Abstract
Interception is an important process of the hydrological cycle, although it has been often neglected in hydrological considerations (Gerrits et al., 2010). Generally, interception loss is understood as a part of precipitation detained on vegetation canopy or leaf litter. Where vegetation is present, precipitation consists of gross rainfall (observed above the canopy or in a nearby open field), canopy through-fall and stem-flow. In stratified forest communities, where water drips from the canopy and is still intercepted by lower plants, secondary interception occurs. David and Gash (1989) reports the interception loss from forests in the range from 8 to 60% of the gross rainfall (from 25 to 75% of the overall evapotranspiration).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Balek, J. and Krecek, J. (1986). Regional differences in the water budget of spruce plantations (In Czech). In: Optimization of ecosystems in watersheds (In Czech), Czechoslovak Scientific and Technical Society, Prague, 82-89.
David, J. and Gash, J. (2009). Rainfall interception. SciTopics, http://www.scitopics.com/rainfallinterception.html
Gash, J.H.C., Wright, I.R. and Loyd, C.R. (1980). Comparative Estimates of Interception Loss from Three Coniferous Forest in Great Britain. Journal of Hydrology, 48: 89-105.
Gerrits, A.M.J., Pfister, L. and Savenije, H.H.G. (2010). Spatial and temporal variability of canopy and forest floor interception in a beech forest. Hydrological Processes, 24: 3011-3025.
Helvey, J.D. (1971). A summary of rainfall interception by certain conifers of North America. In: Biological effects in hydrological cycle. Proceedings of the 3rd International Seminar for Hydrology Professors, Pardue University, July 18-30, 1971, West Lafayette (Indiana), 103-113.
Lenzi, M. and Marchi, L. (2000). Suspended sediment load during floods in a small stream of the Dolomites (northeastern Italy). Catena, 39: 267-282.
Rutter, A.J., Kershaw, K.A., Robins, P.C. and Morton, A.J. (1971). A predictive model of rainfall interception in forests. Journal of Applied Ecology, 12: 367-381.
Zeng, N., Shuttleworth, J.W. and Gash, J.H.C. (2000). Influence of temporal variability of rainfall on interception loss. Journal of Hydrology, 228: 228-241.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Capital Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Puncochar, P., Krecek, J., van de Griend, A. (2012). Interception Storage in a Small Alpine Catchment. In: Krecek, J., Haigh, M.J., Hofer, T., Kubin, E. (eds) Management of Mountain Watersheds. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2476-1_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2476-1_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2475-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2476-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)