Skip to main content

Self-Study Informed by Pragmatism and Schwab’s Commonplaces

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 366 Accesses

Part of the book series: Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices ((STEP,volume 21))

Abstract

Self-study is an excellent research methodology for outdoor educators because of the tangible outcomes for practice. The theoretical framework for this self-study research rests on pragmatism and Schwab’s commonplaces. Pragmatism provides a way to navigate the divergent pressures on both outdoor education and initial teacher education because, according to pragmatism, truth claims are based on how convincing an argument is. Educational change has been dominated by “bandwagons” and “fads” due to the dominance of one or other particular discourse. In order to create balanced curriculum change, Schwab recommends bringing the perspectives of the four key commonplaces to bear on any educational innovation: learners, teachers, subject area and milieu. I demonstrate how this self-study has been influenced by pragmatism and the commonplaces. Self-study research is defined through LaBoskey’s criteria with a particular focus on trustworthiness and data analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allender, J. S., & Allender, D. S. (2008). The humanistic teacher. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, G., & Herr, K. (1999). The new paradigm wars: Is there room for rigorous practitioner knowledge in schools and universities? Educational Researcher, 28(5), 12–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson-Patton, V., & Bass, E. (2002). Using narrative teaching portfolios for self-study. In N. Lyons & V. LaBoskey (Eds.), Narrative inquiry in practice: Advancing the knowledge of teaching (pp. 101–114). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attard, K. (2014). Self-study as professional development. In A. Ovens & T. Fletcher (Eds.), Self-study in physical education teacher education: Exploring the interplay of practice and scholarship (Vol. 13, pp. 29–43). London: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, A. (2004). Making the private public: Giving preservice teachers access to their teacher educators’ thinking via an electronic journal. Didaktisk Tidskrift: För praktiker och forskare, 14(1), 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. D. (2011). More than glimpses in the mirror: An argument for self-study in the professional learning of physical education teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 2(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/18377122.2011.9730341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullough, R., & Pinnegar, S. (2001). Guidelines for quality in autobiographical forms of self-study research. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/3594469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 507–536). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry-Holmes, C. H. (1999). Reading pragmatism (Vol. 24). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A., & Erickson, G. (2004). Self- study: The fifth commonplace. Australian Journal of Education, 48(2), 199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clift, R. T. (2004). Self-study research in the context of teacher education programs. In J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 1, pp. 1333–1366). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coburn, C. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32, 145–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2004). Practitioner inquiry, knowledge, and university culture. In J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 1, pp. 575–600). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1988). Teachers as curriculum planners: Narratives of experience. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, C. J. (2008). Joseph Schwab, self-study of teaching and teacher education practices proponent? A personal perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), 1993–2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Powerful teacher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 523–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davey, R. (2013). The professional identity of teacher educators. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1900). The school and society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Boston: D.C. Heath & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. Rahway, NJ: The Barnes Foundation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreaver, K. (2009). Teachers as learners: Improving outcomes for Māori and Pasifika students through inquiry. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E. W. (2017). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elijah, R. (2004). Voice in self-study. In J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 1, pp. 247–272). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ermeling, B. A. (2010). Tracing the effects of teacher inquiry on classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenstermacher, G. D. (1994). The place of practical argument in the education of teachers. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Teacher change and the staff development process: A case in reading instruction (pp. 23–42). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2005). The interview: From neutral stance to political involvement. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 695–727). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodson, I. (2011). Life politics: Conversations about education and culture. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, M. L. (2002). Change, social justice, and re-liability: Reflections of a secret (change) agent. In J. Loughran & T. Russell (Eds.), Improving teacher education practices through self-study (pp. 176–189). London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, M. L., & Pinnegar, S. (1998). Conclusion: The value and the promise of self-study. In M. L. Hamilton et al. (Eds.), Reconceptualizing teaching practice: Self-study in teacher education (pp. 31–33). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay, J. K., & Johnson, K. L. (2002). Capturing complexity: A typology of reflective practice for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00051-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., & Grootenboer, P. J. (2008). Situating praxis in practice: Practice architectures and the cultural, social and material conditions for practice. In S. Kemmis & T. Smith (Eds.), Enabling praxis: Challenges for education (pp. 37–62). Amsterdam: Sense.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J. L. (1991). Teachers as researchers: Qualitative inquiry as a path to empowerment. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korthagen, F. (1992). Techniques for stimulating reflection in teacher education seminars. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8(3), 265–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korthagen, F., Loughran, J., & Russell, T. (2006). Developing fundamental principles for teacher education programs and practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(8), 1020–1041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuzmic, J. J. (2002). Research as a way of knowing and seeing: Advocacy for the other. In J. Loughran & T. Russell (Eds.), Improving teacher education practices through self-study (pp. 222–236). London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBoskey, V. K. (2004). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 1, pp. 817–870). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lighthall, F. (2004). Fundamental features and approaches of the s-step enterprise. In J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 1, pp. 193–246). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J. (2004). Learning through self-study: The influence of purpose, participants and context. In J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 1, pp. 151–192). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J. (2007). Researching teacher education practices: Responding to the challenges, demands, and expectations of self-study. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487106296217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J., & Northfield, J. (1998). A framework for the development of self-study practice. In M. L. Hamilton, S. Pinnegar, T. Russell, J. Loughran, & V. K. LaBoskey (Eds.), Reconceptualizing teaching practice: Self-study in teacher education (pp. 7–18). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackinnon, A. M. (1987). Detecting reflection-in-action among pre-service elementary science teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3(2), 135–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manke, M. P. (2004). Administrators also do self-study: Issues of power and community, social justice and teacher education reform. In J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 1, pp. 1367–1392). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Matusov, E., & Brobst, J. (2013). Radical experiment in dialogic pedagogy in higher education and its centauric failure: Chronotopic analysis. New York: Nova.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, E. (2003). Toward collective praxis in teacher education: Complexity, pragmatism and practice. Thesis, University of Canterbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misco, T. (2012). The importance of context for teaching controversial issues in international settings. International Education, 42(1). Retrieved from http://trace.tennessee.edu/internationaleducation/vol42/iss1/5

  • Munby, H., & Russell, T. (1990). Metaphor in the study of teachers’ professional knowledge. Theory Into Practice, 29(2), 116–121. https://doi.org/10.2307/1476909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, C., Clelland, T., & Lindsay, H. (2018). Phases in collaboration: Using Schwab’s deliberation to respond to change in teacher education. Studying Teacher Education, 14(2), 212–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuthall, G. A. (2005). The cultural myths and realities of classroom teaching and learning: A personal journey. Teachers College Record, 107(5), 895–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw, R., & Ball, T. (2008). New Zealand. In T. O’Donoghue & C. Whitehead (Eds.), Teacher education in the English-speaking world: Past, present and future (pp. 155–172). Charlotte, NC: IAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovens, A., & Fletcher, T. (2014). Doing self-study: The art of turning inquiry on yourself. In A. Ovens & T. Fletcher (Eds.), Self-study in physical education teacher education: Exploring the interplay of practice and scholarship (Vol. 13, pp. 3–14). London: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pinnegar, S., & Hamilton, M. L. (2009). Self-study of practice as a genre of qualitative research: Theory, methodology, and practice. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pithouse-Morgan, K., & Samaras, A. P. (2015). The power of “We” for professional learning. In K. Pithouse-Morgan & A. P. Samaras (Eds.), Polyvocal professional learning through self-study research (Vol. 18). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pyle, A., & Luce-Kapler, R. (2014). Looking beyond the academic and developmental logics in kindergarten education: The role of Schwab’s commonplaces in classroom-based research. Early child development and care, 184(12), 1960–1977. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2014.897945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, M. J. (2010). Commonplaces in practitioner curriculum deliberation. Research in the Schools, 17(2), 54–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1982). Consequences of pragmatism: Essays, 1972–1980. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, V., & Chan, E. (2008). Chapter 1: Schwab’s call for a renaissance. Action in Teacher Education, 29(5–6), 4–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2008.10519430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, T. (2010). Self-study by teacher educators. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 689–694). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Samaras, A. P., & Freese, A. R. (2009). Looking back and looking forward: An historical overview of the self-study school. In C. A. Lassonde, S. Galman, & C. Kosnik (Eds.), Self-study research methodologies for teacher educators (Vol. 7, pp. 3–20). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandretto, S. (2009). Theoretical and methodological tensions in a poststructural, collaborative self-study research project. Studying Teacher Education, 5(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425960902830476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J. (1978). Joseph J. Schwab: Science, curriculum and liberal education—Selected essays. In I. Westbury & J. Wilkof (Eds.), The practical: A language for the curriculum (pp. 287–321). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. (2014). Criterial judgements in education: Knowledge and research. In A. Reid, P. Hart, & M. Peters (Eds.), A companion to research in education (pp. 425–431). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). The wisdom of practice: Knowledge growth in teaching. In D. C. Berliner & B. V. Rosenshine (Eds.), Talks to teachers. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1998). Teacher portfolios: A theoretical activity. In N. Lyons (Ed.), With portfolio in hand: Validating the new teacher professionalism (pp. 23–37). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (2004). The wisdom of practice: Essays on teaching, learning and learning to teach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tairab, H. H. (2003). The role of reflection in facilitating pre-service primary school teachers’ professional growth. Journal of Faculty of Education, 18(20).

    Google Scholar 

  • Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioural sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tidwell, D., & Fitzgerald, L. (2004). Self-study as teaching. In J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 1, pp. 69–102). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Timperley, H., & Robinson, V. (1998). Collegiality in schools: Its nature and implications for problem solving. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34, 608–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trumbull, D. (2004). Factors important for the scholarship of self-study of teacher education practices. In J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 12, pp. 1211–1230). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, Great Britain.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Trumbull, D. (2006). Sharing my teaching journal with my students. In P. Aubusson & S. Schuck (Eds.), Teacher learning and development: The mirror maze (pp. 67–82). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, J. (2004). Evidence in self-studies of teacher education practices. In J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 1, pp. 871–903). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zeichner, K. (1999). The new scholarship in teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(9), 4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

North, C.J. (2020). Self-Study Informed by Pragmatism and Schwab’s Commonplaces. In: Interrogating Authenticity in Outdoor Education Teacher Education. Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices, vol 21. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2176-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2176-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-2175-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-2176-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics