Skip to main content

Teachers’ Professional Learning: Modelling at the Boundaries

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Trends in Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling

Abstract

This paper explores teachers’ professional learning in mathematical modelling using a range of theoretical tools. The study on which it is based gives a snapshot of the work of a development group of teachers near the outset of their journey into modelling. Narrative accounts of their development in terms of both their teaching and students’ learning are analysed using an instrument developed for this purpose. The results provide insight into important issues to consider when supporting professional learning in general and modelling in particular. This small scale study points to the importance for teachers of renegotiating the didactical contract of their classrooms when introducing modelling and consequently the need for professional learning that expands their repertoires in relation to both subject knowledge and particularly pedagogy more generally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.lema-project.org/web.lemaproject/web/eu/tout.php

  2. 2.

    http://www.education.manchester.ac.uk/research/centres/lta/LTAResearch/lema/

References

  • Askew, M., Brown, M., Rhodes, V., Johnson, D., & William, D. (1997). Effective teachers of numeracy – Final report. London: King’s College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., Hoover Thames, M., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beach, K. D. (1999). Consequential transitions: A sociocultural expedition beyond transfer in education. Review of Research in Education, 24, 124–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardella, M. E. (2008). Which mathematics should we teach engineering students? An empirically grounded case for a broad notion of mathematical thinking. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 27(3), 150–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engestrom, Y., & Cole, M. (1997). Situated cognition in search of an agenda. In J. A. Whitson & D. Kirshner (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 301–309). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engestrom, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualisation. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, G., & Maaß, K. (2006). Modelling in lower secondary mathematics classrooms – Problems and opportunities. In W. Blum, P. Galbraith, H.-W. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, G., Schwarz, B., & Tiedemann, S. (2010). Future teachers’ professional knowledge on modeling. In R. Lesh, P. Galbraith, C. Haines, & A. Hurford (Eds.), Modeling students mathematical competencies: ICTMA 13 (pp. 445–457). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofsted (2008). Mathematics: understanding the score. London: Office for Standards in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pehkonen, E., & Torner, G. (1996). Mathematical beliefs and different aspects of their meaning. Zentralblatt fur Didaktikder der Mathematik, 28, 101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition and sense – Making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wake, G. (2009a). Learning through mathematical modelling. Report to NCETM. May be downloaded at http://www.ncetm.org.uk/files/504526/. Final_Report_G080713_University_Manchester.pdf.

  • Wake, G. (2009). Conceptualising and implementing teacher professional development in mathematics in England. Paper presented at European conference on educational research, Vienna, Sep 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicka, A. (1999). German “cultural scripts”: Public signs as a key to social attitudes and cultural values. Discourse and Society, 9(2), 241–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoff D. Wake .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wake, G.D. (2011). Teachers’ Professional Learning: Modelling at the Boundaries. In: Kaiser, G., Blum, W., Borromeo Ferri, R., Stillman, G. (eds) Trends in Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling. International Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0910-2_62

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics