Abstract
Based on the principle of high probability of evidence, the trial court finds that the contract-issuing party’s use of its commercial housing to offset project payment in arrears and the following conclusion of the sales contract of commercial housing with the actual constructor is valid.
Collegial panel judges of the Supreme People’s Court for re-trial: Feng Xiaoguang, Luo Dian, Wan Ting (Written by: Feng Xiaoguang, Supreme People’s Court; Translated by: Niu benlin).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Law Press China
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Feng, X. (2020). Panjin Urban Construction and Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. v. Xu X (Dispute over Real Estate Sales Contract)—When One Litigant Applies for Retrial, Whether Its Provision of Criminal Investigation Material of the Other Suspected of Committing a Crime is Sufficient to Overturn Facts Found in the Original Judgment. In: Selected Cases from the Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China. Library of Selected Cases from the Chinese Court. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0342-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0342-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0341-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0342-9
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)