Abstract
In conclusion, this monograph contributes to three important issues in artificial grammar learning. First, phonological studies using an artificial grammar paradigm are an area of increasing research interest. However, testing is most often done with English speakers in this kind of research. This study expends populations to Taiwan Southern Min and Quebec French. Second, artificial grammar studies often draw conclusion from pooled data, without taking into account individual learning strategies. This research carefully examines the individual learner’s performance and categorizes participants into different learner types. These tell us more about the relationship between learnability and phonological patterning and help us rule out a possibility of pure familiarity effect. Finally, this research lays out design limitations in artificial grammar learning experiments and presents ways to refine the design, providing a guide for linguists to improve the design.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
One interpretation for the failure of [continuant] to play a role in these experiments can be given within the Contrastive Hierarchy hypothesis (Dresher 2009), namely that the feature [sonorant] has scope over the feature [continuant].
- 2.
Seidl and Buckley (2005) tested 8.5–9.5-month-olds infants, showing that infants can learn an arbitrary (non-phonologically-grounded) pattern. This research focuses on adult findings and does not present infant studies in detail in this section (see discussion about infants and adults in artificial grammar learning in Sect. 3.2.3).
References
Chang, Yung-Hsiang Shawn. 2008. An acoustic and perceptual study of vowel nasality in Taiwanese. USTWPL 4: 17–26. Urbana-Champaign: Department of Linguistics University of Illinois.
Desmeules-Trudel, Félix. (2015). Propriétés aérodynamiques et comparaison des voyelles nasales et potentiellement nasalisées en français québécois. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Linguistic Association.
Dresher, Elan B. 2009. The contrastive hierarchy in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ettlinger, Marc, Kara Morgan-Short, Mandy Faretta-Stutenberg, and Patrick C. M. Wong. 2015. The relationship between artificial and second language learning. Cognitive Science, 1–26.
Finley, Sara. 2011. The privileged status of locality in consonant harmony. Journal of Memory and Language 65: 74–83.
Gómez, Rebecca L., Richard R. Bootzin, and Lynn Nadel. 2006. Naps promote abstraction in language-learning infants. Psychological Science 17 (8): 670–674.
Moreton, Elliott. 2008. Analytic bias and phonological typology. Phonology 25 (1): 83–127.
Moreton, Elliott, and Joe Pater. 2012a. Structure and substance in artificial-phonology learning, Part I: Structure. Language and Linguistics Compact, 686–701.
Moreton, Elliott, and Joe Pater. 2012b. Structure and substance in artificial-phonology learning, Part I: Substance. Language and Linguistics Compact, 702–718.
Morgan-Short, Kara, Mandy Faretta-Stutenberg, Katherine Brill-Schuetz, Helen Carpenter, and Patrick C.M. Wong. 2014. Declarative and procedural memory as individual differences in second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17 (1): 56–72.
Nevins, Andrew. 2010. Two case studies in phonological universals: A view from artificial grammars. Biolinguistics 4: 217–232.
Peperkamp, Sharon, and Alexander Martin. 2016. Sleep-dependent consolidation in the learning of natural vs. unnatural phonological rules. In The 15th Conference on Laboratory Phonology (LabPhon15), July 13–1, 2016, Cornell University.
Seidl, Amanda, and Eugene Buckley. 2005. On the learning of arbitrary phonological rules. Language Learning and Development 1 (3 & 4): 289–316.
St. Clair, Michelle C., and Padraic Monaghan. 2008. Language abstraction: Consolidation of language structure during sleep. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, ed. Bradley C. Love, Kateri McRae, and Vladimir M. Sloutsky, 727–732. Austin Texas: Cognitive Science Society.
Wagner, Ullrich, Stephen Gais, Hlide Haider, Rolf Verleger, and Jan Born. 2004. Sleep inspires insight. Nature 427: 352–355.
Walker, Douglas C. 1984. The pronunciation of Canadian French. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
Wilson, Colin. 2006. Learning phonology with substantive bias: An experimental and computational study of velar palatalization. Cognitive Science 30: 945–982.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Peking University Press and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lin, YL. (2019). Conclusions. In: Substantive Bias and Natural Classes. Frontiers in Chinese Linguistics, vol 8. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3534-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3534-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3533-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3534-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)