Abstract
We describe the basic ideas of factorization algebras on manifolds and topological chiral homology, with emphasis on their gluing properties.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, D.W.: Chain functors and homology theories. In: Symposium Algebraic Topology. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 249, pp. 1–12 (1971)
Ayala, D., Francis, J.: Factorization homology of topological manifolds. J. Topol. 8(4), 1045–1084 (2015)
Beilinson, A., Drinfeld, V.: Chiral Algebras. American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications. vol. 51, vi\(+\)375 pp. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (2004). ISBN: 0-8218-3528-9
Boardman, J.M., Vogt, R.M.: Homotopy invariant algebraic structures on topological spaces. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 347. Springer, Berlin-New York (1973)
Calaque, D.: Around Hochschild (co)homology. Habilitation thesis, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (2013)
Costello, K., Gwilliam, O.: Factorization algebras in quantum field theory. Draft available at http://www.math.northwestern.edu/~costello/
Dunn, G.: Tensor product of operads and iterated loop spaces. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 50(3), 237–258 (1988)
Ginot, G.: Notes on factorization algebras, factorization homology and applications. Calaque, D. et al. (ed.) Mathematical aspects of quantum field theories. Springer. Mathematical Physics Studies, pp. 429–552 (2015)
Ginot, G., Tradler, T., Zeinalian, M.: Higher Hochschild homology, topological chiral homology and factorization algebras. Commun. Math. Phys. 326(3), 635–686 (2014)
Kontsevich, M.: Operads and motives in deformation quantization. Mosh Flato (1937–1998). Lett. Math. Phys. 48(1), 35–72 (1999)
Lurie, J.: Higher Algebra (2017). http://www.math.harvard.edu/~lurie/
Matsuoka, T.: Descent properties of the topological chiral homology. Münster J. Math. 10, 83–118 (2017). Mathematical Reviews MR3624103. Available via https://www.uni-muenster.de/FB10/mjm/vol10.html
Pirashvili, T.: Hodge decomposition for higher order Hochschild homology. Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 33(2), 151–179 (2000)
Acknowledgements
The author is grateful to the anonymous referee for the fair criticism and helpful suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
A Factorization Algebra on an Orbifold
-
1
Let \(\mathscr {A}\) be as in Sect. 3. Then Theorem 25 implies that the contravariant functor \(M\mapsto \mathrm {Alg}^\mathrm {loc}_M(\mathscr {A})\) on the category \(\mathrm {Man}^{}\) of manifolds and open embeddings, extends uniquely to a sheaf on the category (enriched in groupoids) of orbifolds and local diffeomorphisms (or “étale” maps) between them. Indeed the (\(\infty , 1\))- (or 2-) categories of sheaves (of e.g., (\(\infty , 1\))-categories) on these categories are equivalent.
For an orbifold X, it would perhaps make sense to refer to the value associated to X by this extended sheaf, as the (\(\infty , 1\))-category “of locally constant factorization algebras on X”. This defines a notion of locally constant factorization algebra on X.
The purpose of this appendix is to give a concrete description of this notion of locally constant factorization algebra on an orbifold, which also leads to a very simple description of the functoriality of the (\(\infty , 1\))-category of locally constant factorization algebras with respect to local diffeomorphisms.
-
2
Let us denote by \(\mathrm {Orb}\), the category enriched in groupoids of orbifolds with local diffeomorphisms as morphisms. We denote by \(\bar{\mathrm {Man}}\phantom {{\mathrm {Man}}}^{}\), the category of manifolds with local diffeomorphisms as morphisms. We have a non-full and full inclusions
(As any other category, we treat all these categories as (\(\infty , 1\))-categories.)
Let X be an orbifold. Then by \({{\,\mathrm{LocDiff}\,}}(X)\), we mean \(\mathrm {Man}^{}_{/X}\). The coCartesian symmetric monoidal structure on \(\bar{\mathrm {Man}}\phantom {{\mathrm {Man}}}^{}_{/X}\) (i.e., the symmetric monoidal structure given by the finite coproduct operations) restricts to a symmetric monoidal structure on \({{\,\mathrm{LocDiff}\,}}(X)\).
Given an object \((M,f)\in {{\,\mathrm{LocDiff}\,}}(X)\), where M is a manifold, and \(f:M\rightarrow X\) is a local diffeomorphism, we obtain an induced symmetric monoidal functor \(f_!:\mathrm {Open}(M)\rightarrow {{\,\mathrm{LocDiff}\,}}(X)\). Thus, we obtain from a symmetric monoidal functor \(A:{{\,\mathrm{LocDiff}\,}}{X}\rightarrow \mathscr {A}\), a prefactorization algebra \(f^*A:=A\circ f_!\) on M.
One sees from the definitions, that a locally constant factorization algebra on X is equivalent as a datum to a symmetric monoidal functor \({{\,\mathrm{LocDiff}\,}}(X)\rightarrow \mathscr {A}\) for which \(f^*A\) is a locally constant factorization algebra on M for every object (M, f) of \({{\,\mathrm{LocDiff}\,}}(X)\). Equivalently, A should be locally constant in disks over X (i.e., on \(\bar{\mathrm {Disk}}\phantom {{\mathrm {Disk}}}(X)\) defined below), and such that the canonical map \(A(M,f)\leftarrow {{\,\mathrm{colim}\,}}_{\mathrm {Disj}(M)}f^*A\) is an equivalence for every (M, f).
-
3
We can also express a locally constant factorization algebra on X as a locally constant algebra over suitable disks over X.
Let \(\bar{\mathrm {Disk}}\phantom {{\mathrm {Disk}}}(X)\) denote the full submulticategory of (the underlying multicategory of) \({{\,\mathrm{LocDiff}\,}}(X)\), where the object \((U,i)\in {{\,\mathrm{LocDiff}\,}}(X)\) for a manifold U and a local diffeomorphism \(i:U\rightarrow X\), belongs to \(\bar{\mathrm {Disk}}\phantom {{\mathrm {Disk}}}(X)\) if there exists a diffeomorphism of U with a finite dimensional Euclidean space.
Now, given a general object (M, f) of \({{\,\mathrm{LocDiff}\,}}(X)\), locally constant factorization algebras on M were equivalent to locally constant \(\mathrm {Disk}(M)\)-algebras, but the functor \(f_!\) identifies multimaps in \(\mathrm {Disk}(M)\) with multimaps in \(\bar{\mathrm {Disk}}\phantom {{\mathrm {Disk}}}(X)\). It follows that a locally constant factorization on X is equivalent as a datum to a locally constant algebra on \(\bar{\mathrm {Disk}}\phantom {{\mathrm {Disk}}}(X)\).
-
4
Let \(f:X\rightarrow Y\) be local diffeomorphism of orbifolds. For a locally constant factorization algebra A on Y, we obtain a simple description of the pull-back \(f^*A\) of A by f. Indeed, we obtain the induced symmetric monoidal functor \(f_!:{{\,\mathrm{LocDiff}\,}}(X)\rightarrow {{\,\mathrm{LocDiff}\,}}(Y)\), and, it follows from the above description of locally constant factorization algebras on orbifolds, that there is a natural equivalence
$$\begin{aligned} f^*A=A\circ f_! \end{aligned}$$(46)of symmetric monoidal functors on \({{\,\mathrm{LocDiff}\,}}(X)\).
Proposition 47
Let \(p:U\rightarrow X\) be a surjective local diffeomorphism of orbifolds. Then a symmetric monoidal functor \(A:{{\,\mathrm{LocDiff}\,}}(X)\rightarrow \mathscr {A}\) is a locally constant factorization algebra on X if and only if \(A\circ p_!:{{\,\mathrm{LocDiff}\,}}(U)\rightarrow \mathscr {A}\) is a locally constant factorization algebra on U.
Proof
The necessity is clear from the equivalence (46).
For the converse, assume that \(A\circ p_!\) is a locally constant factorization algebra on U. Then, for a manifold M and a local diffeomorphism \(f:M\rightarrow X\), we need to prove that the prefactorization algebra \(f^*A\) on M is a locally constant factorization algebra.
The assumption implies that \(U_M:=U\times _XM\) is a manifold, and the projection \(p_M:U_M\rightarrow M\) is a surjective local diffeomorphism. Therefore, it suffices by Theorem 25, to prove for every \(V\in \mathrm {Open}(U_M)\times _{{{\,\mathrm{LocDiff}\,}}(M)}\mathrm {Open}(M)\), that \((f^*A)\mathclose {|}_{V}\) is a locally constant factorization algebra on V.
However, the composite \(\mathrm {Open}(V)\hookrightarrow \mathrm {Open}(M)\xrightarrow {f_!}{{\,\mathrm{LocDiff}\,}}(X)\) is isomorphic to the composite
where \(g:V\rightarrow U\) denotes the inclusion \(V\hookrightarrow U_M\) followed by the projection \(U_M\rightarrow U\), which is a local diffeomorphism.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Matsuoka, T. (2020). Some Technical Aspects of Factorization Algebras on Manifolds. In: Ohsawa, T., Minami, N. (eds) Bousfield Classes and Ohkawa's Theorem. BouCla 2015. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 309. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1588-0_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1588-0_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-1587-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-1588-0
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)