Abstract
Kurtén (1968) wrote that the origin of Rupicapra ‘is a mystery’. Today we know a little more on its evolution, although we are still far from having a clear picture of how chamois evolved. This is somewhat unusual when compared with the relatively extensive information available on other tribes of the subfamily Caprinae. On the other hand, it seems to be a common pattern in the Rupicaprini tribe. Why are palaeontological remains of Rupicaprini so rare? Most likely, such rarity depends on the nature of the terrain on which Rupicapra and the other members of its tribe seem to have always been dependent: a rocky, rugged, steep ground in which bones are easily crushed and eroded, thus preventing fossilisation (Masini and Lovari, in prep.). This fact makes it difficult to reconstruct the evolutionary biology of the genus Rupicapra, as we are unable to observe the development of body features and structures which suddenly appear in their ‘modern’ form in the late Mindel-early Riss (Mid-Pleistocene).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Berducou, C. (1985) Analyse de quelques relations entre une population’ de chamois des Pyrenées françaises et son environnement. In T. Balbo, P. Lan-franchi, P.G. Meneguz and L. Rossi. (eds) Atti Simposio Internazionale Cheratocongiuntivite Infettiva Camoscio, Centro Stampa Univeristà, Turin, pp. 125–46
Blahout, M. (1976) Kamzicia zver Priroda, Bratislava
Caughley, G. (1963) Dispersal rates of several ungulates introduced into New Zealand. Nature 200, 280–1
Clutton-Brock, T.H. and S.D. Albon (1979) The roaring of red deer and the evolution of honest advertisement. Behaviour 69, 145–70
Couturier, M. (1938) Le chamois. Arthaud, Grenoble
Elsner-Schack, I. von (1985) Seasonal changes in the sizes of chamois groups in the Ammergauer Mountains, Bavaria. In S. Lovari (ed.) The biology and management of mountain ungulates, Croom Helm, London, pp. 148–53
Ferrari, C. and S. Lovari. (1986) Premesse ambientali per una reintroduzione del camoscio appenninico (Rupicapra pyrenaica ornata). In Atti Cony. Prog. Faunistico Appenninico. Fed. Ital. Caccia, Pescara, pp. 86–9
Ferrari, C. and G. Rossi. (1985) Preliminary observations on the summer diet of the Abruzzo chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica ornata Neum.). In S. Lovari (ed.) The biology and management of mountain ungulates. Croom Helm, London, pp. 8592
Geist, V. (1978) Life strategies, human evolution, environmental design. Springer, New York and Berlin
Hamr, J. (1984) Home range size and determinant factors in habitat use and activity of the chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra L.) in Northern Tyrol, Austria. PhD thesis, Leopold Franzens Universität, Innsbruck
Knaus, W. and W. Schröder (1975) Das Gamswild. Paul Parey, Hamburg
Kurtén B. (1968) Pleistocene mammals of Europe. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London
Lovari, S. (1984a) Il popolo delle rocce. Rizzoli, Milan
Lovari, S. (1984b) Herding strategies of male Abruzzo chamois on the rut. Acta Zool. Fenn. 172, 91–2
Lovari, S. (1985) Behavioural repertoire of the Abruzzo chamois, Rupicapra pyrenaica Neumann, 1899 (Artiodactyla: Bovidae). Säugetierkundl. Mitt. 32, 113–36
Lovari, S. and R.F. Cosentino. (1986) Seasonal habitat selection and group size of the Abruzzo chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica ornata). Boll. Zool. 53, 73–8
Lovari, S. and G. Rosto. (1985) Feeding rate and social stress of female chamois foraging in a group. In S. Lovari (ed.) The biology and management of mountain ungulates. Croom Helm, London, pp. 102–5
Lovari, S. and C. Scala. (1980) Revision of Rupicapra genus. 1. A statistical reevaluation of Couturier’s data on the morphometry of six chamois subspecies. Boll. Zool. 47, 113–24
Masini, F. (1985) Würmian and Holocene chamois of Italy. In S. Lovari (ed.) The biology and management of mountain ungulates, Croom Helm, London, pp. 3144
Nascetti G., S. Lovari, P. Lanfranchi, C. Berducou, S. Mattiucci, L. Rossi and L. Bullini. (1985) Revision of Rupicapra genus. 3. Electrophoretic studies demonstrating species distinction of chamois populations of the Alps from those of the Apennines and Pyrenées. In S. Lovari (ed.) The biology and management of mountain ungulates. Croom Helm, London, pp. 56–62
Nei, M. (1972) Genetic distance between populations. Am. Natur. 106, 283–92
Schaller, G.B. (1977) Mountain monarchs. Wild sheep and goats of the Himalaya. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.
Shank, C.C. (1985) Inter-and intra-sexual segregation of chamois (Rupicapra rupi- capra) by altitude and habitat during summer. Z. Saugetierkunde 50, 117–25
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 Hiroaki Soma
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lovari, S. (1987). Evolutionary aspects of the biology of chamois, Rupicapra spp. (Bovidae, Caprinae). In: Soma, H. (eds) The Biology and Management of Capricornis and Related Mountain Antelopes. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-8030-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-8030-6_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-011-8032-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-8030-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive