Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Agroforestry for Carbon Sequestration in Tropical India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Carbon Management in Tropical and Sub-Tropical Terrestrial Systems

Abstract

Our atmosphere naturally contains CO2, CH4, N2O, water vapor, and other gases creating a natural greenhouse effect. But increased concentrations of these gases in the atmosphere have created an imbalance and have enhanced the greenhouse effect causing warming of the globe. Global warming will adversely affect hundreds of millions of people and will pose serious threats to the global food system and to rural livelihoods. Global warming is mainly the result of rising CO2 levels in the Earth’s atmosphere. CO2 concentration in the atmosphere is increasing at greater pace from decade to decade. To assure food security, adaptation, and mitigation to climate change is unavoidable. Many organizations worldwide are working for lowering CO2 concentration through various strategies like reduction in energy use, developing low- or no-carbon fuel, and CO2 sequestration by forestry/agroforestry and engineering techniques. Agroforestry has been recognized as a means to reduce CO2 emissions and enhance carbon sinks. Agroforestry systems (AFS) offer important opportunities of creating synergies between both adaptation and mitigation actions. Recent studies under various AFS in diverse ecological conditions showed that these systems increase and conserve aboveground and soil carbon stocks and also have an important role in increasing livelihood security and reducing vulnerability to climate change. The potential of agroforestry systems to accumulate C is estimated to 0.29–15.21 Mg ha−1 year−1. The carbon sequestration potential of AFS can be enhanced by stabilizing soil organic carbon through possible mechanisms including biochemical recalcitrance and physical protection and also reducing C losses. Furthermore, effectiveness of AFS to carbon sequestration depends on structure and functions of different component, environmental, and socio-economic factors. Carbon sequestration can be quantified by destructive or nondestructive methods. Implementing agroforestry on farmers’ fields for carbon sequestration will have major challenges which deserve to be addressed in an effective manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ajit DSK, Newaj R, Handa AK, Prasad R, Alam B, Rizvi RH, Gupta G, Pandey KK, Jain A, Uma (2013) Modeling analysis of potential carbon sequestration under existing agroforestry systems in three districts of Indo-Gangetic plains in India. Agrofor Syst 87(5):1129–1146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajit DSK, Handa AK, Sridhar KB, Jain A, Uma SP, Kaza M, Sah R, Prasad SMR, Sriram K (2014) Carbon sequestration assessment of block plantations at JSW Steels Limited. In Compendium of Abstracts, 3rd World Agroforestry Congress, organized by ICAR, WAC and ISAF at Delhi, 10–13 Feb 2014, pp 354–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajit DSK, Handa AK, Newaj R, Chavan SB, Alam B, Prasad R, Ram A, Rizvi RH, Jain AK, Uma TD, Shakhela RR, Patel AG, Dalvi VV, Saxena AK, Parihar AKS, Backiyavathy MR, Sudhagar RJ, Bandeswaran C, Gunasekaran S (2016) Estimating carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems at district level in ten selected states of India. Agrofor Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-9986-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akyeampong E (1999) Suitability of six hedgerow species for alley cropping on an acid infertile soil in Burundi. Trop Agric 76:83–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht A, Kandji ST (2003) Carbon sequestration in tropical agroforestry systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 99:15–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amezquita MC, Ibrahim M, Llanderal T, Buurman P, Amezquita E (2005) Carbon sequestration in pastures, silvopastoral systems and forests in four regions of the Latin American tropics. J Sustain For 21:31–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldock JA, Skjemstad JO (2000) Role of the soil matrix and minerals in protecting natural organic materials against biological attack. Geochemistry 31:697–710

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Batjes NH (1996) The total carbon and nitrogen in soils of the world. Eur J Soil Sci 47:151–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beare MH, McNeill SJ, Curtin PDRL, Jones HS, Dodd M, Sharp BJ (2014) Estimating the organic carbon stabilisation capacity and saturation deficit of soils: a New Zealand case study. Biogeochemistry 120:71–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beer J, Bonnemann A, Chavez W, Fassbender HW, Imbach AC, Martel I (1990) Modelling agroforestry systems of cacao (Theobroma cacao) with laurel (Cordia alliodora) or poro (Erythrina poeppigiana) in Costa Rica. V. Productivity indices, organic material models and sustainability over ten years. Agrofor Syst 12:229–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berner RA (2003) The long-term carbon cycle, fossil fuels and atmospheric composition. Nature 426:323–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chan Y (2008) Increasing soil organic carbon of agricultural land. Primefact 735:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan SK, Sharma SC, Chauhan R, Gupta N, Srivastava R (2010) Accounting poplar and wheat productivity for carbon sequestration in agrisilviculture system. Indian For 136(9):1174–1182

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jong BHJ, Montoya-Gomez G, Nelson K, Soto-Pinto L, Taylor J, Tipper R (1995) Community forest management and carbon sequestration: a feasibility study from Chiapas, Mexico. Interciencia 20:409–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhyani SK (2012) Agroforestry interventions in India: focus on environmental services and livelihood security. Indian J Agrofor 13(2):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhyani SK, Tripathi RS (2000) Biomass and production of fine and coarse roots of trees under agrisilvicultural practices in north-east India. Agrofor Syst 50(2):107–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhyani SK, Puri DN, Narain P (1996) Biomass production and rooting behaviour of Eucalyptus tereticornis Sm. on deep soils and riverbed bouldery lands of Doon Valley, India. Indian For 122(2):128–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhyani SK, Newaj R, Sharma AR (2009) Agroforestry: its relation with agronomy, challenges and opportunities. Indian J Agron 54(3):249–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhyani SK, Ram A, Dev I (2016) Potential of agroforestry systems in carbon sequestration in India. Indian J Agric Sci 86(9):1103–1112

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon RK (1995) Agroforestry systems: sources or sinks of greenhouse gases? Agrofor Syst 31:99–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dossa EL, Fernandes ECM, Reid WS, Ezui K (2008) Above- and belowground biomass, nutrient and carbon stocks contrasting an open-grown and a shaded coffee plantation. Agrofor Syst 72:103–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duguma B, Gockowski J, Bakala J (2001) Smallholder cacao (Theobroma cacao Linn.) cultivation in agroforestry systems of West and Central Africa: challenges and opportunities. Agrofor Syst 51:177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dungait JAJ, Hopkins DW, Gregory AS, Whitmore AP (2012) Soil organic matter turnover is governed by accessibility not recalcitrance. Glob Chang Biol 18:1781–1796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2001) State of the world’s forests 2001. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, pp 1–181

    Google Scholar 

  • FAOSTAT (2013) FAOSTAT database. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available at: http://faostat.fao.org/

  • Feng W, Plante AF, Six J (2013) Improving estimates of maximal organic carbon stabilization by fine soil particles. Biogeochemistry 112:81–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gama-Rodrigues EF, Nair PKR, Nair VD, Gama-Rodrigues AV, Baligar VC, Machado RCR (2010) Carbon storage in soil size fractions under two cacao agroforestry systems in Bahia. Brazil Environ Manag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9420-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale CL, Davidson EA (2002) Uncertain sinks in the shrubs. Nature 418:593–594

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami S, Verma KS, Kaushalm R (2013) Biomass and carbon sequestration in different agroforestry systems of a Western Himalayan watershed. Biol Agric Hortic. https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2013.855990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haile SG, Nair PKR, Nair VD (2008) Carbon storage of different soil-size fractions in Florida silvopastoral systems. J Environ Qual 37:1789–1797

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett DS (2009) Environmental amelioration potential of silvopastoral agroforestry systems of Spain: soil carbon sequestration and phosphorus retention. A dissertation submitted to University of Florida, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2007) Climate change 2000: the scientific basis. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RB, Banner JL, Pockman WT, Walls DH (2002) Ecosystem carbon loss with woody plant invasion of grasslands. Nature 418:623–626

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jose S (2009) Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agrofor Syst 76:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur B, Gupta SR, Singh G (2002) Carbon storage and nitrogen cycling in silvopastoral systems on a sodic soil in northwestern India. Agrofor Syst 54:21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby KR, Potvin C (2007) Variation in carbon storage among tree species: implications for the management of a small-scale carbon sink project. For Ecol Manag 246:208–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar BM, George SJ, Jamaludheen V, Suresh TK (1998) Comparison of biomass production, tree allometry and nutrient use efficiency of multipurpose trees grown in wood lot and silvopastoral experiments in Kerala, India. For Ecol Manag 112:145–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2001) Soils and the greenhouse effect. In: Lal R (ed) Soil carbon sequestration and the greenhouse effect. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 173–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2005) Soil carbon sequestration in natural and managed tropical forest ecosystems. Environmental Services of Agroforestry Systems. First World Congress on Agroforestry, Orlando, Florida, USA, 27 June–2 July 2004, Food Products Press. pp 1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2007) Soil carbon stocks under present and future climate with specific reference to European ecoregions. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 81:113–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2008) Soil carbon stocks under present and future climate with specific reference to European ecoregions. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 81:113–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz K, Lal R (2010) Carbon sequestration in forest ecosystems. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Makumba W, Akinnifesi FK, Janssen B, Oenema O (2007) Long-term impact of a gliricidia-maize intercropping system on carbon sequestration in southern Malawi. Agric Ecosyst Environ 118:237–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal SP, Singh P (1989) Intercropping field crops between rows of Leucaena leucocephala under rainfed conditions in northern India. Agrofor Syst 8(2):165–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montagnini F, Nair PKR (2004) Carbon sequestration: an underexploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 61:281–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Murthy IK, Gupta M, Tomar S, Munsi M, Tiwari R, Hegde GT, Ravindranath NH (2013) Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry Systems in India. J Earth Sci Clim Chang 4:131. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7617.1000131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mutuo PK, Cadisch G, Albrecht PCA, Verchot L (2005) Potential of agroforestry for carbon sequestration and mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from soils in the tropics. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 71:43–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR, Kumar BM, Nair VD (2009) Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 172:10–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR, Nair VD, Kumar BM, Showalter JM (2010) Carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems. Adv Agron 108:237–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Negi JDS, Bahuguna VK, Sharma DC (1990) Biomass production and distribution of nutrients in 2 years old teak (Tectona grandis) and gamhar (Gmelina arborea) plantation in Tripura. Indian For 116(9):681–686

    Google Scholar 

  • Negi MS, Tandon VN, Rawat HS (1995) Biomass and nutrient distribution in young teak (Tectona grandis) plantation in Tarai Region of Uttar Pradesh. Indian For 121(6):455–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Newaj R, Dhyani SK (2008) Agroforestry for carbon sequestration: scope and present status. Ind J Agrofor 10:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Newaj R, Dhyani SK, Chavan SB, Rizvi RH, Prasad R, Ajit, Alam B, Handa AK (2014) Methodologies for assessing biomass, carbon stock and carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems. Technical bulletin 2/2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Newaj R, Rizvi RH, Chaturvedi OP, Alam B, Prasad R, Kumar D, Handa AK (2017) A country level assessment of area under agroforestry and its carbon sequestration potential. Technical bulletin 2/2017, ICAR- Central Agroforestry Research Institute, Jhansi, pp. 1–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen C (2003) Rhizodeposition of organic C by plants: mechanisms and controls. Agronomie 23:375–396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oelbermann M, Voroney RP, Gordon AM (2004) Carbon sequestration in tropical and temperate agroforestry systems: a review with examples from Costa Rica and southern Canada agriculture. Ecosyst Environ 104:359–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parrotta JA (1999) Productivity, nutrient cycling and succession in single- and mixed-species stands of Casuarina equisetifolia, Eucalyptus robusta and Leucaena leucocephala in Puerto Rico. For Ecol Manag 124:45–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peichl M, Thevathasan NV, Gordon AM, Huss J, Abohassan RA (2006) Carbon sequestration potentials in temperate tree based intercropping systems, southern Ontario, Canada. Agrofor Syst 66:243–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad JVNS, Srinivas K, Rao CS, Ramesh C, Venkatravamma K, Venkateswarlu B (2012) Biomass productivity and carbon stocks of farm forestry and agroforestry systems of Leucaena and eucalyptus in Andhra Pradesh, India. Curr Sci 103(5):536–540

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rai P, Solanki KR, Singh UP (2000) Growth and biomass production of multipurpose tree species in natural grassland under semi-arid condition. Indian J Agrofor 2:101–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai AK, Solanki KR, Rai P (2002) Performance of Anogeissus pendula genotypes under agrisilviculture system. Indian J Agrofor 4(1):71–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao MR, Ong CK, Pathak P, Sharma MM (1991) Productivity of annual cropping and agroforestry systems on a shallow Alfisol in semi-arid India. Agrofor Syst 15:51–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao LGG, Joseph B, Sreemannarayana B (2000) Growth and biomass production of some important multipurpose tree species on rainfed sandy loam soils. Indian For 126(7):772–781

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasse DP, Rumpel C, Dignac MF (2005) Is soil carbon mostly root carbon? Mechanisms for a specific stabilization. Plant Soil 269:341–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richards M, Bruum TB, Campbell B, Gregersen LE, Huyer S, Kuntze V, Madsen STN, Oldvig MB, Vasileiou I (2016) How countries plan to address agricultural adaptation and mitigation: an analysis of Intended Nationally Determined Contributions. CCAFS dataset version 1.3 Copenhagen, Denmark: CGIAR Research program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS)

    Google Scholar 

  • Roshetko M, Delaney M, Hairiah K, Purnomosidhi P (2002) Carbon stocks in Indonesian homegarden systems: can smallholder systems be targeted for increased carbon storage? Am J Altern Agric 17:125–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha R, Jha P (2012) Carbon sequestration potentials of agroforestry systems under climate change scenario – brief review with special emphasis on North-Eastern Hill Regions. J Agric Phys 12(2):100–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Saha S, Nair PKR, Nair VD, Kumar BM (2009) Soil carbon stocks in relation to plant diversity of home gardens in Kerala, India. Agrofor Syst 76:53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrag DP (2007) Preparing to capture carbon. Science 315:812–813

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharrow SH, Ismail S (2004) Carbon and nitrogen storage in agroforests, tree plantations, and pastures in western Oregon, USA. Agrofor Syst 60:123–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SSSA (2001) Carbon sequestration: position of the Soil Science Society of America (SSSA). Available from: www.soils.org/pdf/pos_paper_carb_seq.pdf

  • Subba Rao A, Saha R (2014) Agroforestry for soil quality maintenance, climate change mitigation and ecosystem services. Indian Farm 63(11):26–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Swamy SL, Puri S (2005) Biomass production and C-sequestration of Gmelina arborea in plantation and agroforestry system in India. Agrofor Syst 64:181–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takimoto A, Nair PKR, Alavalapati JRR (2008a) Socioeconomic potential of carbon sequestration through agroforestry in the West African Sahel. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Chang 13:745–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takimoto A, Nair PKR, Nair VD (2008b) Carbon stock and sequestration potential of traditional and improved agroforestry systems in the West African Sahel. Agric Ecosyst Environ 125:159–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Takimoto A, Nair VD, Nair PKR (2009) Contribution of trees to soil carbon sequestration under agroforestry systems in the West African Sahel. Agrofor Syst 76:11–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Noordwijk M, Hoang MH, Neufeldt H, Öborn I, Yatich T (2011) How trees and people can co-adapt to climate change: reducing vulnerability through multifunctional agroforestry landscapes. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Verchot LV, van Noordwijk M, Kandji S, Tomich TP, Ong CK, Albrecht (2007) Climate change: linking adaptation and mitigation through agroforestry. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Chang 12: 901–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Victoria R, Banwart S, Black H, Ingram J, Joosten H, Milne E, Noellemeyer E (2012) The benefits of soil carbon: managing soils for multiple economic, societal and environmental benefits. UNEP Year Book 2012:19–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Viswanath S, Peddappaiah RS, Subramoniam V, Manivachakam P, George M (2004) Management of Casuarina equisetifolia in wide-row intercropping systems for enhanced productivity. Ind J Agrofor 6(2):19–25

    Google Scholar 

  • von Lutzow M, Kogel-Knabner I, Ekschmitt K, Matzner E, Guggenberger G, Marschner B, Flessa H (2006) Stabilization of organic matter in temperate soils: mechanisms and their relevance under different soil conditions a review. Eur J Soil Sci 57:426–445

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallander H, Goransson H, Rosengren U (2004) Production, standing biomass and natural abundance of 15N and 13C in ectomycorrhizal mycelia collected at different soil depths in two forest types. Oecologia 139:89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Hsieh YP (2002) Uncertainties and novel prospects in the study of the soil carbon dynamics. Chemosphere 49:791–804

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ICAR-Natural Resource Management Division, ICAR, New Delhi, India

    S. K. Dhyani

  2. ICAR-Central Agroforestry Research Institute, Jhansi, India

    Asha Ram, Ram Newaj, A. K. Handa & Inder Dev

Authors
  1. S. K. Dhyani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Asha Ram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ram Newaj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. K. Handa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Inder Dev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, Delhi, India

    Probir K. Ghosh

  2. Plant Animal Relationship Division, IGFRI, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India

    Sanat Kumar Mahanta

  3. ICAR, Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India

    Debashis Mandal

  4. Agricultural Chemistry & Soil Science, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, West Bengal, India

    Biswapati Mandal

  5. Crop Production Division, Indian Grassland & Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India

    Srinivasan Ramakrishnan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dhyani, S.K., Ram, A., Newaj, R., Handa, A.K., Dev, I. (2020). Agroforestry for Carbon Sequestration in Tropical India. In: Ghosh, P., Mahanta, S., Mandal, D., Mandal, B., Ramakrishnan, S. (eds) Carbon Management in Tropical and Sub-Tropical Terrestrial Systems. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9628-1_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation