Skip to main content

Privacy Against Adversarial Hypothesis Testing: Theory and Application to Smart Meter Privacy Problem

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Hypothesis testing is the fundamental theory behind decision-making and therefore plays a critical role in information systems. A prominent example is machine learning, which is currently developed and applied to a wide range of applications. However, besides the utilities, hypothesis testing can also be implemented for an illegitimate purpose to infer on people’s privacy. Thus, the development of hypothesis testing techniques further increases the privacy leakage risks. Accordingly, the research on privacy-by-design techniques that enhance the privacy against adversarial hypothesis testing receives more and more attention recently. In this chapter, the problem of privacy against adversarial hypothesis testing is formulated in the presence of a distortion source. Information-theoretic fundamental bounds on the optimal privacy performance and corresponding privacy-enhancing technologies are first discussed under the assumption of independent and identically distributed adversarial observations. The discussion is then extended to considering a privacy problem model with memory. In the end, applications of the theoretic results and privacy-enhancing technologies to the smart meter privacy problem are illustrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This setting assumes an energy measure precision.

References

  1. Van Trees HL (2001) Detection, estimation, and modulation theory, Part I. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  2. Varshney PK (1996) Distributed detection and data fusion. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chernoff H (1952) A measure of asymptotic efficiency for tests of a hypothesis based on the sum of observations. Ann Math Stat 23:493–507

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Cover TM, Thomas JA (2006) Elements of information theory. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mhanna M, Piantanida P (2015) On secure distributed hypothesis testing. In: Proceeding of IEEE ISIT 2015, pp 1605–1609

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barni M, Tondi B (2016) Source distinguishability under distortion-limited attack: an optimal transport perspective. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 11:2145–2159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sreekumar S, Gündüz D, Cohen A (2018) Distributed hypothesis testing under privacy constraints. Proc IEEE ITW 2018:470–474

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liao J, Sankar L, Tan VYF, Calmon FP (2018) Hypothesis testing under mutual information privacy constraints in the high privacy regime. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 13:1058–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Calmon FP, Fawaz N (2012) Privacy against statistical inference. Proc Allerton 2012:1401–1408

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li Z, Oechtering TJ (2015) Privacy-aware distributed Bayesian detection. IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process 9:1345–1357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li Z, Oechtering TJ, Skoglund M (2016) Privacy-preserving energy flow control in smart grids. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICASSP 2016, pp 2194–2198

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nadendla VSS, Varshney PK (2016) Design of binary quantizers for distributed detection under secrecy constraints. IEEE Trans Signal Process 64:2636–2648

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Li Z, Oechtering TJ (2017) Privacy-constrained parallel distributed Neyman–Pearson test. IEEE Trans Signal Inf Process Netw 3:77–90

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. You Y, Li Z, Oechtering TJ (2018) Optimal privacy-enhancing and cost-efficient energy management strategies for smart grid consumers. Proc IEEE SSP 2018:826–830

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li Z, Oechtering TJ (2018) Privacy-utility management of hypothesis tests. In: Proceedings of IEEE ITW 2018, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  16. Li Z, Oechtering TJ, Gündüz D (2019) Privacy against a hypothesis testing adversary. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 14:1567–1581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Giaconi G, Gündüz D, Poor HV (2018) Privacy-aware smart metering: progress and challenges. IEEE Signal Process Mag 35:59–78

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rajagopalan SR, Sankar L, Mohajer S, Poor HV (2011) Smart meter privacy: a utility-privacy framework. In: Proceedings of IEEE SmartGridComm 2011, pp 190–195

    Google Scholar 

  19. Garcia FD, Jacobs B (2010) Privacy-friendly energy-metering via homomorphic encryption. In: Proceedings of STM 2010, pp 226–238

    Google Scholar 

  20. Efthymiou C, Kalogridis G (2010) Smart grid privacy via anonymization of smart metering data. In: Proceedings of IEEE SmartGridComm 2010, pp 238–243

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gündüz D, Gómez-Vilardebó J (2013) Smart meter privacy in the presence of an alternative energy source. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICC 2013, pp 2027–2031

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gómez-Vilardebó J, Gündüz D (2015) Smart meter privacy for multiple users in the presence of an alternative energy source. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 10:132–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Giaconi G, Gündüz D, Poor HV (2018) Smart meter privacy with renewable energy and an energy storage device. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 13:129–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yao J, Venkitasubramaniam P (2013) On the privacy-cost tradeoff of an in-home power storage mechanism. In: Proceedings of Allerton 2013, pp 115–122

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tan O, Gómez-Vilardebó J, Gündüz D (2017) Privacy-cost trade-offs in demand-side management with storage. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 12:1458–1469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Li S, Khisti A, Mahajan A (2018) Information-theoretic privacy for smart metering systems with a rechargeable battery. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 64:3679–3695

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Ács G, Castelluccia C (2011) I have a DREAM! (DiffeRentially privatE smArt Metering). In: Proceedings of IH 2011, pp 118–132

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang Z, Qin Z, Zhu L, Weng J, Ren K (2017) Cost-friendly differential privacy for smart meters: exploiting the dual roles of the noise. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 8:619–626

    Google Scholar 

  29. Eibl G, Engel D (2017) Differential privacy for real smart metering data. Comput Sci Res Dev 32:173–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Csiszár I, Körner J (2011) Information theory: coding theorems for discrete memoryless systems. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nikaidô H (1954) On von Neumann’s minimax theorem. Pac J Math 4:65–72

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Krishnamurthy V (2016) Partially observed markov decision processes: from filtering to controlled sensing. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bellman R (1954) The theory of dynamic programming. Bull Am Math Soc 60:503–516

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Van Erven T, Harremoës P (2014) Rényi divergence and Kullback–Leibler divergence. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 60:3797–3820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kolter JZ, Johnson MJ (2011) REDD: a public data set for energy disaggregation research. In: Proceedings of the SustKDD workshop on data mining applications in sustainability, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zuxing Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Li, Z., You, Y., Oechtering, T.J. (2020). Privacy Against Adversarial Hypothesis Testing: Theory and Application to Smart Meter Privacy Problem. In: Farokhi, F. (eds) Privacy in Dynamical Systems. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0493-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics