Skip to main content

Fournier (BRQ) Versus Rusbult (IM): Is Love Really Important in Consumer-Brand Relationship?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Marketing and Smart Technologies

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 167))

Abstract

Assuming the meaning and value that brands have for consumers, this paper developed a structured viewpoint in the consumer-brand relationship. This paper explores the fact that there are deep investments by consumers in their relationships with brands. The objectives of the article are, first, to present the two main consumer-brand relationship models (Brand Relationship Quality—BRQ, Investment Model—IM) and, second, to challenge the importance of Love in the relationships established between consumers and brands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Copeland, M.T.: Relation of consumers’ buying habits to marketing methods. Harv. Bus. Rev. 1(3), 282–289 (1923)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gardner, B.B., Levy, S.J.: The product and the brand. Harv. Bus. Rev. 33–39 (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Breivik, E., Thorbjørnsen, H.: Consumer brand relationships: an investigation of two alternative models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 36(4), 443–472 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-008-0115-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fournier, S.: Consumers and their brands: developing relationship theory in consumer research. J. Consum. Res. 24(4), 343–353 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1086/209515

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Loureiro, S.M.C.: Consumer-brand relationship relationship: Consumer foundation and state-of-art. In: Kaufmann H., Panni M. (eds.) Customer-Centric Marketing Strategies: Tools for Building Organizational Performance, pp. 414–434. Business Science Reference, Hershey, PA (2012). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2524-2.ch020

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Le, B., Agnew, C.R.: Commitment and its theorized determinants: a meta-analysis of the investment model 10 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ambler, T., Styles, C.: Brand development versus new product development: towards a process model of extension decisions. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 6(1), 13–26 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1108/10610429710160002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gabbott, M., Jevons, C.: Brand community in search of theory: an endless spiral of ambiguity. Mark. Theory 9(1), 119–122 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593108100066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Grönroos, C.: Relationship approach to marketing in service contexts: the marketing and organizational behavior interface. J. Bus. Res. 20(1), 3–11 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kapferer, J.-N., Laurent, G.: La sensibilité aux marques. In: Kapferer J.N., Thoenig J.C. (eds.) La Marque: Moteur de la Competitivité des Entreprises et de la Croissance de l’Économie, pp. 93–124. McGraw-Hill, Paris (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Keller, K.L.: Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity, 2nd edn. (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Srivastava, R.K., Shocker, A.D.: Brand equity: a perspective on its meaning and measurement. Marketing Science Institute (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brito, C.: Uma abordagem relacional ao valor da marca. Revista Portuguesa e Brasileira de Gestão 9(1–2), 49–63 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jacoby, J., Szybillo, G.J., Busato-Schach, J.: Information acquisition behavior in brand choice situations. J. Consum. Res. 3(4), 209 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1086/208669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Murphy, J.: What is branding? In: Hart S., Murphy, J. (eds.) Brands, The New Wealth Creators, pp. 1–12. Macmillan, London (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Srinivasan, T.C.: An integrative approach to consumer choice. In: Wallendorf M., Anderson P. (eds.) Advances in Consumer Research, pp. 96–100. Association for Consumer Research, Provo, Ut (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chernatony, L.: From brand vision to brand evaluation. J. Commun. Manag. Lond. 6, 295–296 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Barnes, J.G.: Establishing meaningful customer relationships: why some companies and brands mean more to their customers. Manag. Serv. Qual. Int. J. 13(3), 178–186 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520310476445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rosenbaum-Elliott, R., Percy, L., Pervan, S.: Strategic brand management (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Morgan, R.M., Hunt, S.D.: The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. J. Mark. 58(July), 20–38 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Oliver, R.L.: A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. J. Mark. Res. 17, 460–469 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Oliver, R.L.: Whence consumer loyalty? J. Mark. 63, 33–44; Bax, M.: Design science: filosofia da pesquisa em ciência da informação e tecnologia. Ciência da Informação 42(2), 298–312 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L.: A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. J. Mark. 49, 41–50 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L.: SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J. Retail. 64(1), 12–40 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gummesson, E.: The new marketing-developing long-term interactive relationships. Long Range Plan. 20(4), 10–20 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Batra, R., Ahuvia, A., Bagozzi, R.P.: Brand love. J. Mark. 76(March), 1–16 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rusbult, C.E.: Commitment and Satisfaction in Romantic Associations: A Test of the investment Model 186, 172–186 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kelley, H.H., Thibaut, J.W.: Interpersonal relations: a theory of interdependence (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Thibaut, J.W., Kelley, H.H.: The social psychology of groups (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Agnew, C.R., Van Lange, P.A.M., Rusbult, C. E., Langston, C.: Cognitive interdependence: commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 74(4), 939–954 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Becker, H.S.: Notes on the concept of commitment. Am. J. Sociol. 66(1), 32–40 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Schelling, T.C.: An essay on bargaining. Am. Econ. Rev. 46(3), 281–306 (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Blau, P.M.: Exchange and power in social life (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rusbult, C.E.: A longitudinal test of the investment model: the impact on job satisfaction, job commitment, and turnover of variations in rewards, costs, alternatives, and investments 68(3), 429–438 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rusbult, C.E., Martz, O.J.M., Agnew, C.R.: The investment model scale: measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size 5, 357–391 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lin, Y.-H.W., Rusbult, C.E.: Commitment to dating relationships and cross-sex friendships in America and China. J. Soc.Pers. Relationsh. 12(1), 7–26 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407595121002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Duffy, S.M., Rusbult, C.E.: Satisfaction and commitment in homosexual and heterosexual relationships. J. Homosex. 12(2), 1–23 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rusbult, C.E., Martz, J.M.: Remaining in an abusive relationship: an investment model analysis of nonvoluntary dependence. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 21, 558–571 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wilson, P.M., Rodgers, W.M., Carpenter, P.J., Hall, C., Hardy, J., Fraser, S.N.: The relationship between commitment and exercise behavior 5, 405–421 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1469-0292(03)00035-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Carpenter, P.J., Scanlan, T.K.: Changes over time in the determinants of sport commitment. Pediatr. Exerc. Sci. 10(see 20), 356–365 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Raedeke, T.D.: Is athlete burnout more than just stress? A sport commitment perspective. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 19, 396–417 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Koslowsky, M., Kluger, A.: Commitment to participation in musical activities: an extension and application of the investment model. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 16(9), 831–844 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Putnam, D.E., Finney, J.W., Barkley, P.L., Bonner, M.J.: Enhancing commitment improves adherence to a medical regimen. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 62(1), 191–194 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Geyer, P.D., Brannon, Y.S., Shearon, R.W.: The prediction of students’ satisfaction with community college vocational training. J. Psychol. 121(6), 591–597 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ping, R.A.: Voice in business-to-business relationships: cost-of-exit and demographic antecedents 73, 261–281 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lyons, W.E., Lowery, D.: Citizens responses to dissatisfaction in urban communities: a partial test of a general model. J. Polit. 51(4), 841–868 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sung, Y., Choi, S.M.: “I won’t leave you although you disappoint me”: the interplay between satisfaction, investment, and alternatives in determining consumer-brand relationship commitment. Psychol. Mark. 27(11), 1050–1073 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/mar

  48. Ahuvia, A.: Beyond the extended self: loved objects and consumers’ identity narratives. J. Consum. Res. 32(June), 171–184 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Albert, N., Merunka, D., Valette-Florence, P.: When consumers love their brands: exploring the concept and its dimensions. J. Bus. Res. 61(10), 1062–1075 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.09.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Escalas, J.E., Bettman, J.R.: Self-construal, reference groups, and brand meaning. J. Consum. Res. 32(3), 378–389 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1086/497549

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Luís Reis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cayolla, R., Loureiro, S., Reis, J.L. (2020). Fournier (BRQ) Versus Rusbult (IM): Is Love Really Important in Consumer-Brand Relationship?. In: Rocha, Á., Reis, J., Peter, M., Bogdanović, Z. (eds) Marketing and Smart Technologies. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 167. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1564-4_32

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics