Skip to main content

Abstract

Field trips may best be viewed as a form of short-term experiential learning offering meaningful experiences that play an extremely crucial role in successful educational initiatives. The study of field trips has largely been overlooked by education-related literature that generally focuses on classroom, text-based, and, more recently, computer- or electronic media-based learning. Within the tourism context, only 2% of the literature is associated with education and training. In the light of this literature gap, this study examines the perceived values of field trips through the eyes of tourism students. The sample was a group of tourism-major students who recently went on an international field trip in partial fulfillment of the course requirements. Online survey was employed to collect data which were then analyzed using both descriptives and content analysis. The findings were in accord with those of previous studies, promoting the five key values of field trips. The study confirmed the importance of incorporating field trips in the curriculum not for the sole purpose of knowledge acquisition or enhancement but also for students’ personal and social growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., & Axelsen, M. (2009). Trends in tourism research. Annals Tourism Research, 36(1), 149–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2008.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberger, Y., & Tal, T. (2008). Multiple outcomes of class visits to natural history museums: The students’ view. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 274–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9097-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (1999). Peer learning and assessment. Assessment Evaluation Higher Education, 24(4), 413–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goh, E. (2011). The value and benefits of field trips in tourism and hospitality education. Higher Learning Research Communications, 1(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v1i1.18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grauerholz, E., & Copenhaver, S. (1994). When the personal becomes problematic: The ethics of using experiential teaching methods. Teaching Sociology, 22, 319–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. P., Kisida, B., & Bowen, D. H. (2014). The educational value of field trips. Education Next, 2014, 78–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, E. L., & Carpenter, J. R. (1984). Enhancement of student values, interests and attitudes in earth science through a field-oriented approach. Journal of Geological Education, 32, 299–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, C., Walsh, C., Almond, N., & Myers, C. (2016). The ‘real value’ of field trips in the early weeks of higher education: The student perspective. Educational Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2016.1245604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mongkhonvanit, J. (2007). Field trips as experiential education: A case study of Siam University’s professional doctoral program in educational administration. International Forum Teaching Studies, 3(3), 62–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, L. J., & Johnston, D. J. (2004). The nature of learning and its implications for research on learning from museums. Science Education, 88(S1), S4–S16. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riegel, U., & Kindermann, K. (2016). Why leave the classroom? How field trips to the church affect cognitive learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 41, 106–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarce, R. (1997). Field trips as short-term experiential education. Teaching Sociology, 25(3), 219–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorrentino, A. V., & Bell, P. E. (1970). A comparison of attributed values with empirically determined values of secondary school science field trips. Science Education, 54(3), 233–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. C., & Williams, C. C. (2011). Five key ingredients for improving student motivation. Research Higher Education Journal, 12, 1–23 http://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/11834.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M. C. (2000). Getting more out of less: The benefits of short-term experiential learning in undergraduate sociology courses. Teaching Sociology, 28(2), 116–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christy Bidder .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bidder, C., Kibat, S.A., Johnny, C. (2019). Tourism Education: Students’ Perceived Values of Field Trips. In: Mat Noor, A., Mohd Zakuan, Z., Muhamad Noor, S. (eds) Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Future of ASEAN (ICoFA) 2017 - Volume 1. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8730-1_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics