Skip to main content

Federated Hybrid Clouds Service Level Agreements and Legal Issues

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Third International Congress on Information and Communication Technology

Abstract

Cloud computing has been adapted by various sectors due to its diversified benefits in terms of applications, services, different cloud delivery models, architectures, ease of use, cost, performance, and customized offerings. Cloud vendors are bound to provide the quality of services (QoS) to cloud tenants as promised in the service level agreement (SLA) mutually agreed between both parties. Despite having SLA contracts a wide range of legal issues surface as majority of new and existing cloud tenants “fail to understand the federated cloud functionality and SLA exclusions”. The newly formed federated cloud models and vendors lack standardization, performance, reliability, and trust. The authors highlight various SLA and legal based issues with the help of a use-case example in the federated hybrid and multi-cloud ecosystem which may lead cloud tenants into vendor lock-in, operational complexity, security and SLA breaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kelaidonis D, Vlacheas P, Stavroulaki V, Georgoulas S, Moessner K, Hashi Y, Hashimoto K, Miyake Y, Yamada K, Demestichas P (2017) Cloud internet of things framework for enabling services in smart cities. In: Angelakis V, Tragos E, Pöhls H, Kapovits A, Bassi A (eds) Designing, developing, and facilitating smart cities. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44924-1_9

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alhamad M, Dillon T, Chang E (2010) SLA-based trust model for cloud computing. In: 2010 13th International conference on network-based information systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/nbis.2010.67

  3. Abawajy J (2009) Determining service trustworthiness in intercloud computing environments. In: 2009 10th International symposium on pervasive systems, algorithms, and networks. https://doi.org/10.1109/i-span.2009.155

  4. Rhoton J (2011) Cloud computing explained, 2nd edn. Recursive Press, US and UK

    Google Scholar 

  5. NIST Cloud Computing Standards Roadmap, http://selil.com/CLOUD/thoughtData/1/NIST_CCSRWG_092_NIST_SP_500-291_Jul5.pdf. Last accessed 7 Apr 2017

  6. Dhirani LL, Newe T, Nizamani S (2016) Tenant—vendor and third-party agreements for the cloud: considerations for security provision. Int J Softw Eng Appl 10(12):449–460. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijseia.2016.10.12.37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Keller A, Ludwig H (2002) Defining and monitoring service level agreements for dynamic e-business. In: Proceedings of the 16th system administration conference LISA

    Google Scholar 

  8. Patra PK, Singh H, Singh R, Das S, Dey N, Victoria ADC (2016) Replication and resubmission based adaptive decision for fault tolerance in real time cloud computing: a new approach. Int J Serv Sci Manage Eng Technol (IJSSMET) 7(2):46–60. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijssmet.2016040104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Paschke A, Bichler M (2008) Knowledge representation concepts for automated SLA management. Decis Support Syst 46(1):187–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2008.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fatema K, Emeakaroha VC, Healy PD, Morrison JP, Lynn T (2014) A survey of cloud monitoring tools: taxonomy, capabilities and objectives. J Parallel Distrib Comput 74(10):2918–2933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2014.06.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Naser A, Zolkipli MF, Anwar S, Al-Hawawreh MS (2016) Present status and challenges in cloud monitoring framework: a survey. In: 2016 European intelligence and security informatics conference (EISIC). IEEE, p 201

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rak M, Venticinque S, Mhr T, Echevarria G, Esnal G (2011) Cloud application monitoring: the mOSAIC approach. In: 2011 IEEE third international conference on cloud computing technology and science. IEEE, pp 758–763. https://doi.org/10.1109/cloudcom.2011.117

  13. Zeginis C, Kritikos K, Garefalakis P, Konsolaki K, Magoutis K, Plexousakis D (2013) Towards cross-layer monitoring of multi-cloud service-based applications. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8135, pp 188–195, LNCS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40651-5_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Brogi A, Ibrahim A, Soldani J, Carrasco J, Cubo J, Pimentel E, D’Andria F (2014) Seaclouds: a european project on seamless management of multi-cloud applications. ACM SIGSOFT Softw Eng Notes 39(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/2557833.2557844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. SINTEF: Model-based provisioning and deployment of cloud-based systems, http://cloudml.org. Last accessed 10 Dec 2017

  16. SLALOM project: Service level agreement—legal and open model, www.slalom-project.eu/. Last accessed 10 Dec 2017

  17. Rios E, Rak M, Iturbe E, Mallouli W (2017) SLA-based continuous security assurance in multi-cloud DevOps. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings

    Google Scholar 

  18. Calcavecchia NM, Celesti A, Di Nitto E (2012) Understanding decentralized and dynamic brokerage in federated cloud environments. In: Achieving federated and self-manageable cloud infrastructures: theory and practice, vol 36

    Google Scholar 

  19. Celesti A, Tusa F, Villari M, Puliafito A (2011) Intercloud: the future of cloud computing. Concepts and advantages. In: Cloud computing: methodology, systems, and applications, p 167193

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Bhoj P, Singhal S, Chutani S (2001) SLA management in federated environments. Comput Netw 35(1):5–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1286(00)00149-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Alhamad M, Dillon T, Chang E (2010) Conceptual SLA framework for cloud computing. In: 4th IEEE international conference on digital ecosystems and technologies. https://doi.org/10.1109/dest.2010.5610586

  22. Erl T, Mahmood Z, Puttini R (2013) Cloud computing concepts, technology & architecture. Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  23. Erl T, Cope R, Naserpour A (2015) Cloud computing design patterns. Prentice-Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Amazon Web Services, https://aws.com/ec2/sla/. Last accessed 20 Dec 2017

  25. SLA for cloud services, https://azures.microsoft.com/en-us/support/legal/sla/cloud-services/v1_0/, Last accessed 20 Dec 2017

  26. Google Compute Engine SLA, http://cloud.google.com/compute/sla. Last accessed 20 Dec 2017

  27. Hay B, Nance K, Bishop M (2011) Storm clouds rising: security challenges for IaaS cloud computing. In: Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, pp 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2011.386

  28. Pearson S, Benameur A (2010) Privacy, security and trust issues arising from cloud computing. In: IEEE Second international conference on cloud computing technology and science. https://doi.org/10.1109/cloudcom.2010.66

  29. The Cloud Security Alliance, https://cloudsecurityalliance.org/. Last accessed 20 May 2017

  30. Ballani H, Jang K, Karagiannis T, Kim C, Gunawardena D, O’Shea G (2013) Chatty tenants and the cloud network sharing problem. In: 10th USENIX Symposium on networked systems design and implementation

    Google Scholar 

  31. Buyya R, Ranjan R, Calheiros RN (2010) InterCloud: utility-oriented federation of cloud computing environments for scaling of application services. In: Hsu CH, Yang LT, Park JH, Yeo SS (eds) Algorithms and architectures for parallel processing. ICA3PP 2010. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 6081. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13119-6_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Bermbach D, Klems M, Tai S, Menzel M (2011) MetaStorage: a federated cloud storage system to manage consistency-latency tradeoffs. In: 2011 IEEE 4th international conference on cloud computing. https://doi.org/10.1109/cloud.2011.62

  33. Rochwerger B, Breitgand D, Levy E, Galis A, Nagin K, Llorente I, Montero R, Wolfsthal Y, Elmroth E, Caceres J, Ben-Yehuda M, Emmerich W, Galan F (2009) The reservoir model and architecture for open federated cloud computing. IBM J Res Dev 53(4):1–4:11. https://doi.org/10.1147/jrd.2009.5429058

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lubna Luxmi Dhirani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dhirani, L.L., Newe, T., Nizamani, S. (2019). Federated Hybrid Clouds Service Level Agreements and Legal Issues. In: Yang, XS., Sherratt, S., Dey, N., Joshi, A. (eds) Third International Congress on Information and Communication Technology. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 797. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1165-9_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1165-9_44

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1164-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1165-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics