Skip to main content

Do Large Herbivores Influence Plant Allocation to Above- and Belowground Compartments?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Ecological Studies ((ECOLSTUD,volume 225))

Abstract

Plants allocate biomass to aboveground (shoot) and belowground (root) structures to capture light and nutrients, respectively. Plant allocation strategies are a key feature of ecosystem structure, and function, as they have broad influence over material and energy flow. Herbivores can exercise strong control over plant allocation, and thereby influence ecosystem structure and function. Theoretical models of plant allocation strategies predict that root:shoot ratio is related to leaf nitrogen (N) concentration; specifically root:shoot ratio declines monotonically over a broad range of N concentrations. Here, I assess whether grazing by large mammalian herbivores alters the inverse relationship between root:shoot ratio and leaf-N concentration. Data from an herbivore exclusion experiment in the arid Trans-Himalayan ecosystem were in general agreement with predictions of theoretical models. Herbivores did not affect the slope of the relationship, rather they lowered the intercept, and this change was independent of their influence over plant community composition. Reduction in root:shoot ratio with increasing leaf-N, and lowering biomass allocation to roots with grazing, are consistent with other studies on how herbivores influence plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agren GI (1985) Theory for growth of plants derived from the nitrogen productivity concept. Physiol Plant 64:17–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agren GI, Ingestad T (1987) Root: shoot ratio as a balance between nitrogen productivity and photosynthesis. Plant, Cell Environ 10:579–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagchi S, Bhatnagar YV, Ritchie ME (2012) Comparing the effects of livestock and native herbivores on plant production and vegetation composition in the Trans-Himalayas. Pastoralism Res Policy Pract 2(21)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagchi S, Ritchie ME (2011) Herbivory and plant tolerance: experimental tests of alternative hypotheses involving non-substitutable resources. Oikos 120:119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagchi S, Ritchie ME (2010a) Herbivore effects on above- and belowground plant production and soil nitrogen availability in the Trans-Himalayas. Oecologia 164:1075–1082

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bagchi S, Ritchie ME (2010b) Introduced grazers can restrict potential soil carbon sequestration through impacts on plant community composition. Ecol Lett 13:959–968

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bazzaz FA, Chiariello NR, Coley PD, Pitelka LF (1987) Allocating resources to reproduction and defense. Bioscience 37:58–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derner JD, Boutton TW, Briske DD (2006) Grazing and ecosystem carbon storage in the North American Great Plains. Plant Soil 280:90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil M, Gadgil S (1979) Adaptive significance of the relation between root and shoot growth. J Indian Inst Sci 61:25–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton EW, Giovannini MS, Moses A, Coleman JS, McNaughton SJ (1988) Biomass and mineral element responses of a Serengeti short-grass species to nitrogen supply and defoliation: compensation requires a critical [N]. Oecologia 116:407–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert DW (1990) Optimization of plant root: shoot ratios and internal nitrogen concentration. Ann Bot 66:91

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert DW, Reynolds JF (1991) A model allocating growth among leaf proteins, shoot structure and root biomass to produce balanced activity. Ann Bot 68:417–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert DW, Swift DM, Detling JK, Dyer MI (1981) Relative growth rates and the grazing optimization hypothesis. Oecologia 51:14–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs NT (1996) Modification of ecosystems by ungulates. J Wildlife Manage 60:695–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson IR, Thornley JHM (1987) A model of shoot:root partitioning with optimal growth. Ann Bot 60:133–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin SA, Mooney HA, Field C (1989) The dependence of plant root: shoot ratios on internal nitrogen concentration. Ann Bot 64:71

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ (1976) Serengeti migratory wildebeest: facilitation of energy flow by grazing. Science 191:92–94

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ, Banyikwa FF, McNaughton MM (1997) Promotion of the cycling of diet-enhancing nutrients by African grazers. Science 278:1798–1800

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2008) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org

  • Sugiura D, Tateno M (2011) Optimal leaf-to-root ratio and leaf nitrogen content determined by light and nitrogen availabilities. PLoS ONE 6:e22236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The dataset used for this analysis was created with funding support from Syracuse University, US National Science Foundation (DDIG DEB-0608287), Rufford Foundation, and Wildlife Conservation Society. I am grateful to M.E. Ritchie, Y.V. Bhatnagar, and C. Mishra for numerous discussions on plant–herbivore interactions. I am also grateful to the Himachal Pradesh Department of Forest Farming and Conservation, and to all the assistants, interns, and volunteers who have worked very hard in helping me in the field. Initial drafts were greatly improved by critiques from anonymous referees and the editors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sumanta Bagchi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bagchi, S. (2016). Do Large Herbivores Influence Plant Allocation to Above- and Belowground Compartments?. In: Ahrestani, F., Sankaran, M. (eds) The Ecology of Large Herbivores in South and Southeast Asia. Ecological Studies, vol 225. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7570-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics