Skip to main content

Part of the book series: CRM Series ((CRMSNS,volume 16))

  • 880 Accesses

Abstract

An ultrahomogeneous structure is a (finite or countable) relational structure for which every partial isomorphism between finite substructures can be extended to a global isomorphism. This very strong symmetry condition implies that there are just a few ultrahomogeneous structures. For example, by [14], there are just countably many ultrahomogeneous undirected graphs. The classification program is one of the celebrated lines of research in the model theory, see [4, 15]. Various measures were introduced in order to modify a structure to an ultrahomogeneous one. A particularly interesting measure is the minimal arity of added relations (i.e. the minimal arity of an extension or lift) which suffice to produce an ultrahomogeneous structure. If these added relations are not changing the automorphism group then the problem is called the relational complexity and this is the subject of this paper. In the context of permutation groups, the relational complexity was defined in [5] and was recently popularized by Cherlin [2,3]. We determine the relational complexity of one of the most natural class of structures (the class of structures defined by forbidden homomorphisms). This class has a (countably) universal structure [6]. As a consequence of our main result (Theorem 3.1) we strengthen this by determining its relational complexity. Although formulated in the context of model theory this result has a combinatorial character. Full details will appear in [9].

The Computer Science Institute of Charles University (IUUK) is supported by grant ERC-CZ LL- 1201 of the Czech Ministry of Education and CE-ITI P202/16/6061 of GAČR

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. P. J. Cameron, The age of a relational structure, In: “Directions in Infinite Graph Theory and Combatorics”, R. Diestel (ed.), Topic in Discrete Math. 3, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1992), 49–67.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. L. Cherlin, Finite Groups and Model Theory, In: “Proceedings of 2nd workshop on homogeneous structures”, D. Hartman (ed.), Matfyz press (2012), 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. L. Cherlin, On the relational complexity of a finite permutation group, in preparation, available at http://www.math.rutgers.edu/∼cherlin/Paper/inprep.html/∼cherlin/Paper/inprep.html.

  4. G. L. Cherlin, “The classification of countable homogeneous directed graphs and countable homogeneous n-tournaments”, Memoirs Amer. Math. Soc. 621, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. L. Cherlin, G. Martin and D. Saracino, Arities of permutation groups: Wreath products and k-sets, J. Combinatorial Theory, Ser. A 74 (1996), 249–286.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. G. L. Cherlin, S. Shelah and N. Shi, Universal Graphs with Forbidden Subgraphs and Algebraic Closure, Advances in Applied Mathematics 22 (1999), 454–491.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Covington, Homogenizable Relational Structures, Illinois J. Mathematics 34(4) (1990), 731–743.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. P. L. Erdős, D. Pálvölgyi, C. Tardif and G. Tardos, On infinite-finite tree-duality pairs of relational structures, arXiv:1207.4402v1 (submitted) (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Hartman, J. Hubička, J. Nešetřil, Complexities of relational structures, Math. Slovaca, accepted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. Hodges, “Model Theory”, Cambridge University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Hubička and J. Nešetřil, Homomorphism and embedding universal structures for restricted classes, arXiv:0909.4939.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Hubička and J. Nešetřil, Universal structures with forbidden homomorphisms, arXiv:0907.4079, to appear in J. Väänänen Festschrift, Ontos.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. S. Kechris, V. G. Pestov and S. Todorčevič, Fraïssé Limits, Ramsey Theory, and Topological Dynamics of Automorphism Groups, Geom. Funct. Anal. 15 (2005), 106–189.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. A. H. Lachlan and R. E. Woodroow, Countable ultrahomogeneous graphs, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 284(2) (1984), 431–461.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. A. H. Lachlan, Homogeneous Structures, In: “Proc. of the ICM 1986”, AMS, Providence, 1987, 314–321.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Nešetřil, For graphs there are only four types of hereditary Ramsey Classes, J. Combin. Theory B 46(2) (1989), 127–132.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Nešetřil, Ramsey Classes and Homogeneous Structures, Combinatorics, Probablity and Computing (2005) 14, 171–189.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Jaroslav Nešetřil Marco Pellegrini

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Scuola Normale Superiore Pisa

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hartman, D., Hubička, J., Nešetřil, J. (2013). Combinatorial bounds on relational complexity. In: Nešetřil, J., Pellegrini, M. (eds) The Seventh European Conference on Combinatorics, Graph Theory and Applications. CRM Series, vol 16. Edizioni della Normale, Pisa. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-7642-475-5_90

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics