Skip to main content

A Bibliometric Analysis of AEGC Scientific Outreach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Vision Research, Volume II

Part of the book series: Essentials in Ophthalmology ((ESSENTIALS))

Abstract

The Asian Eye Genetics Consortium (AEGC) encourages and facilitates research and clinical collaborations to understand the genetic etiology and physiology of ophthalmic diseases and work toward clinical care and treatment. Bibliometric analysis of ophthalmic genetic publications in Asian countries provides a tool to better understand research strengths and challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cole FJ, Eales NB. The history of comparative anatomy. Part I: A statistical analysis of the literature. Sci Prog. 1917;11:578–96.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Raisig LM. Statistical bibliography in the health sciences. Bull MLA. 1962;50(3):450–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pritchard A. Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. J Doc. 1969;25(4):348.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guerin MB, Flynn TH, Brady J, O’Brien CJ. Worldwide geographical distribution of ophthalmology publications. Int Ophthalmol. 2009;29:511–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mandal K, Benson S, Fraser SG. The contribution to ophthalmic literature from different regions of the world. Int Ophthalmol. 2004;25(3):181–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ohba N. Bibliometric analysis of the current international ophthalmic publications. Nihon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2005;109(3):115–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schulz CB, Kennedy A, Rymler BC. Trends in ophthalmology journals: a five-year bibliometric analysis (2009–2013). Int J Ophthalmol. 2016;9(11):1669–75.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Davis M, Wilson CS. Research contributions in ophthalmology: Australia’s productivity. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003;31(4):286–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kumaragurupari R, Sieving PC, Lalitha P. A bibliometric study of publications by Indian ophthalmologists and vision researchers, 2001–6. Ind J Ophthalmol. 2010;58(4):275–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pahor D. Beitrag Sloweniens zur Forschung in der Ophthalmologie (1991–2009). Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2011;228(3):220–5.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rahman M, Sakamoto J. Fujui. Japan’s share of published research in ophthalmology. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2003;47(2):221–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Risal S, Prasad HN. Vision science literature of Nepal in the database “Web of Science”. Nepal J Ophthalmol. 2012;4(8):303–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wolfram C. Ophthalmologische Publikationen aus Deutschland. Ophthalmologe. 2008;105(12):1115–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yohendran J, Yohendran K. Review of Australian indigenous eye health research published in the last decade. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;32(4):450–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ragghianti CP, Martinez R, Martins J, Gallo JE. Comparative study of scientific publications in ophthalmology and visual sciences in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Paraguay and Uruguay (1995–2004). Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2006;69(5):719–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sweileh WM, Al-Jabi SW, Shanti YI, Sawalha AF, Zyoud SH. Contribution of Arab researchers to ophthalmology: a bibliometric and comparative analysis. Springerplus. 2015;4:42–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Boudry C, Mouriaux F. Eye neoplasm research: a bibliometric analysis from 1966 to 2012. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2015;25(4):357–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cardona G, Sanz JP. Citation parameters of contact lens-related articles published in the ophthalmic literature. Eye Contact Lens. 2014;40(5):301–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dai YL, Sun K, Wang W, Zhang YX, Wei SH, et al. Bibliometric analysis of research articles on traumatic optic neuropathy. Int Eye Sci. 2013;13(2):400–4.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dong L-Y, Yin M, Kang X-L. Bibliometric network analysis of glaucoma. Genet Mol Res. 2014;13(2):3577–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fan JC, McGhee CNJ. Citation analysis of the most influential authors and ophthalmology journals in the field of cataract and corneal refractive surgery 2000–2004. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;36(1):54–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mimouni M, Segal O, Mimouni FB, Nemet AY. Trends in pediatric versus adult ophthalmology publications over 15 years. J Ped Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2015;52(4):239–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pekel E, Pekel G. Publication trends in corneal transplantation: a bibliometric analysis. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016;16(1):194–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Royle P, Waugh N. Macular disease research in the United Kingdom 2011–2014: a bibliometric analysis of outputs, performance and coverage. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:833–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Şenel E, Demir E, Alkan RM. Bibliometric analysis on global Behçet disease publications during 1980–2014: is there a Silk Road in the literature? J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31(3):518–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang Y, Liu Z, Wang Y. Citation analysis of the ocular ischemic syndrome literature. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2014;50(12):906–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wen P-F, Dong Z-Y, Li B-Z, Jia Y-Q. Bibliometric analysis of literature on cataract research in PubMed (2001–2013). J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(8):1781–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zuchner S, Mersiyanova IV, Muglia M, Bissar-Tadmouri N, Rochelle J, et al. Mutations in the mitochondrial GTPase mitofusin 2 cause Charcot-Marie-tooth neuropathy type 2A. Nat Genet. 2004;36(5):449–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Heier JS, Brown DM, Chong V, Korobelnik JF, Kaiser PK, et al. Intravitreal aflibercept (VEGF trap-eye) in wet age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(12):2537–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yoshida A, Kobayashi K, Manya H, Taniguchi K, Kano H, et al. Muscular dystrophy and neuronal migration disorder caused by mutations in a glycosyltransferase, POMGnT1. Dev Cell. 2001;1(5):717–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sieving, P.C. (2019). A Bibliometric Analysis of AEGC Scientific Outreach. In: Prakash, G., Iwata, T. (eds) Advances in Vision Research, Volume II. Essentials in Ophthalmology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0884-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0884-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0883-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0884-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics