Skip to main content

Everyday Morality. Questions with and for Alfred Schutz

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Schutzian Phenomenology and Hermeneutic Traditions

Part of the book series: Contributions to Phenomenology ((CTPH,volume 68))

  • 1046 Accesses

Abstract

Alfred Schutz’s successful restitution of the social everyday world suffers from a certain moral abstinence which tends to leave the everyday to mere pragmatics. Our paper aims to overcome this shortcoming already noticed by Aron Gurwitsch. The everyday morality we are looking for is highly ambiguous. On the one hand, there is a mere common-sense morality absorbed by what everybody says and does. On the other hand, there is a morality which is incorporated in our everyday world and distributed among various vocational fields like medicine, law, technique or politics, but which exceeds what is common. Our everyday is not simply normal, but results from a process of normalisation. As Max Weber stresses, our everyday world contrasts with what is beyond the everyday. In order to discover this excess we need what Husserl calls an ethical epoché. This break has to be completed by a responsive epoché turning back to the demands to which our common speaking and doing responds. Such a responsive kind of ethics is largely inconspicuous, functioning as a sort of tacit morals. Robert Musil warns us against the over-consumption of morals which would extinguish the sparks of an intensified morality which keep us alive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I refer to my discussion of this debate in the essay “Die verachtete Doxa” (Waldenfels 1986).

  2. 2.

    For a distinction and evaluation of the different ordering factors that determine the field of action, I refer to Order in the Twilight (1996: Chapter B).

  3. 3.

    On the contrary, Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann, in their work Die gesellschaftliche Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit, by no means evade conflicts, but appealing to the power of the legitimators (1969: 117), they provide a solution from which Schutz obviously shies away. Nothing would be easier than appealing to the “normative force of the factual” in a legal-positivistic way. Cf. my article “Im Labyrinth des Alltags” (Waldenfels 1985: 161).

  4. 4.

    Concerning the dubious conditions of a phenomenological philosophy of values, I refer to my critical study “Wertqualitäten oder Erfahrungsansprüche?” (Waldenfels 1995).

  5. 5.

    The exemplary rank that music occupies in social theory is demonstrated by numerous single studies the publication of which is currently being prepared by Andreas Stascheit.

  6. 6.

    In these words, Schutz refers to Wilhelm Meister’s Apprenticeship, cf. Barber (2004: 145). Concerning the important role of vocational attitude, cf. not only the two grand speeches on vocation by Max Weber, but also Husserl’s Crisis, § 35, where the vocational worlds are analyzed as particular worlds of the life-world.

  7. 7.

    Mentioned in Erste Philosophie (Husserl 1959: 319); cf. Waldenfels, Schattenrisse der Moral (Waldenfels 2006: 48).

  8. 8.

    The distinction between direct and indirect forms of communication goes back to Kierkegaard’s Concluding Unscientific Postscript; Schutz refers to it in his essay “Über die mannigfachen Wirklichkeiten” (Schutz 1962: 243–4, 254–98) Cf. moreover the author’s Vielstimmigkeit der Rede (Waldenfels 1999: Preface: “Indirekte Rede”).

  9. 9.

    On the problem of representation, cf. the author’s Vielstimmigkeit der Rede (Waldenfels 1999: Chap. 6).

  10. 10.

    Cf. Waldenfels (2002: 156–164); in reference to authors such as Levinas and Ricœur: Liebsch (1999: Chap. VI).

  11. 11.

    With the high degree of specialization of research, reliability and concomitantly ethics, also gain in importance in science.

  12. 12.

    The essay that Peter Berger has dedicated to Schutz and Musil (Berger 1983) touches upon our topic in the form of Musil’s opposition between everyday and “the other state,” yet it does not contribute much to the question about an everyday morality in Schutz.

References

  • Barber, M.D. 2004. The participating citizen. New York: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. 1983. Das Problem der mannigfaltigen Wirklichkeiten: Alfred Schutz und Robert Musil. In Sozialität und Intersubjektivität. Phänomenologische Perspektiven der Sozialwissenschaften im Umkreis von Aron Gurwitsch und Alfred Schutz, ed. R. Grathoff and B. Waldenfels. Munich: Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P., and T. Luckmann. 1969. Die gesellschaftliche Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit. Frankfurt: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, H. 1961. Les deux sources de la morale et de la religion. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 1981. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, 2 vols. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. 1959. Erste Philosophie (1923/24). Zweiter Teil: Theorie der phänomenologischen Reduktion, Husserliana, vol. VIII. The Hague: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. 1974. Autrement qu’être ou au-delà de l’essence. The Hague. English edition: Levinas, E. 1981. Otherwise than being or beyond essence. (trans: A. Lingis). The Hague: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebsch, B. 1999. Geschichte als Antwort und Versprechen. Freiburg/Munich: Alber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckmann, T. 1973. Philosophie, Sozialwissenschaft und Alltagsleben. Soziale Welt 24(2/3): 137–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musil, R. 1978. Der Mann ohne Eigenschaften. Hamburg: Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. 1962. Collected papers. Vol. I: The problem of social reality, ed. M. Natanson. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. 1964. Collected papers. Vol. II: Studies in social theory, ed. A. Brodersen. The Hague: Martinus Nihhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A., and A. Gurwitsch. 1988. Briefwechsel 1939–1959, ed. R. Grathoff. Munich: Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srubar, I. 1988. Kosmion. Die Genese der pragmatischen Lebenswelttheorie von Alfred Schütz und ihr anthropologischer Hintergrund. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldenfels, B. 1985. In den Netzen der Lebenswelt. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldenfels, B. 1990. Der Stachel des Fremden. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldenfels, B. 1994. Antwortregister. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldenfels, B. 1995. Wertqualitäten oder Erfahrungsansprüche? In Intentionalität – Werte – Kunst (Husserl • Ingarden • Patočka), ed. J. Bloss, W. Stróžewski, and J. Zumr, 97–106. Prague: Oikumene.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldenfels, B. 1996. Order in the twilight. (trans: Parent, D.J.). Athens: Ohio University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldenfels, B. 1999. Vielstimmigkeit der Rede. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldenfels, B. 2002. Bruchlinien der Erfahrung. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldenfels, B. 2003. Der Fremde und der Heimkehrer. Fremdheitsfiguren bei Alfred Schutz. In Phänomenologie und soziale Wirklichkeit, ed. I. Srubar and S. Vaitkus, 175–188. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Waldenfels, B. 2006. Schattenrisse der Moral. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. 1926. Max Weber. Ein Lebensbild. Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. 1967. Wissenschaft als Beruf. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. 1968. Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. 1960. Philosophische Untersuchungen. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernhard Waldenfels .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Waldenfels, B. (2014). Everyday Morality. Questions with and for Alfred Schutz. In: Staudigl, M., Berguno, G. (eds) Schutzian Phenomenology and Hermeneutic Traditions. Contributions to Phenomenology, vol 68. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6034-9_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics