Skip to main content
  • 823 Accesses

Abstract

The Internet has so fundamentally changed research and publishing—searching, collaborating, communicating, analysing, authoring, publishing, distributing, sharing and publishing business models—that it is difficult to recall how either process occurred without it. While the scope of change reaches far beyond what this chapter will cover, authors should be aware of some central issues related to electronic publishing. Most of this chapter pertains primarily to journal publishing, but the information on drafting content applies to any form of authoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Clark J. How to avoid predatory journals—a five-point plan. BMJ Blogs. http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2015/01/19/jocalyn-clark-how-to-avoid-predatory-journals-a-five-point-plan/. Accessed 9 Sept 2015.

  2. World Association of Medical Editors, Committee on Publication Ethics, Directory of Open Access Journals, Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association. Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing. http://www.wame.org/about/principles-of-transparency-and-best-practice. Accessed 9 Sept 2015.

  3. National Institutes of Health. Public access policy. http://publicaccess.nih.gov/. Accessed 25 Apr 2015.

  4. Open access policy. Medical Research Council. www.mrc.ac.uk/research/research-policy-ethics/open-access-policy/. Accessed 25 Apr 2015.

  5. Open access policy: position statement in support of open and unrestricted access to published research. www.wellcome.ac.uk/About-us/Policy/Spotlight-issues/Open-access/Policy/index.htm. Accessed 25 Apr 2015.

  6. HINARI. http://www.who.int/hinari/en/. Accessed 25 Apr 2015.

  7. Lundh A, Barbateskovic M, Hróbjartsson A, Gøtzsche PC. Conflicts of interest at medical journals: the influence of industry-supported randomised trials on journal impact factors and revenue––cohort study. PLoS Med. 2010;7:e1000354. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000354.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. JAMA. Authorship responsibility, financial disclosure, acknowledgment, and copyright transfer/publishing agreement. http://jama.jamanetwork.com/data/ifora-forms/jama/auinst_crit.pdf. Accessed 25 Apr 2015.

  9. Open-access license: no permission required. PLOS. http://www.plosone.org/static/license.action. Accessed 25 Apr 2015.

  10. About the licenses: what our licenses do. Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/. Accessed 25 Apr 2015.

  11. Figures. PLOS Medicine. http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/s/figures. Accessed 2 Jun 2015.

  12. Figures in accepted manuscript. JAMA. http://jama.jamanetwork.com/data/ifora-forms/jama/jamatechreqfigures.pdf. Accessed 2 Jun 2015.

  13. Announcement regarding supplemental material. http://www.jneurosci.org/content/30/32/10599.full. Accessed 25 Apr 2015.

  14. PLOS. Editorial and publishing policies: sharing of materials, methods, and data. www.plos.org/policies/#sharing. Accessed 2 Jun 2015.

  15. NISO/NFAIS Supplemental Journal Article Materials Project. http://www.niso.org/workrooms/supplemental. Accessed 25 Apr 2015.

  16. Rossner M, Yamada KM. What’s in a picture? The temptation of image manipulation. J Cell Biol. 2004;166:11–5. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200406019.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Image integrity. Archives of dermatology instructions for authors. http://archderm.jamanetwork.com/public/instructionsForAuthors.aspx#SecFigures. Accessed 2 Jun 2012.

  18. Data Integrity. About JCB. http://jcb.rupress.org/site/misc/about.xhtml. Accessed 25 Apr 2015.

  19. Relman AS. The Ingelfinger rule. N Engl J Med. 1981;305:824–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Anonymous. Definition of ‘sole contribution’. N Engl J Med. 1969;281:676–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. PLOS embargo policy. http://www.plos.org/about/media-inquiries/embargo-policy/. Accessed 25 Apr 2015.

  22. Amin M, Mabe M. Impact factors: use and abuse. Elsevier Perspectives in Publishing October 2000; revised 2007. http://www.elsevier.com/framework_editors/pdfs/Perspectives1.pdf. Accessed 25 Apr 2015.

  23. Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. arXiv:physics/0508025v5. 29 Sept 2005. http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~palsberg/hirsch05.pdf. Accessed 25 Apr 2015.

  24. About Eigenfactor.org. http://www.eigenfactor.org/about.php. Accessed 25 Apr 2015.

  25. Usage factor: introduction to release 1 of the COUNTER code of practice for usage factors. http://www.projectcounter.org/usage_factor.html. Accessed 2 Jun 2015.

  26. Priem J, Taraboreilli D, Groth P, Neylon C. Altmetrics: a manifesto. 26 October 2010. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/. Accessed 25 Apr 2015.

  27. PLOS. Article level metrics. Overview. http://article-level-metrics.plos.org/alm-info/. Accessed 25 Apr 2015.

  28. Nature’s peer review trial. Nature 2006. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05535.

  29. Winker M. The promise of post-publication peer review: how do we get there from here? Learn Publish. 2015;28(2):143–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wodak SJ, Mietchen D, Collings AM, Russell RB, Bourne PE. Topic pages: PLoS computational biology meets Wikipedia. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8:e1002446. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002446.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Topic Pages. PLoS Comput Biol. http://topicpages.ploscompbiol.org/wiki/Topic_Pages#cite_note-TopiPageCollection-4. Accessed 26 Aug 2015.

  32. Ravenhall M, Skunca M, Lassalle F, Dessimoz C. Inferring horizontal gene transfer. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015;11:e1004095. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004095.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Inferring horizontal gene transfer. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inferring_horizontal_gene_transfer. Accessed 26 Aug 2015.

  34. Wager E, Williams P. Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008. J Med Ethics. 2011;37:567–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The National Medical Journal of India

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Winker, M. (2018). Electronic Publishing. In: Sahni, P., Aggarwal, R. (eds) Reporting and Publishing Research in the Biomedical Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7062-4_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7062-4_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7061-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7062-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics