Abstract
This chapter presents a cyclic model of interprofessional collaboration to support children in their transition from preschool to school. The conceptual model is based on activity theory and the concepts of expansive learning and boundary crossing. The expansive cycles of interprofessional teamwork are described as the connections between the team versus the collective and also as internalization versus externalization levels of activities. The process involves the following four expansive phases:
-
1.
Selecting a problem of boundary work (the team, internalization)
-
2.
The analysis of systemic level contradictions (the collective, internalization)
-
3.
The development of new boundary-crossing forms of joint activities (the collective, externalization)
-
4.
Adapting these new actions to practice (the team, externalization)
In this chapter, these phases of boundary work are outlined in a review of theory, earlier research findings and empirical data. Developmental intervention is the method through which expansive learning cycles are facilitated.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahtola, A., Silinskas, G., Poikonen, P., Kontoniemi, M., Niemi, P., & Nurmi, J. -E. (2011). Transition to formal schooling: Do transition practices matter for academic achievement? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26(3), 295–302.
Anning, A., Cottrell, D., Frost, N., Green, J., & Robinson, M. (2008). Developing multiprofessional teamwork for integrated children’s services: Research, policy and practice. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist, Ed., C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Blackler, F., & McDonald, S. (2000). Power, mastery and organizational learning. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 833–851.
Bokeno, M. R., & Gantt, V. W. (2000). Dialogic mentoring. Management Communication Quarterly, 14(2), 237–270.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brooker, L. (2002). Starting school: Young children learning cultures. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Burbules, N. C. (2006). Rethinking dialogue in networked spaces. Cultural Studies, Critical Methodologies, 6(1), 107–122.
Cunliffe, A. L. (2002). Reflexive dialogical practice in management learning. Management Learning, 33(1), 35–61.
D’Amour, D., Ferrada-Videla, M., San Martin Rodriguez, L., & Beaulieu, M.-D. (2005). The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: Core concepts and theoretical frameworks. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19(Suppl. 1), 116–131.
Decuyper, S., Dochy, F., & van den Bossche, P. (2010). Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: An integrative model for effective team learning in organizations. Educational Research Review, 5(2), 111–133.
Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2004). Starting school: Perspectives of Australian children, parents and education. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 2(2), 171–189.
Dunlop, A.-W. (2007). Bridging research, policy and practice. In A.-W. Dunlop & H. Fabian (Eds.), Informing transitions in the early years (pp. 151–168). London: Open University Press.
Edwards, A. (2010). Inter-professional work and expertise: New roles at the boundaries of schools. British Educational Research Journal, 36(1), 27–45.
Edwards, A., Daniels, H., Gallagher, T., Leadbetter, J., & Warmington, P. (2009). Improving inter-professional collaborations. Multi-agency working for children’s wellbeing. London: Routledge.
Einarsdottir, J. (2006). From pre-school to primary school: When different contexts meet. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(2), 165–184.
Engeström, Y. (1990). When is a tool? Multiple meanings of artifacts in human activity. In Y. Engeström (Ed.), Learning, working and imagining. Twelve studies in activity theory (pp. 171–195). Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
Engeström, Y. (1999a). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (1999b). Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 377–404). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.
Engeström, Y. (2004). New forms of learning in co-configuration work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(1), 11–21.
Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Kärkkäinen, M. (1995). Polycontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition: Learning and problem solving in complex work activities. Learning and Instruction, 5(4), 319–336.
Fabian, H., & Dunlop, A.-W. (2002). Introduction. In H. Fabian & A.-W. Dunlop (Eds.), Transitions in the early years: Debating continuity and progression for young children in early education (pp. 1–7). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Fredriksson, G. (1993). Integration förskola, skola, fritidshem – utopi och verglighet [The integration of preschool, school, afternoon care of school aged children – utopia or reality; in Swedish]. Stockholm: HLS Förlag.
Griebel, W., & Niesel, R. (2002). Co-constructing transition into kindergarten and school by children, parents and teachers. In H. Fabian & A.-W. Dunlop (Eds.), Transitions in the early years: Debating continuity and progression for young children in early education (pp. 64–75). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Housley, W. (2003). Interaction in multidisciplinary teams. Chippenham, Wiltshire: Ashgate. Cardiff Papers in Qualitative Research.
Huotari, R. (2008). Development of collaboration in multiproblem cases: Some possibilities and challenges. Journal of Social Work, 8(1), 83–98.
Huzzard, T., Ahlberg, B. M., & Ekman, M. (2010). Constructing interorganizational collaboration: The action researcher as boundary subject. Action Research, 8(3), 293–314.
Kerosuo, H. (2003). Boundaries in health care discussions: An activity theoretical approach to the analysis of boundaries. In N. Paulsen & T. Hermes (Eds.), Managing boundaries in organizations: Multiple perspectives (pp. 169–187). Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Konkola, R., Tuomi-Gröhn, T., Lambert, P., & Ludvigsen, S. (2007). Promoting learning and transfer between school and workplace. Journal of Education and Work, 20(3), 211–228.
Leathard, A. (2003). Introduction. In A. Leathard (Ed.), Interprofessional collaboration: From policy to practice in health and social care (pp. 3–11). Hove, UK: Brunner-Routledge.
Leontjev, A. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
LoCasale-Crouch, J., Mashburn, A. J., Downer, J. T., & Pianta, R. C. (2008). Pre-kindergarten teachers’ use of transition practices and children’s adjustment to kindergarten. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23(1), 124–139.
Margetts, K. (2002). Planning transition programmes. In H. Fabian & A.-W. Dunlop (Eds.), Transitions in the early years: Debating continuity and progression for young children in early education (pp. 111–122). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Niesel, R., & Griebel, W. (2007). Enhancing the competence of transition systems through co-construction. In A.-W. Dunlop & H. Fabian (Eds.), Informing transitions in the early years (pp. 21–32). London: Open University Press.
Nilsson, M. (2003). Transformation through integration. An activity theoretical analysis of school development as integration of child care institutions and the elementary school (Dissertation Series No. 2). Karlskrona: Blekinge Institute of Technology.
Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, ba and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 33(1), 5–34.
Pianta, R. C., & Walsh, D. J. (1996). High-risk children in schools: Constructing, sustaining relationships. New York: Routledge.
Poikonen, P. -L. (2003). “Opetussuunnitelma on sitä elämää”. Päiväkoti – kouluyhteisö opetus-suunnitelman kehittäjänä [“The curriculum is part of our life” The day-care – cum – primary school community as a curriculum developer; in Finnish] (Psychology and Social Research No. 230). Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä. Jyväskylä Studies in Education [English abstract and summary].
Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Pianta, R. C. (2000). Teachers’ judgments of problems in the transition to kindergarten. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15(2), 147–168.
Sarja, A., & Janhonen, S. (2009). Methodological reflections: Supervisory discourses and practice-based learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(6), 621–632.
Schulting, A. B., Malone, P. S., & Dodge, K. A. (2005). The effect of school-based kindergarten transition policies and practices on child academic outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 41(6), 860–871.
Tuomi-Gröhn, T., Engeström, Y., & Young, M. (2003). From transfer to boundary crossing between school and work as a tool for developing vocational education: An introduction. In T. Tuomi-Gröhn & Y. Engeström (Eds.), Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing (Advances in learning and instruction series, pp. 1–15). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wartofsky, M. W. (1979). Perception, representation, and the forms of action: Towards a historical epistemology. In M. W. Wartofsky (Ed.), Models: Representation and the scientific understanding (pp. 188–210). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Reidel.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sarja, A., Poikonen, PL., Nilsson, M. (2012). Interprofessional Collaboration in Supporting Transition to School. In: Tynjälä, P., Stenström, ML., Saarnivaara, M. (eds) Transitions and Transformations in Learning and Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2312-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2312-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2311-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2312-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)