Skip to main content

Conclusions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Substantive Bias and Natural Classes

Part of the book series: Frontiers in Chinese Linguistics ((FiCL,volume 8))

  • 116 Accesses

Abstract

In conclusion, this monograph contributes to three important issues in artificial grammar learning. First, phonological studies using an artificial grammar paradigm are an area of increasing research interest. However, testing is most often done with English speakers in this kind of research. This study expends populations to Taiwan Southern Min and Quebec French. Second, artificial grammar studies often draw conclusion from pooled data, without taking into account individual learning strategies. This research carefully examines the individual learner’s performance and categorizes participants into different learner types. These tell us more about the relationship between learnability and phonological patterning and help us rule out a possibility of pure familiarity effect. Finally, this research lays out design limitations in artificial grammar learning experiments and presents ways to refine the design, providing a guide for linguists to improve the design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    One interpretation for the failure of [continuant] to play a role in these experiments can be given within the Contrastive Hierarchy hypothesis (Dresher 2009), namely that the feature [sonorant] has scope over the feature [continuant].

  2. 2.

    Seidl and Buckley (2005) tested 8.5–9.5-month-olds infants, showing that infants can learn an arbitrary (non-phonologically-grounded) pattern. This research focuses on adult findings and does not present infant studies in detail in this section (see discussion about infants and adults in artificial grammar learning in Sect. 3.2.3).

References

  • Chang, Yung-Hsiang Shawn. 2008. An acoustic and perceptual study of vowel nasality in Taiwanese. USTWPL 4: 17–26. Urbana-Champaign: Department of Linguistics University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmeules-Trudel, Félix. (2015). Propriétés aérodynamiques et comparaison des voyelles nasales et potentiellement nasalisées en français québécois. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Linguistic Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dresher, Elan B. 2009. The contrastive hierarchy in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ettlinger, Marc, Kara Morgan-Short, Mandy Faretta-Stutenberg, and Patrick C. M. Wong. 2015. The relationship between artificial and second language learning. Cognitive Science, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finley, Sara. 2011. The privileged status of locality in consonant harmony. Journal of Memory and Language 65: 74–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, Rebecca L., Richard R. Bootzin, and Lynn Nadel. 2006. Naps promote abstraction in language-learning infants. Psychological Science 17 (8): 670–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreton, Elliott. 2008. Analytic bias and phonological typology. Phonology 25 (1): 83–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreton, Elliott, and Joe Pater. 2012a. Structure and substance in artificial-phonology learning, Part I: Structure. Language and Linguistics Compact, 686–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreton, Elliott, and Joe Pater. 2012b. Structure and substance in artificial-phonology learning, Part I: Substance. Language and Linguistics Compact, 702–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan-Short, Kara, Mandy Faretta-Stutenberg, Katherine Brill-Schuetz, Helen Carpenter, and Patrick C.M. Wong. 2014. Declarative and procedural memory as individual differences in second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17 (1): 56–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevins, Andrew. 2010. Two case studies in phonological universals: A view from artificial grammars. Biolinguistics 4: 217–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peperkamp, Sharon, and Alexander Martin. 2016. Sleep-dependent consolidation in the learning of natural vs. unnatural phonological rules. In The 15th Conference on Laboratory Phonology (LabPhon15), July 13–1, 2016, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidl, Amanda, and Eugene Buckley. 2005. On the learning of arbitrary phonological rules. Language Learning and Development 1 (3 & 4): 289–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St. Clair, Michelle C., and Padraic Monaghan. 2008. Language abstraction: Consolidation of language structure during sleep. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, ed. Bradley C. Love, Kateri McRae, and Vladimir M. Sloutsky, 727–732. Austin Texas: Cognitive Science Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Ullrich, Stephen Gais, Hlide Haider, Rolf Verleger, and Jan Born. 2004. Sleep inspires insight. Nature 427: 352–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Douglas C. 1984. The pronunciation of Canadian French. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Colin. 2006. Learning phonology with substantive bias: An experimental and computational study of velar palatalization. Cognitive Science 30: 945–982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-Leng Lin .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Peking University Press and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lin, YL. (2019). Conclusions. In: Substantive Bias and Natural Classes. Frontiers in Chinese Linguistics, vol 8. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3534-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3534-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3533-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3534-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics