Skip to main content

Safety Leadership Functions Using Complexity Science

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Abstract

In order to put a proactive approach in place with regards to the prevention of workplace injuries, there is a lean towards the main determinants of safety; e.g. leadership. As a result of their vital role in organisations, leaders are seen as prime players in the creation of safe work environments. However, leadership is a complex, multi-phased concept which advocates that various leadership styles affect the outcome of safety in diverse ways. Therefore, this paper highlighted that complex systems predominantly focus on the relationship amongst teams, behavioural patterns and the interdependencies within an evolving system. Thus, applying the same concept to safety and leadership provided direction in practice and presented an unorthodox leadership construct that would enable managers to imbibe leadership apt for the twenty-first century. The aim of this paper was to develop a framework for safety leadership functions using complexity science. This study was centred on literature review based on the following themes—leadership style, complexity leadership theory and safety leadership. Discussions on the study carried out was presented, followed by a framework for safety leadership. This paper concluded that complexity science supports the flexibility, innovative and dynamism of leadership; not as a set of capabilities or standards innate in any one person.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baltaci A, Balci A (2017) Complexity leadership: a theorical perspective. Int J Educ Lead Manag 5(1):30–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Barling J, Loughlin C, Kelloway EK (2002) Development and test of a model linking safety-specific transformational leadership and occupational safety. J Appl Psychol 87(3):488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard C (1938) The functions of the executive. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass BM (1985) Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass BM, Avolio BJ, Jung DI, Berson Y (2003) Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. J Appl Psychol 88(2):207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burpo FJ (2006) The great captains of chaos: developing adaptive leaders. Mil Rev 86(1):64

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells M (2003) The power of identity: the information age: economy, society and culture, vol 2. The Information Age

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian MS, Bradley JC, Wallace JC, Burke MJ (2009) Workplace safety: a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. J Appl Psychol 94(5):1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers P (1999) ‘Complexity and postmodernism. Understanding complex systems’ Reply to David Spurrett. S Afr J Phil 18(2):275–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers P (2005) Complexity, deconstruction and relativism. Theory Cult Soc 22(5):255–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke S (2013) Safety leadership: a meta-analytic review of transformational and transactional leadership styles as antecedents of safety behaviours. J Occup Organ Psychol 86(1):22–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conchie SM, Donald IJ (2009) The moderating role of safety-specific trust on the relation between safety-specific leadership and safety citizenship behaviours. J Occup Health Psychol 14(2):137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner DR (1998) Leading at the edge chaos. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Coveney PV (2003) Self-organisation and complexity: a new age for theory, computation and experiment. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A Math Phys Eng Sci 361(1807):1057–1079

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • de Koster RB, Stam D, Balk BM (2011) Accidents happen: the influence of safety-specific transformational leadership, safety consciousness, and hazard reducing systems on warehouse accidents. J Oper Manag 29(7–8):753–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flin R, Yule S (2004) Leadership for safety: industrial experience. BMJ Qual Saf 13(2):45–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin MA, Neal A (2000) Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. J Occup Health Psychol 5(3):347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeister K, Gibbons AM, Johnson SK, Cigularov KP, Chen PY, Rosecrance JC (2014) The differential effects of transformational leadership facets on employee safety. Saf Sci 62:68–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann DA, Morgeson FP (2004) The role of leadership in safety. Psychol Work Saf 159–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Inness M, Turner N, Barling J, Stride CB (2010) Transformational leadership and employee safety performance: a within-person, between-jobs design. J Occup Health Psychol 15(3):279–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelloway EK, Mullen J, Francis L (2006) Divergent effects of transformational and passive leadership on employee safety. J Occup Health Psychol 11(1):76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kontopoulos KM (2006) The logics of social structure, vol 6. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin K, Lippitt R, White RK (1939) Patterns of aggressive behaviour in experimentally created social climates. J Soc Psychol 10(2):269–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein BB, Uhl-Bien M, Marion R, Seers A, Orton JD, Schreiber C (2006) Complexity leadership theory: an interactive perspective on leading in complex adaptive systems. Emerg Complex Organ 2–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Marion R (2008) Complexity theory for organisations and organisational leadership. Complex Lead 1:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Marion R, Uhl-Bien M (2001) Leadership in complex organisations. Lead Q 12(4):389–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullen JE, Kelloway EK (2009) Safety leadership: a longitudinal study of the effects of transformational leadership on safety outcomes. J Occup Organ Psychol 82(2):253–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford MD, Bedell-Avers KE, Hunter ST (2008) Planning for innovation: a multi-level perspective. In: Multi-level issues in creativity and innovation. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp 107–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahrgang JD, Morgeson FP, Hofmann DA (2011) Safety at work: a meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes. J Appl Psychol 96(1):71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neal A, Griffin MA, Hart PM (2000) The impact of organisational climate on safety climate and individual behaviour. Saf Sci 34(1–3):99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojuola J, Mostafa S, Mohamed S (2018) Construction safety leadership: a complexity perspective. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on construction project management and construction engineering (iCCPMCE-2018), 03–06 Dec 2018, Sydney, Australia, pp 104–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick P (1948) Foundations of the theory of organisation. Am Sociol Rev 13(1):25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snowden DJ, Boone ME (2007) A leader’s framework for decision making. Harv Bus Rev 85(11):68

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien M, Marion R, McKelvey B (2007) Complexity leadership theory: shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. Lead Q 18(4):298–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zohar D (1980) Safety climate in industrial organisations: theoretical and applied implications. J Appl Psychol 65(1):96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zohar D (2002) The effects of leadership dimensions, safety climate, and assigned priorities on minor injuries in work groups. J Organ Behav 23(1):75–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zohar D (2014) Safety climate: conceptualization, measurement, and improvement. In: The Oxford handbook of organisational climate and culture, pp 317–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohar D, Tenne-Gazit O (2008) Transformational leadership and group interaction as climate antecedents: a social network analysis. J Appl Psychol 93(4):744

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sherif Mohamed .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ojuola, J., Mostafa, S., Mohamed, S. (2020). Safety Leadership Functions Using Complexity Science. In: Panuwatwanich, K., Ko, CH. (eds) The 10th International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Production Management . Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1910-9_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1910-9_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-1909-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-1910-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics