Skip to main content

An Assessment of Attrition in a Multi-Wave Panel of Households

  • Chapter
Urban Dynamics and Spatial Choice Behaviour

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLU,volume 49))

Abstract

Attrition is an issue of great importance in empirical analysis using longitudinal data in which measurements are taken at two or more points in time on the same sample of units. Although attrition per se need not be a problem, any bias due to loss of sample size can have a profound effect on the usefulness of the empirical outputs of the study. For example, if in the current context of predicting automobile energy consumption the households that are lost at each recontact point are typically high-kilometre households then parameter estimates associated with a study in which vehicle use is endogenous could be significantly biased. If, however, there is no difference in the distribution of kilometres between the total sample and the continuing respondents, but there are some differences with respect to exogenous variables (e.g. number of workers, income, household size), it is not necessarily the case that attrition is a source of bias given the objectives of the study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Duncan, G.J., D.H. Hill, and M. Ponzo: 1984, ‘How representative is the PSID?: A response to some questions raised in the UNICON report’, Survey Research Center, University of Michigan (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J.A. and D.A. Wise: 1979, ‘Attrition bias in experimental and panel data: the Gary income experiment’, Econometrica 47, 455–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J.J.: 1979, ‘Sample selection bias as a specification error’, Econometrica 47, 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, D.A.: 1985, ‘Longitudinal surveys in transport: an assessment’, in E.S. Ampt, E.J. Richardson, and W. Brog (eds.), New Survey Methods in Transport, VNU Science Press, Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, D.A.: 1986a, ‘Dimensions of automobile demand: an overview of an Australian research project’, Environment and Planning A 18, 1339–1374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, D.A.: 1986b, ‘Issues in the pre-analysis of panel data’, Transportation Research A 21, 265–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, D.A. and N. Wrigley: 1986, ‘Statistical modelling of discrete choices in discrete time with panel data’, in Ministry of Transport and Public Works (ed.) Behavioural Researcn for Transport Policy, VNU Science Press, Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N.L. and S. Kotz: 1970, Distribution in Statistics: Continuous Univariate Distributions - - 1, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N.L. and S. Kotz: 1972, Distribution in Statistics: Continuous Multivariate Distributions, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura, R. and P.H.L. Bovy: 1987, ‘Analysis of attrition biases and trip reporting errors for panel data’, Transportation Research A 21, 287–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G.S.: 1979, ‘Selectivity problems in longitudinal data’, Annales de L’Insee 30–31, 423–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P.R. and D.E. Rubin: 1983, ‘The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects’, Biometrika 70, 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winer, R.S.: 1983, ‘Attrition bias in econometric models estimated with panel data’, Journal of Marketing Research 20, 177–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hensher, D.A. (1989). An Assessment of Attrition in a Multi-Wave Panel of Households. In: Hauer, J., Timmermans, H., Wrigley, N. (eds) Urban Dynamics and Spatial Choice Behaviour. Theory and Decision Library, vol 49. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1009-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1009-6_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6944-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1009-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics