Abstract
Forest ecosystems provide a number of goods and services vital for human life, livelihoods, socio-cultural activities and economies (MEA, 2005; Patterson and Coelho, 2009; Persha et al., 2011). The supplies of these goods and services are contingent upon human actions associated with forests, such as policy and legal frameworks, tenure arrangements, forest management systems, governance structure and rights-based activism, which can collectively be referred to as forestry ‘institutions’ (Robbins, 1998; Springate-Baginski and Blaikie, 2007). Institutions contribute to good governance for forestry. These institutions may be formal or informal, legal or customary. They affect and are affected by people who are dependent on forests for their livelihoods and economies. While institutions are crucial for the protection, management and use of forest resources, the roles and responsibilities of the actors and stakeholders with defined access to, control over and use of forest resources matter for forestry sector governance (FAO, 2011; Larson et al., 2010; RRI, 2009). The categories of actors associated with the access to, control over and use of forest resources include, but are not limited to, males or females, landlords or tenants, industrialized or developing countries, bureaucracy or communities, state or private sector and so on (Larson et al., 2010; RRI, 2009). A cross-cutting category among these actors is the category of ‘women’. However, the roles and responsibilities of women in forestry sector governance or institutions are one of the most contested issues in recent decades (Agarwal, 2010a, 2010b; Sarker and Das, 2002; Shiva, 1989; Sunderland et al., 2014; FAO, 2006; Coutinho-Sledge, 2015).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ABS. (2013). Women in the workforce: By industry. (6291.0.55.003). Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/6291.0.55.003?OpenDocument: Labour Force, Australia, Detailed, Quarterly.
Agarwal, B. (2010a). Does women’s proportional strength affect their participation? Governing local forests in South Asia. World Development, 38(1), 98–112.
Agarwal, B. (2010b). Gender and green governance: The political economy of women’s presence within and beyond community forestry. Oxford University Press.
Awasti, G. D., & Adhikary, R. (2012). Changes in civil service after the adoption of inclusive policy and reform measures. Retrieved from http://un.info.np/Net/NeoDocs/View/2000. Kathmandu.
Bennet, L. (2005, December 12–15). Gender, caste and ethnic exclusion in Nepal: Following the policy process from analysis to action. World Bank.
Bhatta, B. D. (2013). Women in civil service (in Nepali vernacular). Gorkhapatra Daily.
Buchy, M., & Rai, B. (2008). Do women-only approaches to natural resource management help women? The case of community forestry in Nepal. In B. P. Resurreccion & R. Elmhirst (Eds.), Gender and natural resource management: Livelihoods, mobility and interventions (pp. 127–147). Oxford: Earthscan.
Buckingham-Hatfield, S. (2005). Gender and environment. London: Routledge.
Christie, E. M., & Giri, K. (2011). Challenges and experiences of women in the forestry sector in Nepal. International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 3(5), 139–146.
Colfer, C. (2013). The gender box: A framework for analysing gender roles in forest management. CIFOR Occasional Paper (82).
Coutinho-Sledge, P. (2015). Feminized forestry: The promises and pitfalls of change in a masculine organization. Gender, Work & Organization, 22(4), 375–389.
FAO. (2006). Time for action: Changing the gender situation in forestry. Report of the team of specialists on Gender and Forestry, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
FAO. (2007). Gender mainstreaming in forestry in Africa. Forestry Policy and Institution Working Paper.
FAO. (2011). Reforming forest tenure: Issues, principles and process. Rome.
Ferguson, K. (1984). The feminist case against bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Case.
Gilmour, D. A., & Fisher, R. J. (1991). Villagers, forests, and foresters: The philosophy, process, and practice of community forestry in Nepal. Kathmandu: Sahayogi Press.
Giri, K., & Faculty, I. (2008). Reflecting on experiences: Women in the forestry sector (Vol. MemCoE IoF Discussion Paper # 24). Pokhara, Nepal: Institute of Forestry.
GoN. (1988). Master plan for the forestry sector, Nepal (Main Report). Kathmandu.
GoN. (1993). Forest Act. Kathmandu: Government of Nepal, Law Books Management Board.
GoN. (2004). Herbs and non-timber forest products development policy, 2061, Kathmandu, Nepal.
GoN. (2007). The interim constitution of Nepal. Kathmandu: Government of Nepal, Law Book Management Board.
GoN. (2015a). Forest policy. Kathmandu: Government of Nepal.
GoN. (2015b). Status of women foresters under the Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Nepal: PIS database. Kathmandu: MOFSC.
GoN. (2016a). Forest sector strategy. Kathmandu: Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation.
GoN. (2016b). The constitution of Nepal. Kathmandu: Government of Nepal, Law Book Management Board.
GoN. (2017). Fourteenth plan. Kathmandu: National Planning Commission.
Gurung, J., Hytonen, L., & Pathak, B. (2012, September 22–24). Scoping dialogue on inclusion and exclusion of women in forest sector. Co-chair Summary Report.
Gurung, J. D. (2002). Getting at the heart of the issue: Challenging male bias in Nepal’s department of forests. Mountain Research and Development, 22(3), 212–215.
Hobley, M., & Malla, Y. (1996). From forests to forestry—The three ages of forestry in Nepal: Privatization, nationalization, and populism. In M. Hobley (Ed.), Participatory forestry: The process of change in India and Nepal (pp. 65–92). London: Rural Development Forestry Network, Overseas Development Institute.
Kenny, M., & Mackay, F. (2009). Already doin’it for ourselves? Skeptical notes on feminism and institutionalism. Politics & Gender, 5(2), 271–280.
Khadka, M. (2009). Why does exclusion continue? Aid, knowledge and power in Nepal’s community forestry policy process. The Hague, The Netherlands: Erasmus University Rotterdam.
Krook, M. L., & Mackay, F. (2015). Introduction: Gender, politics and institutions. In M. L. Krook & F. Mackay (Eds.), Gender, politics and institutions: Towards a feminist institutionalism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Larson, A. M., Barry, D., & Dahal, G. R. (2010). Tenure change in global south. In A. M. Larson, D. Barry, G. R. Dahal, & C. J. P. Colfer (Eds.), Forests for people: Community rights and forest tenure reform (pp. 3–18). London, Washington, DC: Earthscan.
Lidestav, G. (2010). Preface: Gender and forestry. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 25(S9), 1–5.
Mackay, F., Kenny, M., & Chappell, L. (2010). New institutionalism through a gender lens: Towards a feminist institutionalism? International Political Science Review, 31(5), 573–588.
Mai, Y. H., Mwangi, E., & Wan, M. (2011). Gender analysis in forestry research: Looking back and thinking ahead. International Forestry Review, 13(2), 245–258.
McDougall, C. L., Leeuwis, C., Bhattarai, T., Maharjan, M. R., & Jiggins, J. (2013). Engaging women and the poor: Adaptive collaborative governance of community forests in Nepal. Agriculture and Human Values, 30(4), 569–585.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Our human planet (Vol. 5). Washington, DC: Island Press.
Multistakeholder Forestry Programme. (2014). Assessment of implementation status of forestry sector gender equality and social inclusion strategy. Kathmandu.
Mwangi, E., Meinzen-Dick, R., & Sun, Y. (2011). Gender and sustainable forest management in East Africa and Latin America. Ecology and Society, 16(1), 150.
Patterson, T. M., & Coelho, D. L. (2009). Ecosystem services: Foundations, opportunities, and challenges for the forest products sector. Forest Ecology and Management, 257(8), 1637–1646.
Persha, L., Agrawal, A., & Chhatre, A. (2011). Social and ecological synergy: Local rulemaking, forest livelihoods, and biodiversity conservation. Science, 331(6024), 1606–1608.
Pokhrel, B. K., & Niraula, D. R. (2004, August 4–6). Community forestry governance in Nepal: Achievements, challenges and options for the future. In K. R. Kanel, P. Mathema, B. R. Kandel, D. R. Niraula, A. R. Sharma, & M. Gautam (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourth national workshop on community forestry (pp. 298–316). Kathmandu: Department of Forests, Nepal.
Robbins, P. (1998). Authority and environment: Institutional landscapes in Rajasthan, India. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88(3), 410–435.
RRI. (2009). Who owns the forests of Asia? An introduction to the forest tenure transition in Asia 2002–2008. Washington, DC.
Sarker, D., & Das, N. (2002). Women’s participation in forestry. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(43), 4407–4412.
Sewell, W. H., Jr. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1–29.
Shiva, V. (1989). Staying alive: Women, ecology, and development. London: Zed Books.
Springate-Baginski, O., & Blaikie, P. (2007). Understanding the policy process. In O. Springate-Baginski & P. Blaikie (Eds.), Forests people and power: The political ecology of reform in South Asia (pp. 61–91). London: Routledge.
Subedi, B. P., Ghimire, P. L., Koontz, A., Khanal, S. C., Katwal, P., Sthapit, K. R., & Khadka Mishra, S. (2014). Private sector involvement and investment in Nepal’s forestry: Status, prospects and ways forward. Study Report, Multi Stakeholder Forestry Programme—Services Support Unit, Babar Mahal, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Sunderland, T., Achdiawan, R., Angelsen, A., Babigumira, R., Ickowitz, A., Paumgarten, F., et al. (2014). Challenging perceptions about men, women, and forest product use: A global comparative study. World Development, 64, S55–S66.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wagle, R., Pillay, S., Wright, W. (2020). Introduction. In: Feminist Institutionalism and Gendered Bureaucracies. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2588-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2588-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-2587-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-2588-9
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)