Skip to main content

Anthropological Fieldwork in Afghanistan and Pakistan Compared

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Muslims in Global Societies Series ((MGSS,volume 6))

Abstract

Marsden’s chapter also explores the complexity of studying everyday Islam in the equally heterogeneous religious and political context of northern Pakistan and Afghanistan. He describes two modalities, however, of his attempts to deal with this heterogeneity during fieldwork. These modalities built upon him learning from his own informants’ attitudes. In Chitral, northern Pakistan, where he conducted work in a village and small town home to Sunni and Shi’a Ismai’li Muslims, his informants did not let him participate in many forms of religious life. During research in northern Afghanistan, however, Marsden describes the process of being taught by his informants the art of balancing competing dimensions of life and holding any display of complete loyalty or commitment in suspended tension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    On the complexity of such identity formations in the context of Vietnam see Kwon (2010: 93).

  2. 2.

    A Springer anonymous reviewer misunderstood this point. She/he suggested that I pretended to be a Muslim in the field, and failed to ask questions about how this might effect the safety of the people I was with. By contrast, my interlocutors, without informing me, tell others that I am a Muslim, in the interest of my own safety, and theirs. This raises ethical issues of a different order than those that simply relate to how far my actions have implications for the safety of my interlocutors. They bring to light, rather, the ways in which ethical responsibility for any particular act always need to be understood in terms of the social relationships in which it was embedded, rather than as the outcome of an act of autonomous, individual agency (see Laidlaw 2010).

  3. 3.

    A one-time supporter of the pro-Soviet 1980s government of Dr Najibullah, who was serving as the personal secretary of the former jihadi MP, appeared to be more worried about my visiting mosques than the Islamist politicians for whom he worked: he advised me to stay out of the mosques, the course of action that subsequently followed with some degree of relief.

  4. 4.

    Clothing, indeed, is widely recognised by many in the country as an important dimension of the political strategies of Afghan politicians. The MPs and his advisors often discussed where posters that pictured him in a suit and tie should be displayed, and where those of him dressed in Afghan clothes and mujahid cap be placed: the former being posted in villages with significant populations of both Ismai’li Muslims and past supporters of the People’s Democractic Party of Afghanistan, and the latter sent to valleys whose inhabitants had largely supported the mujahidin.

  5. 5.

    On the concept of the ‘unthought’ in the Islamic tradition, see Arkoun (2002).

References

  • Ahmad, I. 2011. Immanent critique and Islam: Anthropological Reflections. Anthropological Theory 11(1): 107–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argenti-Pillen, A. 2007. Obvious presence: For fun or real? Cross cousin and international relationships in Sri Lanka. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 13(20): 313–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arkoun, M. 2002. The unthought in contemporary Islamic thought. London: Saqi Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asad, T. 1986. The Idea of an Anthropology of Islam, Occasional papers. Washington D.C.: Ctr. for Contemporary Arab Studies, Georgetown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, F.G. 1983. The tactical uses of passion: An essay on power, reason and reality. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, F.G. 1991. The prevalence of deceit. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, F. 1983. Sohar: Culture and identity in an Omani town. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, M.C. 1979. ‘This figure of tinsel’: A study of themes of hypocrisy and pessimism in Iranian culture. Daedalus 108(3): 125–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borneman, John, and Abdellah Hammoudi. 2009. Introduction. In Being there: The fieldwork encounter and the making of truth, ed. John Borneman and Abdellah Hammoudi, 1–24. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, M. 2000. Commanding right and forbidding wrong in Islamic thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, V. 1997. Critical events: An anthropological perspective on contemporary India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans-Pritchard, E.E. 1937. ‘Sanza’, a characteristic feature of Zande language and thought. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 18(1): 161–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabian, J. 2008. Ethnography as commentary: Writing from the virtual archive. Duke: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, H. 2005. On bullshit. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilsenan, M. 1976. Lying, honour and contradiction. In Transaction and meaning: Directions in the anthropology of exchange and symbolic behaviour, ed. B. Kapferer, 191–219. Philadelphia: Institute for the study of human issues.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilsenan, M. 1996. Lords of the Lebanese marches. London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • González, R. 2010. Militarizing culture: Essays on the warfare state. Walnut Creek: Left Coast press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, S. 2009. The soul freed of cares: Islamic prayer, subjectivity and the contradictions of moral selfhood in Minangkabau, Indonesia. American Ethnologist 36(2): 258–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammoudi, A. 2005. A season in Mecca: Narrative of a pilgrimage. London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschkind, C. 2006. The ethical soundscape. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamous, R. 1993. Messonge, violence et silence dans le monde méditerranéen. Last accessed on 7 Jan 2011 at http://terrain.revues.org/3075.

  • Kwon, H. 2010. The other cold war. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laidlaw, J. 2010. Agency and Responsibility: Perhaps You Can Have Too Much of a Good Thing. In Ordinary Ethics: Anthropology, Language, and Action, ed. M. Lambek, 143–64. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambek, M. 1997. Pinching the Crocodile’s tongue: Affinities and the anxieties of influence in fieldwork. Anthropology and Humanism 22(1): 31–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, M. 2005. Living Islam: Muslim religious experience in Pakistan’s North-West Frontier. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, S. 2005. The politics of piety: The Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, B. 1992. The calligraphic state. Berkeley: California University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohnuki Tierney, J. 1995. Wrapping culture: Politeness, presentation and power in Japan and other societies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ossella, F., and B. Soares. 2009. Islam, politics, anthropology. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 15: S1–S23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ossman, S. 2007. Places we share: Migration, subjectivity, and global mobility. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runciman, D. 2008. Political hypocrisy: The mask of power, from Hobbes to Orwell and beyond. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schielke, S. 2009. Ambivalent commitments: Troubles of morality, religiosity and aspiration among young Egyptians. Journal of Religion in Africa 39: 158–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schielke, S. 2010. Second thoughts about the anthropology of Islam, or how to make sense of grand schemes in everyday life. Zentrum Moderner Orient Working Papers. Berlin: ZMO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shklar, J. 1984. Ordinary vices. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starrett, G. 1995. Putting Islam to work. Berkeley: California University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werbner, Pnina. 2010. Notes from a small place: Anthropological blues in the face of global terror. Current Anthropology 51(2): 193–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikan, U. 1990. Managing turbulent hearts: A Balinese formula for living. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaloom, C. 2006. Out of the pits: Traders and technology from Chicago to London. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Magnus Marsden .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marsden, M. (2012). Anthropological Fieldwork in Afghanistan and Pakistan Compared. In: Marsden, M., Retsikas, K. (eds) Articulating Islam: Anthropological Approaches to Muslim Worlds. Muslims in Global Societies Series, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4267-3_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics