Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

Cloud Microphysics Across Scales for Weather and Climate

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Current Trends in the Representation of Physical Processes in Weather and Climate Models

Part of the book series: Springer Atmospheric Sciences ((SPRINGERATMO))

Abstract

Cloud microphysics describes the evolution of condensed water in the atmosphere and is critical for weather and climate. This chapter describes the methods used for representing microphysical processes in weather and climate models, from explicit bin schemes used for small-scale simulation up to bulk treatments often used in global models. Of particular importance is how the cloud microphysical treatments are coupled to the rest of the cloud schemes in a numerical model that includes clouds. The key issues include the presentation of sub-grid inhomogeneity in humidity and dynamics. In addition, treatment of cold clouds in a “mixed phase” where liquid and ice may co-exist is important. We discuss current approaches including more comprehensive representations of ice and snow, treatment of rimed ice (graupel or hail), and coupling to unified turbulence schemes. Finally, we discuss possible paths forward for simulating cloud microphysics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bogenschutz, P.A., A. Gettelman, H. Morrison, V.E. Larson, C. Craig, and D.P. Schanen. 2013. Higher-order turbulence closure and its impact on climate simulation in the community atmosphere model. Journal of Climate 26 (23): 9655–9676. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00075.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogenschutz, P.A., A. Gettelman, C. Hannay, V.E. Larson, R.B. Neale, C. Craig, and C.-C. Chen. 2018. The path to CAM6: Coupled simulations with CAM5.4 and CAM5.5. Geoscientific Model Development 11 (1): 235–255. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-235-2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eidhammer, Trude, Hugh Morrison, David Mitchell, Andrew Gettelman, and Ehsan Erfani. 2016. Improvements in global climate model microphysics using a consistent representation of ice particle properties. Journal of Climate 30 (2): 609–629. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0050.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gettelman, A., and H. Morrison. 2015. Advanced two-moment bulk microphysics for global models. Part I: Off-line tests and comparison with other schemes. Journal of Climate 28 (3): 1268–1287. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00102.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gettelman, A., X. Liu, S.J. Ghan, H. Morrison, S. Park, A.J. Conley, S.A. Klein, J. Boyle, D.L. Mitchell, and J.-L. F. Li. 2010. Global simulations of ice nucleation and ice supersaturation with an improved cloud scheme in the community atmosphere model. Journal of Geophysical Research 115 (D18216). https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013797.

  • Gettelman, A., H. Morrison, S. Santos, P. Bogenschutz, and P.M. Caldwell. 2015. Advanced two-moment bulk microphysics for global models. Part II: Global model solutions and aerosol-cloud interactions. Journal of Climate 28 (3): 1288–1307. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00103.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golaz, J.-C., V.E. Larson, and W.R. Cotton. 2002. A PDF-based model for boundary layer clouds. Part I: Method and model description. JAS 59: 3540–3551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashino, T., and G.J. Tripoli. 2007. The spectral ice habit prediction system (SHIPS). Part I: Model description and simulation of the vapor deposition process. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64: 2210–2237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Song-You, and Jeong-Ock Jade Lim. 2006. The WRF single-moment 6-class microphysics scheme (WSM6). Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences. http://www.dbpia.co.kr.

  • Hoose, C., and O. Möhler. 2012. Heterogeneous ice nucleation on atmospheric aerosols: A review of results from laboratory experiments. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 12 (20): 9817–9854. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, Edwin. 1969. On the distribution and continuity of water substance in atmospheric circulations. In On the Distribution and Continuity of Water Substance in Atmospheric Circulations. Edited by Edwin Kessler, 1–84. Meteorological Monographs. Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-935704-36-2_1.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Khain, A., A. Pokrovsky, M. Pinsky, A. Seifert, and V. Phillips. 2004. Simulation of effects of atmospheric aerosols on deep turbulent convective clouds using a spectral microphysics mixed-phase cumulus cloud model. Part I: Model description and possible applications. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 61 (24): 2963–82. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-3350.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khain, A.P., K.D. Beheng, A. Heymsfield, A. Korolev, S.O. Krichak, Z. Levin, M. Pinsky, et al. 2015. Representation of microphysical processes in cloud-resolving models: Spectral (bin) microphysics versus bulk parameterization. Reviews of Geophysics 2014RG000468. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khairoutdinov, M.F., and Y. Kogan. 2000. A new cloud physics parameterization in a large-Eddy simulation model of marine stratocumulus. Monthly Weather Review 128: 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, Yefim. 2013. A cumulus cloud microphysics parameterization for cloud-resolving models. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 70 (5): 1423–1436. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0183.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korolev, Alexei. 2007. Limitations of the Wegener–Bergeron–Findeisen mechanism in the evolution of mixed-phase clouds. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 64 (9): 3372–3375. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS4035.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korolev, Alexei V., George A. Isaac, Stewart G. Cober, J. Walter Strapp, and John Hallett. 2003. Microphysical characterization of mixed-phase clouds. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 129 (587): 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.01.204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebsock, Matthew, Hugh Morrison, and Andrew Gettelman. 2013. Microphysical implications of cloud-precipitation covariance derived from satellite remote sensing. JGR 118 (12): 6521–6533. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y.-L., R.D. Farley, and H.D. Orville. 1983. Bulk parameterization of the snow field in a cloud model. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 22: 1065–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, U., and E. Roeckner. 1996. Design and performance of a new cloud microphysics scheme developed for the ECHAM general circulation model. Climate Dynamics 12: 557–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, U., J. Feichter, C.C. Chuang, and J.E. Penner. 1999. Prediction of the number of cloud droplets in the ECHAM GCM. Journal Geophysical Research 104: 9169–9198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, U., P. Stier, C. Hoose, S. Ferrachat, E. Roeckner, and J. Zhang. 2007. Cloud microphysics and aerosol indirect effects in the global climate Model ECHAM5-HAM. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 7 (2): 3245–3446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milbrandt, J.A., and M.K. Yau. 2005. A multimoment bulk microphysics parameterization. Part I: Analysis of the role of the spectral shape parameter. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 62 (9): 3051–3064. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3534.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milbrandt, J.A., S. Belair, M. Faucher, M. Vallee, M.L. Carrera, and A. Glazer. 2016. The pan-Canadian high resolution (2.5 km) deterministic prediction system. Weather and Forecasting 31: 1791–1816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, H., and A. Gettelman. 2008. A new two-moment bulk stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in the NCAR community atmosphere model (CAM3), Part I: Description and numerical tests. Journal of Climate 21 (15): 3642–3659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, Hugh, and Jason A. Milbrandt. 2015. Parameterization of cloud microphysics based on the prediction of bulk ice particle properties. Part I: Scheme description and idealized tests. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 72 (1): 287–311. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-14-0065.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, H., J.A. Curry, and V.I. Khvorostyanov. 2005. A new double-moment microphysics parameterization for application in cloud and climate models. Part I: Description. JAS 62: 1665–1677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, Hugh, Renata B. McCoy, Stephen A. Klein, Shaocheng Xie, Yali Luo, Alexander Avramov, Mingxuan Chen, et al. 2009. Intercomparison of model simulations of mixed-phase clouds observed during the ARM mixed-phase arctic cloud experiment. II: Multilayer cloud. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 135 (641): 1003–1019. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neale, Richard B., C.C. Chen, A. Gettelman, P.H. Lauritzen, S. Park, D.L. Williamson, A.J. Conley, et al. 2010. Description of the NCAR community atmosphere model (CAM5.0). Boulder, CO, USA: National Center for Atmospheric Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ose, T. 1993. An examination of the effects of explicit cloud water in the UCLA GCM. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan 71: 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, P.J., and J.E. Kristjansson. 1998. A comparison of CCM3 model climate using diagnosed and predicted condensate parameterizations. JOC 11: 1587–1614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotstayn, L.D., B.F. Ryan, and J.J. Katzfey. 2000. A scheme for calculation of the liquid fraction in mixed-phase stratiform clouds in large-scale models. MWR 128 (4): 1070–1088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge, S.A., and P.V. Hobbs. 1984. The mesoscale and microscale structure and organization of clouds and precipitation in midlatitude cyclones. XII: A diagnostic modeling study of precipitation development in narrow cold-frontal rainbands. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 41: 2949–2972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, A., and K.D. Beheng. 2001. A double-moment parameterization for simulating autoconversion, accretion, and self-collection. Atmospheric Research 59–60: 265–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shima, S., K. Kusano, A. Kawano, T. Sugiyama, and S. Kawahara. 2009. The super-droplet method for the numerical simulation of clouds and precipitation: A particle-based and probabilistic microphysics model coupled with a non-hydrostatic model. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 135 (642): 1307–1320. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipway, B.J., and A.A. Hill. 2012. Diagnosis of systematic differences between multiple parametrizations of warm rain microphysics using a kinematic framework. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 138 (669): 2196–2211. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.1913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slingo, A. (ed.). 1985. Handbook of the meteorological office 11-layer atmospheric general circulation model. Rep. DCTN, 29, Meteorol. Pff., Bracknell, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, X., and G.J. Zhang. 2011. Microphysics parameterization for convective clouds in a global climate model: Description and single column model tests. JGR 116 (D02201). https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014833.

  • Song, X., G.J. Zhang, and J.L.F. Li. 2012. Evaluation of Microphysics Parameterization for Convective Clouds in the NCAR Community Atmosphere Mode CAM5. J. Climate 25, no. 24 (2012): 8568–8590. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00563.

  • Stier, P., and others. 2005. The aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 5: 1125–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer-Calder, K., A. Gettelman, C. Craig, S. Goldhaber, P.A. Bogenschutz, C.-C. Chen, H. Morrison, et al. 2015. A unified parameterization of clouds and turbulence using CLUBB and subcolumns in the community atmosphere model. Geoscientific Model Development 8 (12): 3801–3821. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3801-2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Gregory, and Trude Eidhammer. 2014. A study of aerosol impacts on clouds and precipitation development in a large winter cyclone. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 71 (10): 3636–3658. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-0305.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Gregory, Paul R. Field, Roy M. Rasmussen, and William D. Hall. 2008. Explicit forecasts of winter precipitation using an improved bulk microphysics scheme. Part II: Implementation of a new snow parameterization. Monthly Weather Review 136 (12): 5095–5115. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2387.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherald, R.T., and S. Manabe. 1988. Cloud feedback processes in a general circulation model. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 45: 1397–1415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. 2005. Drizzle in stratiform boundary layer clouds. Part II: Microphysical aspects. JAS 62 (9): 3034–3050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D.R., and S.P. Ballard. 1999. A Microphysically Based Precipitation Scheme for the UK Meteorological Office Unified Model. Qjrms 125: 1607–1636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Junhua, Ulrike Lohmann, and Philip Stier. 2005. A microphysical parameterization for convective clouds in the ECHAM5 climate model: Single-column model results evaluated at the Oklahoma atmospheric radiation measurement program site. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 110 (D15): D15S07. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005128.

  • Zhao, Q., T.L. Black, and M.E. Baldwin. 1997. Implementation of the cloud prediction scheme in the Eta model at NCEP. Weather and Forecasting 12: 697–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), 3090 Center Green Dr., Boulder, CO, 80301, USA

    Andrew Gettelman, Hugh Morrison & Greg Thompson

Authors
  1. Andrew Gettelman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hugh Morrison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Greg Thompson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Gettelman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA

    David A. Randall

  2. Centre for Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

    J. Srinivasan

  3. Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Pune, Maharashtra, India

    Ravi S. Nanjundiah

  4. Centre for Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

    Parthasarathi Mukhopadhyay

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gettelman, A., Morrison, H., Thompson, G. (2019). Cloud Microphysics Across Scales for Weather and Climate. In: Randall, D., Srinivasan, J., Nanjundiah, R., Mukhopadhyay, . (eds) Current Trends in the Representation of Physical Processes in Weather and Climate Models. Springer Atmospheric Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3396-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation