Skip to main content

Robust Denoising Technique for Ultrasound Images Based on Weighted Nuclear Norm Minimization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
International Conference on Innovative Computing and Communications

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1087))

Abstract

Image denoising is an efficacious pre-processing requisite procedure of ultrasound image investigation. In this study two denoising techniques adopted and evaluated to compare their performance. The widespread use of ultrasound images facilitates the diagnosis of various diseases. They pose several challenges and hence efficient pre-processing pipelines are essential to extract useful diagnostic information from the images. Much light is thrown on the Common carotid artery (CCA) images in this study. Two approaches are endorsed for image denoising involving and converting to grayscale for effective diagnosis. Weighted nuclear norm minimization (WNNM) approach is found to be more impressive and better. This also bolstered the validation methods computed in the work. It pretends that the study is useful in extracting diagnostic information. The experimental results impart authenticity to the proposed technique in the adequate analysis of ultrasound images. The principle objective of this work is to aid and accentuate the succeeding processing stages such as segmentation and object recognition to facilitate accurate and exact diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. P. Gravel, G. Beaudoin, J.A. De Guise, A method for modeling noise in medical images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 23(10), 1221–1232 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Verma, J. Ali, A comparative study of various types of image noise and efficient noise removal techniques. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. Softw. Eng. 3(10), 617–622 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Zukal, R. Beneš, P. Číka, K. Říha, (n.d.), Towards an optimal interest point detector for measurements in ultrasound images. Meas. Sci. Rev. 13(6), 329–338 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. K. Sumathi et al., Anisotropic diffusion filter based edge enhancement for the segmentation of carotid intima-media layer in ultrasound images using variational level set method without re-initialisation, in Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE (IEEE, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.F. Polak et al., Edge-detected common carotid artery intima-media thickness and incident coronary heart disease in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. J. Am. Heart Assoc., 1–9 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Benes, K. Riha, Noise reduction in medical ultrasound images. Electron. Revenue 2(3), 1–8 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Xian et al., Automatic breast ultrasound image segmentation: a survey. Pattern Recogn. 79, 340–355 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Mounica, S. Ramakrishnan, B. Thamotharan, A study on preprocessing techniques for ultrasound images of carotid artery, in International Conference on ISMAC in Computational Vision and Bio-Engineering (Springer, Cham, 2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. P.S. Parvaze, S. Ramakrishnan, Extraction of multiple cellular objects in HEp-2 images using LS segmentation. IEIE Trans. Smart Process. Comput. 6(6), 401–408 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Gu et al., Weighted nuclear norm minimization and its applications to low level vision. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 121(2), 183–208 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Gu, L. Zhang, W. Zuo, X. Feng, Weighted nuclear norm minimization with application to image denoising, in IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014), pp. 2862–2869

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Zhang, L. Zhang, X. Mou, D. Zhang, FSIM: a feature similarity index for image quality assessment. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 20(8), 2378–2386 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Hore, D. Ziou, Image quality metrics: PSNR vs. SSIM, in 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Istanbul (2010), pp. 2366–2369

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Xu et al., Speckle suppression of ultrasonography using maximum likelihood estimation and weighted nuclear norm minimization, in 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (IEEE, 2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Buades, B. Coll, J. Morel, A non-local algorithm for image denoising, in 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’05), San Diego, CA, USA, vol. 2 (2005), pp. 60–65

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaik Mahaboob Basha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shaik Mahaboob Basha, Jinaga, B.C. (2020). Robust Denoising Technique for Ultrasound Images Based on Weighted Nuclear Norm Minimization. In: Khanna, A., Gupta, D., Bhattacharyya, S., Snasel, V., Platos, J., Hassanien, A. (eds) International Conference on Innovative Computing and Communications. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1087. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1286-5_66

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics