Skip to main content

Urban Systems Between National and Global: Recent Reconfiguration Through Transnational Networks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International and Transnational Perspectives on Urban Systems

Part of the book series: Advances in Geographical and Environmental Sciences ((AGES))

Abstract

Because the whole book’s issue assumes the uneven integrations of national/continental urban systems inside the global economy, this chapter evaluates the rates and qualitative modes of integration of the national urban systems by the economic networks that are dominated by multinational firms. The empirical study encompasses the largest 1250 cities of the world delineated in a comparative way according to common definitions of large urban regions (LURs). The position of LURs in multinational firms’ ownership networks in 2 years, 2010 and 2013, corresponds to the deepest period of the crisis and the following recovery, respectively. Thus, we checked that the fast reorganization of multinational firms facing this crisis between 2010 and 2013 did not fundamentally transform their strong urban organization but rather introduced some minor changes, particularly due to the simultaneous breakthrough of emergent countries’ companies (especially the Chinese ones). Synthetic network clustering methods partitioning cities of the world offer clear visions of the structure of the multipolar urban networks. They reveal “regions” of integration of cities for all kinds of multinational companies but also distinguishing companies according to their skill levels either in industry or in services. A special attention is given to some highly integrated cities appearing with properties of “city-states,” i.e., without a strong national urban system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The empirical study of cities’ globalization is based on a large database that we update regularly, encompassing the direct or indirect ownership networks of the 3000 main groups of the world (approximately 800,000 enterprises linked by one million financial linkages at each date and positioned in comparative urban areas [see (2) below for more precision]) (source: Bureau Van Dijk 2010, 2013).

  2. 2.

    This database encompasses about 700,000 subsidiaries in 2010 and 800,000 subsidiaries in 2013, linked by one million filiation links in 2010 and 1.2 million in 2013. The 3000 first firms are different in 2010 and in 2013, only maintaining a common part, for which the network of subsidiaries could change. Through these independent data, we can evaluate the main strength of the global networks at each date, considering the transformations of the dominant economic actors.

  3. 3.

    This preparation needs some huge efforts and a high-level expertise for each country to evaluate the relevance of the LURs’ delineations.

  4. 4.

    These calculations are based on the total initial number of cities and all their weighted linkages.

  5. 5.

    We note that this total is not the sum of continents or countries because for the example of continents, intercontinental linkages count for each of them (counting twice, i.e., for both continents they concern). This explains why the proportion of intercontinental linkages is much higher for each continent than it is for the total.

  6. 6.

    To compare cluster partitioning, we used the Normalized Mutual Information (NMI) method, as proposed by Danon et al. (2005). Given two partitional structures of a network, the NMI calculates the proportion of couples remaining in the same groups and thus returns a value in a range between 100% (perfect similarity) and 0% (complete dissimilarity).

References

  • Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson JA (2001) Reversal of fortune: geography and institutions in the making of the modern world income distribution (No. w8460). National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Alderson AS, Beckfield J (2004) Power and position in the world city system. Am J Sociol 109(4):811–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen R (1981) The new international division of labor: Multinational corporations and urban hierarchy. In: Dear M, Scott A (eds) Urbanization and Urban planning in capitalist society. Methuen, London, pp 287–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Danon L, Diaz-Guilera A, Duch J, Arenas A (2005) Comparing community structure identification. J Stat Mech Theory Exp. IOP Publishing

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derudder B, Taylor P (2005) The cliquishness of world cities. Global Netw 5(1):71–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derudder B, Taylor PJ, Witlox F, Catalano G (2003) Hierarchical tendencies and regional patterns in the world city network: a global urban analysis of 234 cities. Reg Stud 37(9):875–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterly W, Levine R (2001) What have we learned from a decade of empirical research on growth? It’s not factor accumulation: stylized facts and growth models. World Bank Econ Rev 15(2):177–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsheshtawy Y (2010) Little space, big space: everyday urbanism in Dubai. Brown J World Aff 17(1):53–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama F (1995) Social capital and the global economy. Foreign Aff 74:89–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey D (2009) The art of rent: globalisation, monopoly and the commodification of culture. Socialist Regist 38(38):93–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill RC, Fujita K (2003) The nested city: introduction. Urban Stud 40(2):2007–2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Krätke S (2014) How manufacturing industries connect cities across the world: extending research on ‘multiple globalizations’. Global Netw 14(2):121–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis J, Zhang M (1998) The second generation of the California urban futures model. Part 1: Model logic and theory. Environ Plann B Plann Des 25(5):657–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lever WF (1997) Delinking urban economies: the European experience. J Urban Aff 19(2):227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer D (1986) The world system of cities: relation between international financial metropolises and South American cities. Soc Forces 64(3):553–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murayama Y (2000) Japanese urban system, Kluwer Academic Pubishers, The Geojournal Library, Holanda, 271 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal Z (2012) Structural determinism in the interlocking world city network. Geogr Anal 44(2):162–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2009) OSLO MANUAL: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, OECD/European Communities, http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org

  • Polese M (2005) Cities and national economic growth: a reappraisal. Urban Stud 42(8):1429–1451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pred A (1977) City-systems in advanced economies. Hutchinson University Library, London, 256 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichardt J, Bornholdt S (2006) Statistical mechanics of community detection. Phys Rev E 74(1):016110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi U (2017) Cities in global capitalism. Wiley, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozenblat C (2010) Cities networks and competitiveness. In: Lennert M (ed) FOCI: Future Orientation of Cities in Europe, ESPON report

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozenblat C (2015) Inter-cities’ multinational firms networks and gravitation model. Ann Jpn Assoc Econ Geogr 61(3):219–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozenblat C, Pumain D (1993) The location of multinational firms in the European urban system. Urban Stud 30(10):1691–1709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozenblat C, Pumain D (2007) Firm linkages, innovation and the evolution of urban systems. In: Taylor PJ et al (eds) Cities in Globalization. Practices, policies and theories. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 130–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozenblat C, Zaidi F, Bellwald A (2017) The multipolar regionalization of cities in the multinational firms’ networks. Global Netw 17(2):171–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassen S (1991) The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen S (2007) Sociology of globalization. W.W. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen S (2010) Novel spatial formats: megaregions and global cities. In: Xu J, AOH Y (eds) Governance and planning of Mega-city regions: an international comparative perspective. Routledge, New York, pp 101–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott AJ (2012) A world in emergence: cities and regions in the 21st century. Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Short JR, Kim YH (1999) Globalization and the city. Longman, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark D (1996) Recombinant property in East European capitalism. Am J Sociol 101:993–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storper M (1997) The regional world: territorial development in a global economy. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PJ (2001) Specification of the world city network. Geogr Anal 33(2):181–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PJ, Catalano G, Walker DRF (2002) Exploratory analysis of the world city network. Urban Stud 39(13):2377–2394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PJ, Derudder B, Hoyler M, Ni P (2013) New regional geographies of the world as practised by leading advanced producer service firms in 2010. Trans Inst Br Geogr 38(3):497–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobler W (1970) A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Econ Geogr 46(Supplement):234–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2014) United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Review of Maritime Transport

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall R (2009) NETSCAPE: cities and global corporate networks. PhD Erasmus University Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall RS, van der Knaap GA (2011) Sectorial differentiation and network structure within contemporary worldwide corporate networks. Econ Geogr 87(3):267–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter J, Lechner C, Kellermanns FW (2007) Knowledge transfer between and within alliance partners: private versus collective benefits of social capital. J Bus Res 60:698–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684):440–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wójcik D (2013) Where governance fails: advanced business services and the offshore world. Prog Hum Geogr 37(3):330–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Celine Rozenblat .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rozenblat, C. (2018). Urban Systems Between National and Global: Recent Reconfiguration Through Transnational Networks. In: Rozenblat, C., Pumain, D., Velasquez, E. (eds) International and Transnational Perspectives on Urban Systems. Advances in Geographical and Environmental Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7799-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics