Skip to main content

Entrepreneurship: Nation as a Context

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

Abstract

Entrepreneurship contributes not only to economic growth, but also to overall development of the country. Entrepreneurship is highly contextual. It is important to understand how ‘context’ influences entrepreneurship, because country-specific intervention is needed to promote entrepreneurship in different countries. Thus, the present study considers ‘Nation’ as a context at the primary level and then analyses country-specific micro-level contextual factors to understand its impact on entrepreneurship. Recognizing the commonality of culture in ‘South Asian Nations’ and ‘Central Asian Nations’, and also uniqueness in historical backgrounds, five countries—Bangladesh, India, Kazakhstan, Nepal and Russia—have been chosen purposely for the study. We used ‘Narrative Perspective’ for this Phenomenological study to build up narratives on important concepts. Theory building approach suggested by Carlile and Christensen (The cycles of theory building in management research, 2005) and Christensen (The ongoing process of building a theory of disruption. J Prod Innov Manage 23:39–55, 2006) has also inspired the study. Based on the findings, several propositions have been developed, which open up the agenda for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acs, Z., & Virgill, N. (2009). Entrepreneurship in developing countries. Retrieved on December 2, 2016 from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.415.9691&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

  • Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, B. (1988). Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: The case for intention. The Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 442–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P. J., & Coyne, C. J. (2009). Context matters: Institutions and entrepreneurship. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 5(3), 135–209. https://doi.org/10.1561/0300000018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlile, P. R., & Christensen, C. M. (2005). The cycles of theory building in management research. Retrieved on April 19, 2019 from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.335.2372&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

  • Chamberlain, D. (1990). The concept of narrative perspective. In Narrative perspective in fiction: A phenomenological meditation of reader, text, and world (pp. 77–129). University of Toronto Press. Retrieved on April 19, 2019 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3138/j.ctt2ttgv0.8.

  • Christensen, C. M. (2006). The ongoing process of building a theory of disruption. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23, 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, J. B., & Lischeron, J. (1991). Defining entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 29, 45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W. B. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. The Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 696–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W. B. (1988). “Who is an entrepreneur?” Is the wrong question. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 13(4), 47–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. D., & Webb, J. W. (2007). A cross-disciplinary exploration of entrepreneurship research. Journal of Management, 33(6), 891–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazear, E. P. (2005). Entrepreneurship. Journal of Labor Economics, 23(4), 649–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misra, S., & Kumar, E. S. (2000). Resourcefulness: A proximal conceptualisation of entrepreneurial behaviour. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 9(2), 135–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moroz, P. W., & Hindle, K. (2011). Entrepreneurship as a process: Toward harmonising multiple perspectives. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 781–818. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00452.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naudé, W. (2013). Entrepreneurship and economic development: Theory, evidence and policy. IZA Discussion Paper No. 7507. Retrieved on December 2, 2016 from http://iza.org/dp7507.pdf.

  • Paltasingh, T. (2012). Entrepreneurship education & culture of enterprise: Relevance & policy issues. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 48(2), 233–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejai, M., & Enloe, C. H. (1969). Nation-states and state-nations. International Studies Quarterly, 13(2), 140–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripsas, S. (1998). Toward an interdisciplinary theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 10, 103–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shinnar, R. S., Giacomin, O., & Janssen, F. (2012). Entrepreneurial perceptions and intentions: The role of gender and culture. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 465–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00509.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (2010). The role of entrepreneurship in economic growth. Retrieved on December 2, 2016 from http://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1064&context=uer.

  • Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Praag, M., & Versloot, P. H. (2007). What is the value of entrepreneurship? A review of recent research. Small Business Economics, 29(4), 351–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatarman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor’s perspective. In J. Katz & R. Brockhaus (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). What theory is not, theorizing is. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 385–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei-Skillern, J., Austin, J. E., Leonard, H., & Stevenson, H. (2007). Entrepreneurship in the social sector. New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship-conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A. (2007). Contextualizing theory building in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 443–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Web links

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Archana Singh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Singh, A., Majumdar, S. (2020). Entrepreneurship: Nation as a Context. In: Majumdar, S., Reji, E. (eds) Methodological Issues in Social Entrepreneurship Knowledge and Practice. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9769-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics