Abstract
Current trends in technology-enhanced learning highlight the increasing importance of mobile digital tools in learning scenarios; seamless learning, or learning that spans contexts and activities within and without the classroom, is becoming mainstream. Despite the growing body of the literature in this area, this chapter highlights a general focus on technological issues and perspectives and a lack of theoretically driven discussion. We argue that theoretically/conceptually inspired literature reviews covering pedagogy and cognitive aspects of learning are currently needed to establish a grounded framework for future research in this area. This paper contributes one such analysis—it proposes and reflects on the issues raised when considering seamless learning from the perspective of the established literature on external representations (ERs), a core concept in distributed or embodied accounts of cognition. Core issues we discuss are: (a) what are the challenges facing seamless learning from an ERs perspective? (b) how can knowledge about ERs be applied to seamless learning systems?, and (c) what methodological challenges will emerge if seamless learning systems are studied from the perspective of ERs? This discussion is intended as a bridge between practical and applied work in seamless learning and theoretical or laboratory-based work in ERs—it seeks to drive the field of seamless learning forward by highlighting best practices from an established theoretical perspective. By elaborating on a theoretically grounded lens, we seek to empower researchers to identify promising approaches for the design and evaluation of next-generation high impact seamless learning solutions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ainsworth, S. (1999a). A functional taxonomy of multiple representations. Computers & Education, 33(2–3), 131–152.
Ainsworth, S. (1999b). Designing effective multi-representational learning systems. Nottingham: Centre for Research in Development, Instruction and Training, School of Psychology, University of Nottingham.
Ainsworth, S., & VanLabeke, N. (2004). Multiple forms of dynamic representation. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 241–255.
Ainsworth, S., Bibby, P. A., & Wood, D. (1998). Analysing the costs and benefits of multi-representational learning environments. In M. W. van Someren, P. Reimann, H. P. A. Boshuizen, & T. de Jon (Eds.), Learning with multiple representations (pp. 120–136). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1–11.
Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3), 215–241.
Blackwell, A. F., Whitley, K. N., Good, J., & Petre, M. (2001). Cognitive factors in programming with diagrams. Artificial Intelligence Review, 95, 95–114.
Bodemer, D., Ploetzner, R., Feuerlein, I., & Spada, H. (2004). The active integration of information during learning with dynamic and interactive visualisations. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 341.
Boucheix, J.-M., Lowe, R. K., Putri, D. K., & Groff, J. (2013). Cueing animations: Dynamic signaling aids information extraction and comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 25(C), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.11.005.
Burigat, S., Chittaro, L., & Parlato, E. (2008). Map, diagram, and web page navigation on mobile devices: The effectiveness of zoomable user interfaces with overviews. Presented at the Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (pp. 147–156). ACM.
Byrne, M. D., Catrambone, R., & Stasko, J. T. (1999). Evaluating animations as student aids in learning computer algorithms. Computers & Education, 33(4), 253–278.
Chan, T.-W., Roschelle, J., Hsi, S., Kinshuk, K., Sharples, M., Brown, T., … Milrad, M. (2006). One-to-one technology-enhanced learning: An opportunity for global research collaboration. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793206806000032.
Cheng, P. C. H. (1998). Law encoding diagrams as support for science learning. Z. Padagog. Psychol., 12(2–3), 100–111.
Chittaro, L. (2006). Visualizing information on mobile devices. Computer, 39(3), 40–45.
Cox, R. (1999). Representation construction, externalised cognition and individual differences. Learning and Instruction, 9(4), 343–363.
Cox, R., & Brna, P. (1994). Analytical reasoning with external representations: Supporting the stages of selection, construction and use. University of Edinburgh Department of Artificial Intelligence.
de Vries, E. (2006). Students’ construction of external representations in design-based learning situations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 213–227.
de Jong, T., Ainsworth, S., Dobson, M., van der Hulst, A., Levonen, J., Reimann, P., … Swaak, J. (1998). Acquiring knowledge in science and mathematics: The use of multiple representations in technology-based learning environments. In M. W. Van Someren, P. Reimann, H. P. A. Boshuizen, & T. de Jong (Eds.), Learning with multiple representations. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Dillenbourg, P., & Betrancourt, M. (2006). Collaborative load. In J. Elen & R. E. Clark (Eds.), Handling complexity in learning environments: Theory and research. Oxford, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Knowledge convergence in computer-supported collaborative learning: The role of external representations tools. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(3), 405–441.
Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., Gräsel, C., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction, 12(2), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00005-6.
Frohberg, D., Göth, C., & Schwabe, G. (2009). Mobile Learning projects—A critical analysis of the state of the art. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 25(4), 307–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00315.x.
Greenberg, S., Marquardt, N., Ballendat, T., Diaz-Marino, R., & Wang, M. (2011). Proxemic interactions: The new ubicomp? Interactions, 18(1), 42–50.
Harrison, S., & Dourish, P. (1996). Re-place-ing space: The roles of place and space in collaborative systems. In Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 67–76). Boston, MA, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/240080.240193.
Hegarty, M. (2004). Dynamic visualizations and learning: Getting to the difficult questions. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 343–351.
Hegarty, M., & Steinhoff, K. (1997). Individual differences in use of diagrams as external memory in mechanical reasoning. Learning and Individual Differences, 9(1), 19–42.
Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2002). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Human-computer interaction in the new millenium (pp. 75–94). New York: ACM Press.
Hornecker, E., & Buur, J. (2006). Getting a grip on tangible interaction: A framework on physical space and social interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 437–446). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124838.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Bradford: MIT Press.
Hwang, G., & Tsai, C. (2011). Research trends in mobile and ubiquitous learning: A review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), E65–E70.
Ishii, H., & Ullmer, B. (1997). Tangible bits: Towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. Presented at the Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 234–241). ACM.
José, R., Otero, N., Izadi, S., & Harper, R. (2008). Instant places: Using bluetooth for situated interaction in public displays. Pervasive Computing, IEEE, 7(4), 52–57.
Kim, B., & Reeves, T. C. (2007). Reframing research on learning with technology: In search of the meaning of cognitive tools. Instructional Science, 35(3), 207–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006-9005-2.
Kirsh, D. (2010). Thinking with external representations. AI & Society, 25(4), 441–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-010-0272-8.
Kohen-Vacs, D., & Ronen, M. (2015). Fragmented yet seamless: System integration for supporting cross-context CSCL scripts. In L.-H Wong, M. Milrad & M. Specht (Eds.), Seamless learning in the age of mobile connectivity (pp. 439–452). Singapore: Springer.
Kozma, R. (2003). The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 205–226.
Larkin, J., & Simon, H. (1987). Why a diagram (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65–99.
Laru, J., Näykki, P., & Järvelä, S. (2015). Four stages of research on the educational use of ubiquitous computing. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 8(1), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2014.2360862.
Looi, C.-K., Seow, P., Zhang, B., So, H.-J., Chen, W., & Wong, L.-H. (2009). Leveraging mobile technology for sustainable seamless learning: A research agenda. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 154–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00912.x.
Lowe, R. K. (1996). Background knowledge and the construction of a situational representation from a diagram. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 11(4), 377–397.
Lowe, R. K. (2003). Animation and learning: Selective processing of information in dynamic graphics. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 157–176.
Lucke, U., & Rensing, C. (2014). A survey on pervasive education. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 14(Suppl. C), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2013.12.001.
Marshall, P. (2007). Do tangible interfaces enhance learning? In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (pp. 163–170). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1226969.1227004.
Otero, N., Rogers, Y., & Du Boulay, B. (2001). Is interactivity a good thing? Assessing its benefits for learning. In M. Smith & G. Salvendy (Eds.), Systems, social and internationalization design aspects of human-computer interaction (pp. 790–794). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Otero, N., Müller, M., Alissandrakis, A., & Milrad, M. (2013). Exploring video-based interactions around digital public displays to foster curiosity about science in schools. Presented at the Proceedings of ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (pp. 4–5).
Otero, N., Milrad, M., Rogers, Y., Santos, A. J., Veríssimo, M., & Torres, N. (2011). Challenges in designing seamless learning scenarios: Affective and emotional effects on external representations. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 5(1), 15–27.
Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations a dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Palmer, S. E. (1977). Fundamental aspects of cognitive representation. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Perry, M. (2003). Distributed cognition. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), HCI models, theories, and frameworks: Toward a multidisciplinary science (pp. 193–223), San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
Rogers, Y., & Price, S. (2009). How mobile technologies are changing the way children learn. In A. Druin (Ed.), Mobile technology for children (pp. 3–22). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Rogers, Y., & Rodden, T. (2003). Configuring spaces and surfaces to support collaborative interactions. In Public and situated displays (pp. 45–79). Dordrecht: Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-017-2813-3_3.
Rogers, Y., & Scaife, M. (1998). How can interactive multimedia facilitate learning? In J. Lee (Ed.), Intelligence and multimodality in multimedia interfaces: Research applications. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
Rossitto, C., & Eklundh, K. S. (2007). Managing work at several places: A case of project work in a nomadic group of students. In Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics: Invent! Explore! (pp. 45–51). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1362550.1362562.
Salomon, G. (1993a). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Salomon, G. (1993b). No distribution without individuals’ cognition: A dynamical interactional view. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 111–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sawyer, R. K., & Greeno, J. G. (2009). Situativity and learning. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 347–367). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scaife, M., & Rogers, Y. (1996). External cognition: How do graphical representations work? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45(2), 185–213.
Sharples, M., Arnedillo-Sánchez, I., Milrad, M., & Vavoula, G. (2009). Mobile learning. In Technology-enhanced learning (pp. 233–249). Dordrecht: Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4020-9827-7_14.
Sharples, M., Milrad, M., Arnedillo-Sanchez, I., & Vavoula, G. (2009b). Mobile learning: Small devices, big issues. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong, A. Lazonder, & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology enhanced learning: Principles and products (pp. 233–249). Berlin: Springer.
Sollervall, H., Otero, N., Milrad, M., Johansson, D., & Vogel, B. (2012). Outdoor activities for the learning of mathematics: Designing with mobile technologies for transitions across learning contexts. In 2012 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technology in Education (WMUTE) (pp. 33–40). IEEE.
Spikol, D., & Milrad, M. (2008). Physical activities and playful learning using mobile games. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(3), 275–295.
Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Liu, T.-C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94(Suppl. C), 252–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008.
Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296.
Terrenghi, L., Quigley, A., & Dix, A. (2009). A taxonomy for and analysis of multi-person-display ecosystems. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 13(8), 583.
Vavoula, G., & Sharples, M. (2009). Meeting the challenges in evaluating mobile learning: A 3-level evaluation framework. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 1(2), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.4018/jmbl.2009040104.
White, T., & Pea, R. (2011). Distributed by design: On the promises and pitfalls of collaborative learning with multiple representations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(3), 489–547.
Wong, L.-H. (2015). A brief history of mobile seamless learning. In Seamless learning in the age of mobile connectivity (pp. 3–40). Singapore: Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-287-113-8_1.
Wong, L.-H., & Looi, C.-K. (2011). What seams do we remove in mobile-assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2364–2381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.007.
Wu, W.-H., Jim Wu, Y.-C., Chen, C.-Y., Kao, H.-Y., Lin, C.-H., & Huang, S.-H. (2012). Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 59(2), 817–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.016.
Wu, W.-H., Wu, Y.-C. J., Chen, C.-Y., Kao, H.-Y., Lin, C.-H., & Huang, S.-H. (2012). Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 59(2), 817–827.
Zhang, J. J. (1997). The nature of external representations in problem solving. Cognitive Science, 21(2), 179–217.
Zhang, J. J., & Norman, D. A. (1994). Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 18(1), 87–122.
Zhang, J., & Patel, V. L. (2006). Distributed cognition, representation, and affordance. Cognition and Pragmatics, 14(2), 333–341.
Zydney, J. M., & Warner, Z. (2016). Mobile apps for science learning: Review of research. Computers & Education, 94, 1–17.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Otero, N., Oakley, I. (2019). External Representations and the Design of Seamless Learning Systems. In: Looi, CK., Wong, LH., Glahn, C., Cai, S. (eds) Seamless Learning. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3071-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3071-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3070-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3071-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)