exchanges.pdf.
Japan Virtual Currency Exchange Association (JVCEA). (2018). Current status report on virtual currency transaction in Japan. April 10, 2018 (in Japanese). https://www.fsa.go.jp/news/30/singi/20180410-3.pdf.
Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. https://Bitcoin.org/Bitcoin.pdf.
Okamoto, T., & Ohta, K. (1989). Divertible zero-knowledge interactive proofs and commutative random self-reducibility. Advances in Cryptology—EUROCRYPT’89, LNCS, 434, 134–149.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Iwashita, N. (2020). Bitcoin’s Deviations from Satoshi’s World. In: Pichl, L., Eom, C., Scalas, E., Kaizoji, T. (eds) Advanced Studies of Financial Technologies and Cryptocurrency Markets. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4498-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4498-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-4497-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-4498-9
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)