Skip to main content

Travel

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Images of the Future City

Abstract

Traveling or mobility helps people satisfy a number of needs and creates conditions for the households to shape their own activity patterns. Traveling can also serve other functions than the purely logical ones. Travel targets and means both function as social markers and the traveling can also own a value in itself, in that it can offer the concrete possibility of escaping from something or creating an opportunity for recovery and adaptation between different settings.

Chapter written by Mattias Höjer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Berge, G. et al. “Velferdsvirkninger af redusert mobilitet” (Welfare effects of reduced mobility), 1992.

  2. 2.

    Steen, P. et al. Färder i framtiden, 1997.

  3. 3.

    Frändberg, L. Fritidens globalisering ur ett rörlighetsperspektiv (Globalization of leisure travel from a mobility perspective), 2000, p. 7.

  4. 4.

    Höjer, M. and Mattsson, L.-G. Determinism and backcasting in future studies, 2000.

  5. 5.

     Bergman, B. et al. Hot eller bot? (Threat or cure?), 2002, pp. 86ff.

  6. 6.

    Forty-six percent said the car was the usual travel means, followed by 37% indicating public transport, 8% bicycles, 8% walking, 1% carpooling and 0.2% indicated other means. A number of pros and cons could be listed.

  7. 7.

     Fifty-eight percent of public transport users aver that it is an inexpensive transport means. Nearly as many or 55% think that it is comfortable to travel on public transport. However, the advantage most often brought forth by the respondents is that public transport is good for the environment – 63% say so while less than 1% think cars are good for the environment.

  8. 8.

    Sixty-four percent of the bicycle users see it as good for health, 43% that it is inexpensive and 38% that it is comfortable. The environmental gain is stated as an advantage by 49%.

  9. 9.

     Steen et al. 1997.

  10. 10.

    Gullberg et al. Bilder av framtidsstaden, 2007, Chap. 28.

  11. 11.

    Ellegård, K. “Vardagslivets valfrihet – om energianvändning, vardagsliv och bebyggelsemönster” (Freedom of choice in everyday life – …), 2004.

  12. 12.

    For sources, see Table 13.1.

  13. 13.

    According to Chap. 27 the total energy by Swedish residents is app. 350 TWh.

  14. 14.

    Newman, P and Kenworthy, J. Sustainability and Cities, 1999.

  15. 15.

    Data taken from the National Travel Survey, RES, annual average 1999–2001, travel means from the measurement day.

  16. 16.

    The number of private cars in Stockholm City was 363 per 1,000 residents at the end of the year 2009. The comparable figure for the county was 393 and for the country 461. Source: Statistics Sweden 2010.

  17. 17.

    SIKA, Luftfart 2004 (Aviation), 2005.

  18. 18.

    IPCC, Aviation and the global atmosphere, 1999.

  19. 19.

    In a number of studies of future transport done at the Environmental strategies research group, (later the Division of Environmental Strategic Analysis, Royal Institute of Technology), images of a sustainable transport system in Sweden have been prepared. Examples include Steen et al. 1997, Åkerman, J. et al. Destination framtiden (Destination future), 2000; Höjer, M. What is the point of IT? 2000; Höjer, M. “Telecommunicators in the multinuclear city”, 2001, Åkerman, J. and Höjer, M. How much transport can the climate stand? Sweden on a sustainable path in 2050, 2006 and Åkerman J. Transport systmes meeting long-term climate targets, 2011.

  20. 20.

    Höjer, M. A hundred nodes in the Stockholm region, 2002.

  21. 21.

    Höjer 2001.

  22. 22.

    Steen et al. 1997.

  23. 23.

    Ibid.

Bibliography

  • Åkerman J, Höjer M (2006) How much transport can the climate stand? Sweden on a sustainable path in 2050. Energ Policy 34(14):1944–1957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Åkerman J et al (2000) Destination framtiden: vägar mot ett bärkraftigt transportsystem. KFB-Report 2000:66, Swedish Transport and Communication Research Board, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Berge G, Rundmo T, Stenstadvold M (1992) Velferdsvirkninger af redusert mobilitet. Report 128/1992, The Institute of Transport Economics, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman B et al (2002) Hot eller bot? Stadens roll i en hållbar utveckling. FMS report 174, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellegård K (2004) Vardagslivets valfrihet: om energianvändning, vardagsliv och bebyggelsemönster. In: Blücher G, Graninger G (eds) Krävs energi i samhällsplaneringen? Stiftelsen Vadstena forum för samhällsbyggande, Linköping

    Google Scholar 

  • Frändberg L (2000) Fritidens globalisering ur ett rörlighetsperspektiv: en kunskapsöversikt. KFB-VINNOVA Report 2000:31, Swedish Transport and Communication Research Board, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Gullberg A, Höjer M, Pettersson R (2007) Bilder av framtidsstaden – tid och rum för hållbar utveckling. Brutus Östlings bokförlag Symposion, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Höjer M (2000) What is the point of IT?: backcasting urban transport and land-use futures. Institutionen för infrastruktur och samhällsplanering, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Höjer M (2001) Telecommunicators in the multinuclear city. In: Snickars F, Olerup B, Persson L-O (eds) Reshaping regional planning: a northern perspective. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Höjer M (2002) A hundred nodes in the Stockholm region: a simple calculation of the effects on commuting. Environ Plann B 29(2):197–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höjer M, Mattsson LG (2000) Determinism and backcasting in future studies. Futures 32(7):613–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (1999) Aviation and the global atmosphere. Intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman P, Kenworthy J (1999) Sustainability and cities: overcoming automobile dependence. Island, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • I SIKA (2005) Luftfart 2004. SIKA statistics 2005:1, Swedish Institute for Transport and Communications Analysis, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Sweden (2010) Passenger cars in use in counties and by ownership etc at the end of year 2009, Table RSK2, http://www.scb.se/Pages/ProductTables____10516.aspx

  • Steen P et al (1997) Färder i framtiden: transporter i ett bärkraftigt samhälle, KFB-Report 1997:7, Swedish Transport and Communication Research Board, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mattias Höjer .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Höjer, M., Gullberg, A., Pettersson, R. (2011). Travel. In: Images of the Future City. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0653-8_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics