Skip to main content

Intelligent Control for Human-Robot Cooperation in Orthopedics Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 1093))

Abstract

Cooperation between surgeon and robot is one of the key technologies that limit the robot to be widely used in orthopedic clinics. In this study, the evolution of human-robot cooperation methods and the control strategies for typical human-robot cooperation in robot-assisted orthopedics surgery were reviewed at first. Then an intelligent admittance control method, which combines the fuzzy model reference learning control with the virtual constraint control, is proposed to solve the requirements of intuitive human-robot interaction during orthopedics surgery. That is, a variable damping parameter model of the admittance control based on fuzzy model learning control algorithm is introduced to make the robot move freely by using the reference model of surgeon’s motion equation with the minimum jerk trajectory. And the virtual constraint control method based on the principle of virtual fixture is adopted to make the robot move within the pre-defined area so as to perform more safe surgery. The basic principle and its realization of this intelligent control method are described in details. At last, a test platform is built based on our designed 6 DOF articulated robot. Experiments of safety and precision on acrylic model with this method show that the robot has the ability of better intuitive interaction and the high precision. And the pilot experiment of bone tumor resection on sawbone model shows the effectiveness of this method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Baena F, Davies B (2010) Robotic surgery: from autonomous systems to intelligent tools. Robotica 28(2):163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Banks SA (2009) Haptic robotics enable a systems approach to design of a minimally invasive modular knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop 38(2):23–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cinquin P (2011) How today’s robots work and perspectives for the future. J Visc Surg 148(5):12–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cruces RA, Wahrburg J (2007) Improving robot arm control for safe and robust haptic cooperation in orthopaedic procedures. Int J Med Robot Comp Assist Surg 3(4):316–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dimeas F, Aspragathos N (2014) Fuzzy learning variable admittance control for human-robot cooperation. Paper presented at the international conference on the intelligent robots and systems (IROS), 4770–4775 September 2014

    Google Scholar 

  6. Duchaine V, Gosselin CM (2007) General model of human-robot cooperation using a novel velocity based variable impedance control. Paper presented at the euro haptics symposium on haptic interfaces for virtual environment and Teleoperator systems, 446–451 March 2007

    Google Scholar 

  7. Haidegger T, Benyó B, Kovács L et al (2009) Force sensing and force control for surgical robots. IFAC Proc 42(12):401–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hancock PA, Billings DR, Schaefer KE et al (2011) A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Hum Factors 53(5):517–527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ho SC, Hibberd RD, Davies BL (1995) Robot assisted knee surgery. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 14(3):292–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ikeura R, Inooka H (1995). Variable impedance control of a robot for cooperation with a human. Paper presented at the international conference on the Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 3097–3102 May 1995

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jakopec M, Baena FR, Harris SJ et al (2003) The hands-on Orthopaedic robot “Acrobot”: early clinical trials of Total knee replacement surgery. Trans Robot Autom 19(5):902–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kapoor A, Li M, Taylor RH (2006) Constrained control for surgical assistant robots. Paper presented at the international conference on the Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 231-236 May 2006

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kazanzides P, Zuhars J, Mittelstadt B, et al (1992) Force sensing and control for a surgical robot. Paper presented at the international c on the robotics and automation, 612–617 May 1992

    Google Scholar 

  14. Khan F, Pearle A, Lightcap C et al (2013) Haptic robot-assisted surgery improves accuracy of wide resection of bone tumors: a pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(3):851–859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kwon DS, Yoon YS, Lee JJ et al (2001) ARTHROBOT: a new surgical robot system for total hip arthroplasty. Intell Robot Syst 2:1123–1128

    Google Scholar 

  16. Langlotz F, Nolte LP (2004) Technical approaches to computer-assisted orthopedic surgery. Eur J Trauma 30(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Layne JR, Passino KM (1993) Fuzzy model reference learning control for cargo ship steering. IEEE Control Syst 13(6):23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Layne JR, Passino KM (1996) Fuzzy model reference learning control. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 4(1):33–47

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lecours A, Mayer-St-Onge B, Gosselin C (2012) Variable admittance control of a four-degree-of-freedom intelligent assist device. Paper presented at the international conference on the Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 3903-3908 May 2012

    Google Scholar 

  20. Leung KS, Ning TANG, Cheung LW et al (2008) Robotic arm in orthopaedic trauma surgery–early clinical experience and a review. Spinal Surg 1(2): 3–4

    Google Scholar 

  21. Maillet P, Nahum B, Blondel L, et al (2005) BRIGIT, a robotized tool guide for orthopedic surgery. Paper presented at the international conference on the Robotics and Automation, 211–216 April 2005

    Google Scholar 

  22. Marayong P, Li M, Okamura AM., Hager GD (2003) Spatial motion constraints: theory and demonstrations for robot guidance using virtual fixtures. Paper presented at the 3rd international conference on the Robotics and Automation, 1954–1959 September 2003

    Google Scholar 

  23. Miller L (2011) Robotics in orthopedic surgery: 6 points on the present and future. In: Becker’s orthopedic, Spine & Pain Management Review. http://www.beckersorthopedicandspine.com/orthopedic- spine-device-mplant-news/item/4201-robotics-in-orthopedic-surgery-6-points-on-the-present-and-future. Accessed 1 Jan 2013

  24. Newman WS (1992) Stability and performance limits of interaction controllers. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 114(4):563–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ott C, Mukherjee R, Nakamura Y (2010) Unified impedance and admittance control. Paper presented at the international conference on the robotics and automation (ICRA), 554–561 May 2010

    Google Scholar 

  26. Quaid AE, Kang H, Moses D et al (2014) Haptic guidance method. United State Patent No. 8911499B2

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rahman MM, Ikeura R., Mizutani K (1999) Investigating the impedance characteristic of human arm for development of robots to co-operate with human operators. Paper presented at the 99th international conference on the Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 676–681 1999

    Google Scholar 

  28. Robotics VO (2013) A roadmap for US robotics: from internet to robotics. Robotics Virtual Organization

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sugano N (2003) Computer-assisted orthopedic surgery. J Orthop Sci 8(3):442–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Taylor RH (2006) A perspective on medical robotics. Proc IEEE 94(9):1652–1664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Taylor RH, Mittelstadt BD, Paul HA et al (1994) An image-directed robotic system for precise orthopaedic surgery. Trans Robot Autom 10(3): 261–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Troccaz J, Delnondedieu Y (1996) Semi-active guiding systems in surgery. A two-dof prototype of the passive arm with dynamic constraints (PADyC). Mechatronics 6(4):399–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by many individuals and organizations. In particular, we would like to thank Dr. HU Yan from Jinan University and Dr. GAN Minfeng and Dr. ZHOU Xiaofei from First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University for their valuable suggestions during our research. This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61375090, U1613224) and National High-tech R&D Program (863 Program) (No. 2015AA043204).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shaolong Kuang or Lining Sun .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kuang, S., Tang, Y., Lin, A., Yu, S., Sun, L. (2018). Intelligent Control for Human-Robot Cooperation in Orthopedics Surgery. In: Zheng, G., Tian, W., Zhuang, X. (eds) Intelligent Orthopaedics. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1093. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1396-7_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics