Abstract
Attrition is an issue of great importance in empirical analysis using longitudinal data in which measurements are taken at two or more points in time on the same sample of units. Although attrition per se need not be a problem, any bias due to loss of sample size can have a profound effect on the usefulness of the empirical outputs of the study. For example, if in the current context of predicting automobile energy consumption the households that are lost at each recontact point are typically high-kilometre households then parameter estimates associated with a study in which vehicle use is endogenous could be significantly biased. If, however, there is no difference in the distribution of kilometres between the total sample and the continuing respondents, but there are some differences with respect to exogenous variables (e.g. number of workers, income, household size), it is not necessarily the case that attrition is a source of bias given the objectives of the study.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Duncan, G.J., D.H. Hill, and M. Ponzo: 1984, ‘How representative is the PSID?: A response to some questions raised in the UNICON report’, Survey Research Center, University of Michigan (mimeo).
Hausman, J.A. and D.A. Wise: 1979, ‘Attrition bias in experimental and panel data: the Gary income experiment’, Econometrica 47, 455–473.
Heckman, J.J.: 1979, ‘Sample selection bias as a specification error’, Econometrica 47, 153–161.
Hensher, D.A.: 1985, ‘Longitudinal surveys in transport: an assessment’, in E.S. Ampt, E.J. Richardson, and W. Brog (eds.), New Survey Methods in Transport, VNU Science Press, Utrecht.
Hensher, D.A.: 1986a, ‘Dimensions of automobile demand: an overview of an Australian research project’, Environment and Planning A 18, 1339–1374.
Hensher, D.A.: 1986b, ‘Issues in the pre-analysis of panel data’, Transportation Research A 21, 265–286.
Hensher, D.A. and N. Wrigley: 1986, ‘Statistical modelling of discrete choices in discrete time with panel data’, in Ministry of Transport and Public Works (ed.) Behavioural Researcn for Transport Policy, VNU Science Press, Utrecht.
Johnson, N.L. and S. Kotz: 1970, Distribution in Statistics: Continuous Univariate Distributions - - 1, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Johnson, N.L. and S. Kotz: 1972, Distribution in Statistics: Continuous Multivariate Distributions, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Kitamura, R. and P.H.L. Bovy: 1987, ‘Analysis of attrition biases and trip reporting errors for panel data’, Transportation Research A 21, 287–302.
Maddala, G.S.: 1979, ‘Selectivity problems in longitudinal data’, Annales de L’Insee 30–31, 423–450.
Rosenbaum, P.R. and D.E. Rubin: 1983, ‘The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects’, Biometrika 70, 41–55.
Winer, R.S.: 1983, ‘Attrition bias in econometric models estimated with panel data’, Journal of Marketing Research 20, 177–186.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hensher, D.A. (1989). An Assessment of Attrition in a Multi-Wave Panel of Households. In: Hauer, J., Timmermans, H., Wrigley, N. (eds) Urban Dynamics and Spatial Choice Behaviour. Theory and Decision Library, vol 49. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1009-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1009-6_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6944-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1009-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive