Skip to main content

Deepening Reflection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 514 Accesses

Part of the book series: Understanding Teaching-Learning Practice ((UTLP))

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the range of reflective practices that can be mediated or enhanced with mobile technology. We discuss the purpose, process and content of reflection and reflective practice as well as the role of reflecting on practice in workplace learning (WPL). We emphasise the importance of helping students understand reflection as a continuous activity associated with action and the improvement of practice. We propose concrete examples of technology-enhanced structured and scaffolded reflective activities for WPL. These activities offer ways of creating and seizing opportunities for reflection while on placement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2009). Realising the educational worth of integrating work experiences in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 34(7), 827–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaschke, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 56–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. D. (2012). Teaching for critical thinking: Tools and techniques to help students question their assumptions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D. (2001). Using journal writing to enhance reflective practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 90, 9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (2013). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (2006). The mind map book. Harlow, UK: BBC Active.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process (Revised ed.). Boston: D. C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, L. E., Litchfield, A., Lawrence, E., Raban, R., & Leijdekkers, P. (2009). Advancing the m-learning research agenda for active, experiential learning: Four case studies. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), 250–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferns, S., & Comfort, J. U. (2014). ePortfolios as evidence of standards and outcomes in work-integrated learning. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 15(3), 269–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1973). Education for critical consciousness. New York: Seabury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2014). A rich seam: How new pedagogies find deep learning. London: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartnell-Young, E., Harrison, C., Crook, C., Pemberton, R., Joyes, G., Fisher, T., & Davies, L. (2007). The impact of e-portfolios on learning. Coventry, UK: Becta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, M., Coulson, D., & McMaugh, A. (2016). Towards a theory of the ecology of reflection: Reflective practice for experiential learning in higher education. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 13(2), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrington, J., Herrington, A., Mantei, J., Olney, I., & Ferry, B. (2009). Using mobile technologies to develop new ways of teaching and learning. In J. Herrington, A. Herrington, J. Mantei, I. Olney, & B. Ferry (Eds.), New technologies, new pedagogies: Mobile learning in higher education. Wollongong: Faculty of Education, University of Wollongong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, P. (1995). Adult and continuing education: Theory and practice, (2nd edition). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kampylis, P., Punie, Y., & Devine, J. (2015). Promoting effective digital-age learning: A European framework for digitally-competent educational organisations. https://doi.org/10.2791/54070.

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine, L., Weston, C., Beauchamp, C., Wiseman, C., & Beauchamp, J. (1999). Building a metacognitive model of reflection. Higher Education, 37(2), 105–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane, B., & Gourlay, L. (2009). The reflection game: Enacting the penitent self. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(4), 455–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markauskaite, L., & Goodyear, P. (2017). Epistemic fluency and professional education: Innovation, knowledgeable action and actionable knowledge. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, F., & Ertzberger, J. (2015). Effects of reflection type in the here and now mobile learning environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47, 932–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OALD. (2016). Reflection. Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com.

  • Quinton, S., & Smallbone, T. (2010). Feeding forward: Using feedback to promote student reflection and learning–A teaching model. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(1), 125–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J., Kaider, F., Henschke, K., & Jackling, B. (2009). A framework for assessing work integrated learning. Paper presented at the 32nd HERDSA Annual Conference, Darwin, NT. http://vuir.vu.edu.au/6857/.

  • Riel, M. (1993). Global education through learning circles. In L. M. Harasim (Ed.), Global networks: Computers and international communication (pp. 221–236). Cambridge, US: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M., & Ryan, M. (2013). Theorising a model for teaching and assessing reflective learning in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, 32(2), 244–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1996). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Hampshire, UK: Arena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35, 601–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strandell-Laine, C., Stolt, M., Leino-Kilpi, H., & Saarikoski, M. (2015). Use of mobile devices in nursing student–nurse teacher cooperation during the clinical practicum: An integrative review. Nurse Education Today, 35(3), 493–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. D., Dearnley, C. A., Laxton, J. C., Coates, C. A., Treasure‐Jones, T., Campbell, R., & Hall, I. (2010). Developing a mobile learning solution for health and social care practice. Distance Education, 31(2), 175–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trede, F., & McEwen, C. (2012). Developing a critical professional identity. In J. Higgs, R. Barnett, S. Billett, M. Hutchings, & F. Trede (Eds.), Practice-based education: Perspectives and strategies (3rd ed., pp. 27–40). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trede, F., & McEwen, C. (2015). Critical thinking for future practice: Learning to question. In M. Davies & R. Barnett (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education (pp. 457–474). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trede, F., & McEwen, C. (2016). Carving out the territory for educating the deliberate professional. In F. Trede & McEwen, C. (Eds.), Educating the deliberate professional: Preparing for future practices (pp. 15–28). Dodrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trede, F., & Smith, M. (2012). Teaching reflective practice in practice settings: Students’ perceptions of their clinical educators. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(5), 615–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Boom, G., Paas, F., Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Van Gog, T. (2004). Reflection prompts and tutor feedback in a web-based learning environment: Effects on students’ self-regulated learning competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(4), 551–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wishart, J. (2009). Ethical considerations in implementing mobile learning in the workplace. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 1(2), 76–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zegwaard, K. E. (2015). Innovation in work integrated learning: Working towards our future. Paper presented at the Think Tank, Adelaide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franziska Trede .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Trede, F., Markauskaite, L., McEwen, C., Macfarlane, S. (2019). Deepening Reflection. In: Education for Practice in a Hybrid Space. Understanding Teaching-Learning Practice. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7410-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7410-4_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7409-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7410-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics