Abstract
Westerners might wonder why people in India are starving when there are cows lined up at the roadsides. At first sight it looks as if values, or moral rules vary considerably. Often, however, such variation is not due to a difference in moral maxims but rather to a difference in beliefs (Rachels 1993), or moral focusing i.e., the implementation of a general rule in a concrete cultural context. Both people from India and the West agree that we should not remain hungry, suffer from malnutrition or starve to death; they may differ, however, in their assessment of whether the outdoor cow is potential food or a sacred symbol, a “holy cow”.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Axelrod LJ, McDaniels T, Slovic P (1999) Perceptions of ecological risk from natural hazards. J Risk Res 2:31–53
Berger P (1973) On the obsolescence of the concept of honour. In: Berger P, Merger B, Kellner H (Eds) The homeless mind. Penguin, Harmondsworth, pp 78–89
Bergmann J, Luckmann T (1999) Morals and communication (Moral und Kommunikation). In: Bergmann J, Luckmann T (Eds) Kommunikative Konstruktion von Moral. Band 1: Struktur und Dynamik der Formen moralischer Kommunikation. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, pp 13–36
Bohnsack R (2000) Reconstructive social research. Introduction to methodology and practice of qualitative research (Rekonstruktive Sozialforschung. Einführung in Methodologie und Praxis qualitativer Forschung), 4th Edn. Leske + Budrich, Opladen
D’Andrade RG (1990) Culture and personality: a false dichotomy. In: Jordon DK, Swartz MJ (Eds) Personality and the cultural construction of society. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, pp 145–160
Durkheim E (1955) The elementary forms of the religious life. Free Press, New York (Original: 1912)
Fiske AP (1991) Structures of social life. The four elementary forms of human relations. Free Press, New York
Fiske AP, Tetlock PE (1997) Taboo trade-offs: reactions to transactions that transgress the spheres of justice. Polit Psychol 18:255–297
Gaskell G, Bauer MW (Eds) (2001) Biotechnology 1996–2000. The years of controversy. Science Museum, London
Habermas J (2001) The future of human nature. On the way to liberal eugenics? (Die Zukunft der menschlichen Natur. Auf dem Weg zu einer liberalen Eugenik?) Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main
Haidt J (2001) The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol Rev 108:814–834
Haslam N (Ed) (2004) Relational models theory: a contemporary overview. Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates, Mahwah NJ
Haslam N, Rothschild L, Ernst D (2002) Are essentialist beliefs associated with prejudice? Br J Soc Psychol 41:87–100
Hutchby I, Wooffitt R (1998) Conversation analysis. Principles, practices and applications. Polity Press, Cambridge
Jonas H (1984) The imperative of responsibility: in search of an ethics for the technological age (Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation). Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main
Lakoff G (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL
Mangold W (1960) Subject and method of the group discussion procedure (Gegenstand und Methode des Gruppendiskussionsverfahrens). Europäische Verlagsanstalt, Frankfurt am Main
Marková I (2000) Amédée or how to get rid of it: social representations from a dialogical perspective. Cult Psychol 6:419–460
McGraw AP, Tetlock PE (2005) Taboo trade-offs, relational framing, and the acceptability of exchanges. J Consum Psychol 15:2–15
Moloney G, Walker I (2000) Messiahs, pariahs, and donors: the development of social representations of organ transplants. J Theory Soc Behav 30:203–227
Moscovici S (2001) Why a theory of social representations? In: Deaux K, Philogène G (Eds) Representations of the social. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 8–35
Nerlich B, Clarke DD, Dingwall R (2000) Clones and crops: the use of stock characters and word play in two debates about bioengineering. Metaph Symb 15:223–239
Potter J, Wetherell M (1987) Discourse and social psychology. Beyond attitudes and behaviour. Sage, London
Quine WV (1969) Ontological relativity and other essays. Columbia University Press, New York
Rachels J (1993) The elements of moral philosophy, 2nd Edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Rothbart M, Taylor M (1992) Category labels and social reality: do we view social categories as natural kinds? In: Semin GR, Fiedler K (Eds) Language, interaction and social cognition. Sage, London, pp 11–36
Royzman EB, Sabini J (2001) Something it takes to be an emotion: the interesting case of disgust. J Theory Soc Behav 31:29–59
Rozin P (1999) The process of moralization. Psychol Sci 10:218–221
Rozin P, Lowery L, Imada S, Haidt J (1999) The CAD triad hypothesis: a mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). J Pers Soc Psychol 76:574–586
Schütz H, Wiedemann PM, Gray PCR (1999) The intuitive evaluation of genetically modified products — cognitive and interactive aspects (Die intuitive Beurteilung gentechnischer Produkte — kognitive und interaktive Aspekte). In: Hampel J, Renn O (Eds) Gentechnik in der Öffentlichkeit: Wahrnehmung und Bewertung einer umstrittenen Technologie. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, pp 133–169
Smelser NJ (1998) The rational and the ambivalent in the social sciences. Am Sociol Rev 63:1–16
Tetlock PE, Kristel OV, Elson SB, Green MC, Lerner JS (2000) The psychology of the unthinkable: taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. J Pers Soc Psychol 78:853–870
Wagner W (1998) Social representations and beyond: brute facts, symbolic coping and domesticated worlds. Cult Psychol 4:297–329
Wagner W, Hayes N (2005) Everyday discourse and common sense. The theory of social representations. Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Wagner W, Duveen G, Farr R, Jovchelovitch S, Lorenzi-Cioldi F, Marková I, Rose D (1999) Theory and method of social representations. Asian J Soc Psychol 2:95–125
Wagner W, Kronberger N, Seifert F (2002) Collective symbolic coping with new technology: knowledge, images and public discourse. Br J Soc Psychol 41:323–343
Zelizer VA (1994) Pricing the priceless child. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ
Zerubavel E (1997) Social mindscapes. An invitation to cognitive sociology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kronberger, N. (2008). Moralities We Live by: Moral Focusing in the Context of Technological Change. In: Sugiman, T., Gergen, K.J., Wagner, W., Yamada, Y. (eds) Meaning in Action. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-74680-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-74680-5_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-74679-9
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-74680-5
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)